Экономическая координация как результат координирующего поведения агентов

Parinov, Sergey (2022): Экономическая координация как результат координирующего поведения агентов.

Abstract

This study is based on the hypothesis that human's natural abilities to take into account the activities of other people manifest themselves as a coordinating behavior, which in the economy is realized in the form of a purposeful coordinating activity of human agents. The instrument of coordination, in this case, is the individual and collective mental models of the agents, which concept is being developed by the Cognitive Science. Coordinating activity is the fundamental process of coordination and is present in all coordinating economic systems. On this methodological basis, an approach is proposed that explains the content of coordination processes in the economy, and the formation of a hybrid structure from the forms of coordination. By creating coordination processes, agents seek to maximize the gain from their joint activities. As a result, a certain structure is formed in the economy from the main forms of coordination: contractual (network), hierarchical, stigmergy, and a form based on rules. The features of these main forms of coordination are considered, including the conditions for the emergence of hybrid forms. It has been established that the market coordination process is a symbiosis of the main forms of coordination working together as a complex hybrid. An analysis of the properties of the system of economic coordination processes showed that they critically depend on the nature of communications between the participants in joint activities and on their “computational capabilities”. The transfer of agent communications to the virtual environment of the information and communication technologies and the use of computers to increase the calculation capabilities of the agents for coordinating their activities can lead to a partial merger of the main forms of coordination, as well as to the creation of coordination processes without the use of a monetary and financial system. The social significance of research and development aimed at improving the processes of economic coordination is discussed as one of the most important current tasks of mankind. A possible research program is being considered to scientifically support this new mankind task.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Economic coordination as a coordinating behavior of human agents
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: coordinating behavior; economic coordinating activity; mental model; content of economic coordination; structure of coordination processes; properties of the coordination system; improvement of the coordination system; new mankind task; research program
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; P - Economic Systems > P0 - General

References

Алчиан, А., & Демсец, Г. (2004). Производство, информационные издержки и экономическая организация. Истоки: Экономика в контексте истории и культуры.–М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 166-207. https://25hse.ucoz.ru/_ld/0/3_al4ian-demsetz.pdf

Власова Н.Ю., Молокова Е.Л. Механизмы координации стейкхолдеров рынка высшего образования: теоретические подходы к идентификации // Управленец. 2019. Т. 10. №2. С. 21–30. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2019-10-2-3. http://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/78/3.pdf

Дементьев, В. Е., Евсюков, С. Г., & Устюжанина, Е. В. (2017). Гибридные формы организации бизнеса: к вопросу об анализе межфирменных взаимодействий. Российский журнал менеджмента, 15(1).

Паринов С.И. (2021). Основания общей теории социально-экономической координации. // Электронный препринт Соционет, с. 39. [Parinov, S. (2021). Foundation of a general theory of socio-economic coordination. // Preprint at Socionet, pp. 39. In Russian] https://socionet.ru/publication.xml?h=repec:rus:frzyhd:13

Паринов С.И. (2020). Общая теория согласования социально-экономической деятельности: коллективные ментальные модели. // Электронный препринт Соционет, с. 35. [Parinov, S. (2020). General theory of socio-economic coordination activity: shared mental models. Preprint at Socionet, pp. 35. In Russian] https://socionet.ru/publication.xml?h=repec:rus:frzyhd:1

Паринов С.И. (2002). К теории сетевой экономики. Новосибирск, ИЭОПП СО РАН, с. 165. [Parinov, S. (2002). Towards a theory of the networked economy. Novosibirsk, IEIE SB RAS, pp. 165. In Russian] https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=O1vmIgAAAEAJ

Полтерович, В. М. (2018). К общей теории социально-экономического развития. Часть 1. География, институты или культура? Вопросы экономики, (11), 5-26.

Ходаков, В. Е., Соколова, Н. А., & Кирийчук, Д. Л. (2014). О развитии основ теории координации сложных систем. Проблеми інформаційних технологій, (2), 12-21. http://epr.kntu.net.ua/136/1/02.pdf

Adler, P. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. // Organization science, 12(2), 215-234. http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~padler/research/MHT-2.pdf

Badke-Schaub, P., Neumann, A., Lauche, K., & Mohammed, S. (2007). Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration?. // CoDesign, 3(1), 5-20.

Crowston, K., Rubleske, J., & Howison, J. (2015). Coordination theory: A ten-year retrospective. // In Human-computer interaction and management information systems: Foundations (pp. 134-152). https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1079&context=istpub

Elliott M. (2016) Stigmergic Collaboration: A Framework for Understanding and Designing Mass Collaboration. // In: Cress U., Moskaliuk J., Jeong H. (eds) Mass Collaboration and Education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 16. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_4

Elliot, M. (2006). Stigmergic collaboration: The evolution of group work. M/C Journal, Vol. 9, 2. http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0605/03-elliott.php

Heylighen, F. (2016). Stigmergy as a universal coordination mechanism I: Definition and components. Cognitive Systems Research, 38, 4-13.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive science, 4(1), 71-115.

Mantzavinos, C., North, D. C., & Shariq, S. (2004). Learning, institutions, and economic performance. Perspectives on politics, 2(1), 75-84. https://philarchive.org/archive/MANLIA-3

Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. // ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 26(1), 87-119. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/174666.174668

Marsh, L., & Onof, C. (2008). Stigmergic epistemology, stigmergic cognition. // Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1-2), 136-149. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10004/1/3z2fx4r7prqwob3vfdq.pdf

Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. // Journal of applied psychology, 85(2), 273.

Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. // Journal of management, 36(4), 876-910.

Mullainathan, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2000). Behavioral economics. NBER Working Paper 7948, p. 13. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w7948/w7948.pdf

Powell, W. W. (1991). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. ThFr91, 265-276. http://habibisir.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2016/09/Neither-Market-Nor-Hierarchy-Network-Forms-of-Organizations.pdf

Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(2), 229-252. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4d1f/4ffdf8359be1c17773fc0ce63f223a844b9b.pdf

Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “big five” in teamwork? // Small group research, 36(5), 555-599.

Thaler, Richard H. (2016). "Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future." American Economic Review, 106 (7): 1577-1600. DOI: 10.1257/aer.106.7.1577 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3854/52814f6b9311d7d5bb7c747c5b98f69ef49b.pdf

Ustyuzhanina, Y. V., & Komarova, I. P. (2018). The digital revolution influence on development of the network economy. Journal of new economy, 19(6).

Weigand, H., van der Poll, F., & de Moor, A. (2003). Coordination through communication. In Proceedings of the 8th International Working Conference on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modelling. Tilburg, The Netherlands. https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/517398/LAP2003poll.pdf