Kamei, Kenju
(2021):
*Transfer Paradox in a General Equilibrium Economy: An Experimental Investigation.*

Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_111307.pdf Download (4MB) | Preview |

## Abstract

The transfer paradox, whereby a transfer of resources that influences the equilibrium price benefits the donor while harming the recipient, is a classic paradox in general equilibrium theory. This paper pursues an experimental investigation of the transfer paradox using a three-agent pure exchange economy that is predicted to have such a paradox. The results indicate that an endowment adjustment among agents influences the market price, and consequently the donors benefit from the transfer, consistent with the competitive equilibrium theory. When given an option to make a transfer, half of donor agents voluntarily decide to adjust the endowment distribution.

Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|

Original Title: | Transfer Paradox in a General Equilibrium Economy: An Experimental Investigation |

English Title: | Transfer Paradox in a General Equilibrium Economy: An Experimental Investigation |

Language: | English |

Keywords: | experiments, transfer paradox, general equilibrium, equilibrium effects |

Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D51 - Exchange and Production Economies |

Item ID: | 111307 |

Depositing User: | Kenju Kamei |

Date Deposited: | 03 Jan 2022 05:00 |

Last Modified: | 03 Jan 2022 05:00 |

References: | Aumann, R., Pele, B., 1974. A note on Gale's example. J.Math.Econ. 1:209-211. Chichilnisky, G., 1980. Basic goods, the effects of commodity transfers and the international economic order. J.Dev.Econ. 7(4):505-519. Dubey, R., Kang, M., 2019. Transfer paradox in a stable equilibrium. Econ. Theory Bulletin. 7:259-269. Gale, D., 1974. Exchange Equilibrium and Coalitions: An Example. J.Math.Econ. 1:63-66. Gode, Dhananjay, Stephen Spear, and Shyam Sunder, 2004. Convergence of Double Auctions to Pareto Optimal Allocations in the Edgeworth Box. Yale ICF Working Paper 04-30. Kang, M., Rasmusen, E., 2016. The Transfer Paradox. Working paper. Kang, M., Ye, L., 2014. Coalition-enhancing fiscal policies in an open economy: A CES framework of Gale’s transfer paradox. J.Math.Econ. 50:141-147. Kang, M., Ye, L., 2014. Advantageous redistribution with three smooth CES utility functions. J.Math.Econ. 67:171-180. Leontief, W., 1936. Note on the pure theory of capital transfer. In Explorations in economics, Notes and Essays Contributed in Honor of F.W.Taussig. Polemarchakis, H., 1983. On the Transfer Paradox. Int. Econ. Rev. 24(3):749-760. Rao, M., 1992. On the transfer and advantageous. Soc. Choice Welf. 9(2):131-139. Samuelson, P. 1952. The Transfer Problem and Transport Costs: The Terms of Trade When Impediments Are Absent. Econ.J. 62(246):278-305. Turner, S., 2016. How much trade does the transfer paradox require? working paper. Yano, M., 1983. Welfare Aspects of the Transfer Problem. J. Int. Econ. 15:277-289. |

URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/111307 |