Long, Dara (2008): Purchasing Power Parity and Real Exchange Rate in Japan.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_11173.pdf Download (490kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines the validity of both the short-run and long-run purchasing power parity (PPP) hypotheses in Japan using two estimation methods, namely, a unit root test and an Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) cointegration test. Some important findings are obtained from our analysis. The first test reveals the mean reversion of real exchange rate (RER) in the long-run. On the other hand, from the second test, we found that there is a strongly robust long-run PPP relationship but no significant short-run PPP relationship. Furthermore, unlike the previous literature, this paper confirms the stability of the estimated results by CUSUM and CUSUMQ tests. Overall, the results suggest that PPP hypothesis in Japan strongly holds for the long-run while not for the short-run.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Purchasing Power Parity and Real Exchange Rate in Japan |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | PPP; Real Exchange Rate; Unit Root; ARDL to cointegration |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F41 - Open Economy Macroeconomics F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange |
Item ID: | 11173 |
Depositing User: | Dara Long |
Date Deposited: | 19 Oct 2008 07:19 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 23:21 |
References: | [1] Adler, M. and B. Lehmann, 1983, Deviations from Purchasing Power Parity in the long run. Journal of Finance, 38, 1471-87. [2] Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and A. B. M. Nasir, 2004, ARDL Approach to Test the Productivity Bias Hypothesis. Review of Development Economics, 8(3), 483-488. [3] Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and S. Chomsisengphet, 2002, Stability of M2 Money Demand Function in Industrial Countries. Applied Economics, 34, 2075-2083. [4] Baharumshah, A. Z. and M. Ariff, 1997, Purchasing Power Parity in South East Asia Economies: A Cointegration Approach, Asian Economic Journal, 11(2), 141-153. [5] Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., and J. M. Evans, 1975, Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships over Time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 37, 149-192. [6] Coakley, J., Flood, R., Fuertes, A., M., and M. P. Taylor, 2005, Long-run Purchasing Power Parity and the theory of general relativity: the first tests. Journal of International Money and Finance, 24, 293-316. [7] Choudhry, T., 2005, Asian Currency crisis and the generalized PPP: evidence from the far east, Asian Economic Journal, 21, 1023-31. [8] Enders, W., 1988, ARIMA and cointegration tests of PPP under fixed and flexible exchange rate regimes. Reviews of Economics and Statistics, 70, 504-8. [9] Fraser, P., Webster, A. and M. P. Taylor, 1991, An empirical Examination of long-run Purchasing Power Parity as a theory of international commodity arbitrage. Applied Economics, 23, 1749-60. [10] International Financial Statistics CD-ROM, 2007, International Monetary Fund. [11] Lathian, J. R. and M. P. Taylor, 1997, Real Exchange Rate Behavior: the Recent Float from the Perspective of the Past Two Centuries. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 488-510. [12] Layton, A. P. and J. P. Stark, 1990, Cointegration as an empirical test of Purchasing Power Parity. Journal of Macroeconomics, 12, 125-36. [13] Lopes, C., Murray, C. J., and Papell, D.H., 2005, State of the art unit root tests and purchasing power parity. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 37, 361-70. [14] Mark, N., 1990, Real and nominal exchange rates in the long run: an empirical investigation. Journal of International Economics, 28, 115-36. [15] O`Connell, P. G. J., 1998, The overvaluation of Purchasing Power Parity. Journal of International Economics, 44, 1-19. [16] Papell, D. H., 1997, Searching for stationary: Purchasing Power Parity under the current float. Journal of International Economics, 43, 313-32. [17] Papell, D. H. and H. Theodoridis, 1998, Increasing evidence of Purchasing Power Parity over the current float. Journal of International Money and Finance, 17, 41-50. [18] Pesaran, M. H. and B. Pesaran, 1997, Microfit 4.1 (Window Version). Oxford University Press. [19] Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and R. J. Smith, 1996, Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. DEA working paper 9622, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge. [20] Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. and R. J. Smith, 2001, Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326. [21] Sarno, L. and M. P. Taylor, 2002, Purchasing Power Parity and the Real Exchange Rate. International Monetary Fund Staff Paper, 49, 65-105. [22] Taylor, A. M. and M. P. Taylor, 2004, The Purchasing Power Parity Debate. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(4), 135-158. [23] Taylor, M. P., 1988, An empirical examination of long run Purchasing Power Parity using cointegration techniques. Applied Economics, 20, 1369-81. [24] Taylor, M. P., 2003, Purchasing Power Parity. Review of International Economics, 11(3), 436-452. [25] Taylor, M. P., 2006, Real Exchange Rate and Purchasing Power Parity: mean-reversion in economic thought. Applied Financial Economics, 16, pp. 1-17. [26] Taylor, M. P. and Sarno, L., 1998, The behavior of real exchange rates during the post-Bretton Woods period. Journal of International Economics, 46, 281-312. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/11173 |