Lu, You-Xun and Lai, Ching-Chong (2022): Effects of patent policy on growth and inequality: Exogenous versus endogenous quality improvements.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_111695.pdf Download (901kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study explores the implications of patent protection on growth and inequality under exogenous versus endogenous quality improvements. Our analysis shows that the effects of strengthening patent protection under an endogenous innovation size can be quite different from those under an exogenous innovation size. Under our calibrated parameter values, we find that strengthening patent protection promotes economic growth, raises income inequality, and decreases consumption inequality under exogenous quality improvements. However, in the case of endogenous quality improvements, strengthening patent protection generates an inverted-U effect on economic growth; both income inequality and consumption inequality decrease with the strength of patent protection.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Effects of patent policy on growth and inequality: Exogenous versus endogenous quality improvements |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | innovation, patent protection, economic growth, inequality |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D30 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General |
Item ID: | 111695 |
Depositing User: | Dr You-Xun Lu |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jan 2022 11:54 |
Last Modified: | 27 Jan 2022 11:54 |
References: | Acemoglu, D., 1998. Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1055–1089. Acemoglu, D., 2002. Directed technical change. The Review of Economic Studies, 69, 781–809. Acemoglu, D., and Cao, D., 2015. Innovation by entrants and incumbents. Journal of Economic Theory, 157, 255–294. Acemoglu, D., and Akcigit, U., 2012. Intellectual property rights policy, competition and innovation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 1–42. Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., Bergeaud, A., Blundell, R., and Hémous, D., 2019. Innovation and top income inequality. The Review of Economic Studies, 86, 1–45. Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., and Howitt, P., 2014. What do we learn from Schumpeterian growth theory? Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 2, 515–563. Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–351. Akcigit, U., Hanley, D., and Serrano-Velarde, N., 2021. Back to basics: Basic research spillovers, innovation policy and growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 88, 1–43. Akcigit, U., and Kerr, W., 2018. Growth through heterogeneous innovations. Journal of Political Economy, 126, 1374–1443. Artuç, E., and McLaren, J., 2015. Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility. Journal of International Economics, 97, 278–294. Atkinson, A., 2000. The changing distribution of income: Evidence and explanations. German Economic Review, 1, 3–18. Atkinson, A., 2003. Income inequality in OECD countries: Data and explanations. CESifo Economic Studies, 49, 479–513. Becker, B., 2015. Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29, 917–942. Bessen, J., and Maskin, E., 2009. Sequential innovation, patents, and imitation. RAND Journal of Economics, 40, 611–635. Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., and Williams, H., 2019. A toolkit of policies to promote innovation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33, 163–184. Blundell, R., Pistaferri, L., and Preston, I., 2008. Consumption inequality and partial insurance. American Economic Review, 98, 1887–1921. Bond, E., and Zissimos, B., 2017. Patent breadth in an international setting. Economic Inquiry, 55, 1538–1555. Caballero, R., and Jaffe, A., 2002. How high are the giants’ shoulders: an empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. In: Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M. (Eds.), Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 89–152. Chang, J., Lin, H., Savitski, D., and Tsai, H., 2021. Inflation and inequality in a growing economy with cash and credit goods. Macroeconomic Dynamics, forthcoming. Chou, C.-F., and Talmain, G., 1996. Redistribution and growth: Pareto improvements. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 505–523. Chu, A., and Cozzi, G., 2018. Effects of patents versus R&D subsidies on income inequality. Review of Economic Dynamics, 29, 68–84. Chu, A., Cozzi, G., Fan, H., Furukawa, Y., and Liao, C., 2019. Innovation and inequality in a monetary Schumpeterian model with heterogeneous households and firms. Review of Economic Dynamics, 34, 141–164. Chu, A., and Furukawa, Y., 2011. On the optimal mix of patent instruments. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 1964–1975. Chu, A. C., Fan, H., Furukawa, Y., Kou, Z., and Liu, X., 2021a. Minimum wages, import status, and firms’ innovation: Theory and evidence from China. Economic Inquiry, 59, 441–458. Chu, A., Furukawa, Y., Mallick, S., Peretto, P., and Wang, X., 2021b. Dynamic effects of patent policy on innovation and inequality in a Schumpeterian economy. Economic Theory, 71, 1429–1465. Chu, A., and Pan, S., 2013. The escape-infringement effect of blocking patents on innovation and economic growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 17, 955–969. Cozzi, G., 2007. The Arrow effect under competitive R&D. The BE Journal of Macroeconomics, 7(1), Article 2. Cozzi, G., and Galli, S., 2014. Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 19, 183–219. Cozzi, G., Giordani, P., and Zamparelli, L., 2007. The refoundation of the symmetric equilibrium in Schumpeterian growth models. Journal of Economic Theory, 136, 788–797. Cysne, R., and Turchick, D., 2012. Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth revisited. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36, 851–861. Foellmi, R., and Zweimuller, J., 2006. Income distribution and demand-induced innovations. The Review of Economic Studies, 73, 941–960. Furukawa, Y., 2007. The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, 3644–3670. Futagami, K., and Iwaisako, T., 2007. Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economic Theory, 132, 306–334. Goh, A., and Olivier, J., 2002. Optimal patent protection in a two-sector economy. International Economic Review, 43, 1191–1214. Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 1991. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43–61. Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 2018. Growth, trade, and inequality. Econometrica, 86, 37–83. Hémous, D., and Olsen, M., 2022. The rise of the machines: Automation, horizontal innovation, and income inequality. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 14, 179–223. Hu, R., Yang, Y., and Zheng, Z., 2021. Inflation, endogenous quality increment, and economic growth. Mathematical Social Sciences, 114, 72–86. Huang, W., Lai, C., and Chen, P., 2017. International R&D funding and patent collateral in an R&D-based growth model. International Review of Economics & Finance, 51, 545–561. Huang, C., Wu, Y., Yang, Y., and Zheng, Z., 2022. Monetary Policy in a Schumpeterian Growth Model with Vertical R&D Sectors. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Forthcoming. Iwaisako, T., 2020. Welfare effects of patent protection in a semi-endogenous growth model. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 24, 708–728. Iwaisako, T., and Futagami, K., 2003. Patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economics, 78, 239–258. Iwaisako, T., and Futagami, K., 2013. Patent protection, capital accumulation, and economic growth. Economic Theory, 52, 631–668. Iwaisako, T., and Ohki, K., 2019. Innovation by heterogeneous leaders. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 121, 1673–1704. Jones, C., 1995. R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 759–784. Jones, C., and Kim, J., 2018. A Schumpeterian model of top income inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 126, 1785–1826. Jones, C., and Williams, J., 1998. Measuring the social return to R&D. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1119–1135. Judd, K., 1985. On the performance of patents. Econometrica, 53, 567–586. Krueger, D., and Perri, F., 2006. Does income inequality lead to consumption inequality? Evidence and theory. The Review of Economic Studies, 73, 163–193. Li, C.-W., 2001. On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. Economic Journal, 111, C164–C179. Minniti, A., Parello, C., and Segerstrom, P., 2013. A Schumpeterian growth model with random quality improvements. Economic Theory, 52, 755–791. O’Donoghue, T., and Zweimuller, J., 2004. Patents in a model of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 81–123. Prettner, K., and Strulik, H., 2020. Innovation, automation, and inequality: Policy challenges in the race against the machine. Journal of Monetary Economics, 116, 249–265. Peretto, P., 1998. Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 283–311. Piketty, T., 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press. Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102. Saez, E., and Zucman, G., 2016. Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 519–578. Sampat, B., 2018. A Survey of Empirical Evidence on Patents and Innovation. NBER Working Paper 25383. Segerstrom, P., Anant, T., and Dinopoulos, E., 1990. A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 80, 1077–1091. Silverberg, G., and Verspagen, B., 2007. The size distribution of innovations revisited: An application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance. Journal of Econometrics, 139, 318–339. Yang, Y., 2018. On the optimality of IPR protection with blocking patents. Review of Economic Dynamics, 27, 205–230. Yang, Y., 2021. Welfare effects of patent protection in a growth model with R&D and capital accumulation. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 25, 579–602. Zheng, Z., Huang, C., and Yang, Y., 2020a. Patent protection, innovation, and technology transfer in a Schumpeterian economy. European Economic Review, 129, 103531. Zheng, Z., Mishra, T., and Yang, Y., 2020b. Inflation and income inequality in a variety-expansion growth model with menu costs. Economics Letters, 194, 109373. Zweimuller, J., 2000. Schumpeterian entrepreneurs meet Engel’s law: The impact of inequality on innovation-driven growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 185–206. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/111695 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Effects of patent policy on growth and inequality: A perspective of exogenous and endogenous quality improvements. (deposited 22 Dec 2021 09:15)
- Effects of patent policy on growth and inequality: Exogenous versus endogenous quality improvements. (deposited 27 Jan 2022 11:54) [Currently Displayed]