Krummel, Daniel and Siegfried, Patrick and Michel, Alex (2020): Millenials’ Employer Brand Perception in a German Retail Context. Published in: Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies No. 8 (22 December 2020): pp. 396-418.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_111580.pdf Download (774kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Since tangible assets of companies are becoming increasingly insignificant, emphasis should rather be placed on human capital as an essential source of competitive edge. This paper, accordingly, pursues the purpose to shed light on the major demands that the Millenials place on their prospective employers. In consequence, the work aims to identify attractiveness factors that German retailers should particularly promote in order to succeed in the war for talents and attract the most promising candidates among the German GenY. This work is based on a mixed-methods approach. First, interviews with German retail experts as well as generational keynote speakers were conducted in order to obtain a deep understanding and assessment of the German retail landscape from a professional perspective. The insights gained were subsequently used to design a questionnaire, which distribution led to a final sample of 216 useable responses by Millenials. Furthermore, the data obtained by interviewing experts and the survey was subsequently compared in order to evaluate to what extent the expectations of the Millenials correspond to the experts’ assessment. This study reveals Millenials to be driven by the need for growth, such as wide offers of development opportunities or scope for decision when choosing an employer. Among the relatedness needs, a harmonious working environment is particularly important, whereas a weekend off ranks first among the existential needs. Moreover, male Millenials consider Media Markt is the most popular employer in the German retail sector, while dm is preferred from a female perspective. Overall, employers of the German retail sector provide the majority of factors required by the Millenials, yet are only considered the 4th most popular industry behind the automotive, IT, art and entertainment industries. Our findings provide valuable practical implications as the research results might serve companies to build up a target group-specific employer brand. Marketing strategies can be aligned with the identified attractiveness factors to efficiently and cost-effectively attract and bind Millenials to the company. Customized recruiting campaigns enhance the appeal as well as the attractiveness of an employer driving the likelihood of obtaining the strived status: Employer of Choice. To the best of the author’s knowledge, no study has yet dealt specifically with the attractiveness factors demanded by the Millenials in the context of the German re- tail sector as well as their most aspired employers in this industry. Furthermore, the attractiveness factors identified in the literature were embedded in Aldefer’s ERG theory. This work also offers a bilateral perspective through the widely conducted survey carried out among Millenials, which was additionally expanded through the lens of experts.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Millenials’ Employer Brand Perception in a German Retail Context |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Employer Branding, Generation Y, Millenials, Employer Attractiveness Factors, Retailing |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L81 - Retail and Wholesale Trade ; e-Commerce M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics |
Item ID: | 111580 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Dr. Patrick Siegfried |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jan 2022 14:18 |
Last Modified: | 18 Jan 2022 14:18 |
References: | Alderfer, C. (1969). An Empirical Test of a New Theory of Human Needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 142-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90004-X Ambler, T., & Barrow, S. (1996). The Employer Brand. Journal of Brand Management, 4, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.1996.42 Andreassen, T. W., & Lanseng, E. J. (2010). Service Differentiation: A Self-Image Con- gruency Perspective on Brand Building in the Labor Market. Journal of Service Man- agement, 21, 212-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231011039295 Bahner, J., & Eisele, D. (2004). Das Arbeitgeberimage im Mittelpunkt—Campus Recruit- ing. In Universität Stuttgart (Ed.), Jahrbuch Wechselwirkungen (pp. 3-20). Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart. Bartosik-Purgat, M., & Jankowska, B. (2017). The Use of Social Networking Sites in Job Related Activities: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Entrepreneurial Business and Eco- nomics Review, 5, 177-193. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050210 Baum, M., & Kabst, R. (2013). How to Attract Applicants in the Atlantic versus the Asia-Pacific Region? A Cross-National Analysis on China, India, Germany, and Hun- gary. Journal of World Business, 48, 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.002 Berthon, P., Ewing, M., & Hah, L. L. (2005). Captivating Company: Dimensions of At- tractiveness in Employer Branding. International Journal of Advertising, 24, 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2005.11072912 Christiaans, L. (2013). International Employer Brand Management: A Multilevel Analysis and Segmentation of Students’ Preferences. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00456-9 Cisik, A. (2015). Arbeitgeberattraktivität zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Eine empirische Studie. Management Summary. http://www.cisikconsulting.de/wp-content/uloads/2015/10/Cisik_Arbeitgeberattraktivit %C3%A4t-zwischen-Anspruch-und-Wirklichkeit_Management-Summary_170915.pdf Destatis (2019). Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland—GENESIS-Online: Die Datenbank des Statistischen Bundesamtes. https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online Destatis (2020). Eckzahlen Zum Arbeitsmarkt, Deutschland. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Arbeit/Arbeitsmarkt/Erwerbstaetigkeit/Tabellen/ eckwerttabelle.html;jsessionid=18DB657C9F128E1F362DBB229B1939B2.internet8711 Eger, L., Mičík, M., Gangur, M., & Řehoř, P. (2019). Employer Branding: Exploring At- tractiveness Dimensions in a Multicultural Context. Technological and Economic De- velopment of Economy, 25, 519-541. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.9387 Embrace (2015). Embrace Studie—Karriere trifft Sinn. https://www.saatkorn.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/delightful-downloads/2015/ 12/Epaper_Karriere_trifft_Sinn.pdf?utm_source=wysija&utm_medium=email&utm_c ampaign=Download-Studie-KtS Flick, U. (2014). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publi- cations. Frank, F. D., Finnegan, R. P., & Taylor, C. R. (2004). The Race for Talent: Retaining and Engaging Workers in the 21st Century. Human Resource Planning, 27, 12-25. Franke, N. (2000). Personalmarketing zur Gewinnung von betriebswirtschaftlichem Führungsnachwuchs. Zur Positionierung von Unternehmen in studentischen Ziel- gruppen. Marketing ZFP Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, 22, 75-92. https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2000-1-75 Geighardt-Knollmann, C. (2011). DGFP Studie: Megatrends und HR Trends. https://www.dgfp.de/hr-wiki/Employer_Branding.pdf Graham, B. Z., & Cascio, W. F. (2018). The Employer-Branding Journey: Its Relationship with Crosscultural Branding, Brand Reputation, and Brand Repair. Management Re- search—The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 16, 363-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-09-2017-0779 Graue, C. (2015). Special Issue: Research Methodology—Qualitative Data Analysis. In- ternational Journal of Sales, Retailing and Marketing, 9, 5-14. Hackman, J., & Lawler, E. (1971). Employee Reactions to Job Characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 259-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031152 Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247757.001.0001 HDE (2019). Beschäftigungsstruktur im Einzelhandel. https://einzelhandel.de/beschaeftigungsstruktur Holste, J. H. (2012). Arbeitgeberattraktivität im demographischen Wandel: Eine multi- dimensionale Betrachtung. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4442-9 Holtbrügge, D., & Kreppel, H. (2015). Employer Attractiveness of Chinese, Indian and Russian Firms in Germany: Signaling Effects of HR Practices. Corporate Reputation Review, 18, 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2015.12 Ifo (2018). Beschäftigungsentwicklung im Handel: Besteht ein Arbeitskräftemangel in der Branche? https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2018-09-rumscheidt-arbeitskraeftemangel-handel-2018- 05-09.pdf Kanfer, R., Frese, M., & Johnson, R. E. (2017). Motivation Related to Work: A Century of Progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 338-355. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000133 Kim, H. J., Knight, D. K., & Crutsinger, C. (2009). Generation Y Employees’ Retail Work Experience: The Mediating Effect of Job Characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 62, 548-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.014 Klaffke, M. (2014). Erfolgsfaktor Generationen-Management—Handlungsansätze für das Personalmanagement. In M. Klaffke (Ed.), Generationen-Management (pp. 3-25). Wiesbaden: Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02325-6_1 Köcher, R., Sommer, M., & Hurrelmann, K. (2015). Die McDonald’s Ausbildungsstudie 2015: Entschlossen unentschlossen. Azubis im Land der (zu vielen) Möglichkeiten. https://www.ifd-allensbach.de/fileadmin/IfD/sonstige_pdfs/McDonald_s_Ausbildungss tudie_2015.pdf Künzel, H. (2013). Erfolgsfaktor Employer Branding: Mitarbeiter binden und die Gen Y gewinnen. Berlin: Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40535-8 Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration Employees: Strategies for Effective Man- agement. Health Care Management, 19, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1097/00126450-200019010-00011 Lee, C.-C., Kao, R.-H., & Lin, C.-J. (2018). A Study on the Factors to Measure Employer Brand: The Case of Undergraduate Senior Students. Chinese Management Studies, 12, 812-832. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2017-0092 Lindgren, E., & Skarped, M. (2008). Employer Attractiveness. A Quantitative Survey of Preferences among Swedish Civil Engineering Students Regarding Future Employers. Bachelor Thesis, Uppsala: Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies. Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. Sixth Edition, Global Edition. Boston Amsterdam Dubai: Pearson. Journal of Service Research, 7, 343-359. Moroko, L., & Uncles, M. (2008). Characteristics of Successful Employer Brands. Journal of Brand Management, 16, 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.4 Parment, A. (2013). Die Generation Y: Mitarbeiter der Zukunft motivieren, integrieren, führen. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag. Ruthus, J. (2013). Employer of Choice der Generation Y: Herausforderungen und Er- folgsfaktoren zur Steigerung der Arbeitgeberattraktivität. Zugl.: Riedlingen, Fern- hochsch., Masterthesis, Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04734-4 Ruthus, J. (2014). Arbeitgeberattraktivität aus Sicht der Generation Y: Handlungsemp- fehlungen für das Human Resources Management. Berlin: Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07918-5 Sengupta, A., Bamel, U., & Singh, P. (2015). Value Proposition Framework: Implications for Employer Branding. Decision, 42, 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-015-0097-x Sharma, R., & Prasad, A. (2018). Employer Brand and Its Unexplored Impact on Intent to Join. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26, 536-566. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2017-1280 Shell (2019). Shell Jugendstudie 2019. https://www.shell.de/ueber-uns/shell-jugendstudie.html Sommer, L. P., Heidenreich, S., & Handrich, M. (2017). War for Talents—How Perceived Organizational Innovativeness Affects Employer Attractiveness. R&D Management, 47, 299-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12230 Steckl, M., Simshäuser, U., & Niederberger, M. (2019). Arbeitgeberattraktivität aus Sicht der Generation Z. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung, 14, 212-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-019-00703-w Stotz, W., & Wedel, A. (2009). Employer Branding: Mit Strategie zum bevorzugten Ar- beitgeber. München: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486592481 Stotz, W., & Wedel, A. (2013). Employer Branding: Mit Strategie zum bevorzugten Ar- beitgeber. 2. Aufl., München: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486754377 Tanwar, K., & Prasad, A. (2016). The Effect of Employer Brand Dimensions on Job Satis- faction: Gender as a Moderator. Management Decision, 54, 854-886. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2015-0343 Tepper, B., Dimotakis, N., Lambert, L., Koopman, J., Matta, F., Man Park, H., & Goo, W. (2018). Examining Follower Responses to Transformational Leadership from a Dy- namic, Person-Environment Fit Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 1343-1368. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0163 Theurer, C. P., Tumasjan, A., Welpe, I. M., & Lievens, F. (2018). Employer Branding: A Brand Equity-Based Literature Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20, 155-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12121 Trendence (2019). Das fordern young professionals. https://www.trendence.com/reports von Walter, B., & Kremmel, D. (2016). Employer Brand Management. Arbeitgebermar- ken aufbauen und steuern. Berlin: Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06938-4 Winter, S. (2000). Quantitative vs. Qualitative Methoden. http://nosnos.synology.me/MethodenlisteUniKarlsruhe/imihome.imi.uni-karlsruhe.de/ nquantitative_vs_qualitative_methoden_b.html Wolf, G. (2014). Employer Branding. Dashöfer. Wolter, U. (2020). “Stern” und Statista ermitteln beste Arbeitgeber Deutschlands. https://www.personalwirtschaft.de/recruiting/employer-branding/artikel/stern-und-sta tista-ermitteln-deutschlands-beste-aarbeitgeber.html Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational Differences in Per- sonality and Motivation. Do They Exist and What Are the Implications for the Workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 878-890. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810904376 Zhu, F., Wang, Z., Yu, Q., Hu, T., Wen, Y., & Liu, Y. (2014). Reconsidering the Dimen- sionality and Measurement of Employer Brand in the Chinese Context. Social Behavior and Personality, 42, 933-948. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.6.933 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/111580 |