International trade and environmental corporate social responsibility

Bárcena-Ruiz, Juan Carlos and Sagasta, Amagoia (2021): International trade and environmental corporate social responsibility.

Abstract

This paper analyzes firms’ incentives to engage in environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) in an international market under imperfect competition. We find that in the absence of environmental taxes firms do not adopt ECSR. However, the implementation of environmental taxes by governments encourages firms to adopt ECSR under local damage. Consumers, producers, and environmentalists are better off if firms decide to be environmentally responsible than if they decide not to. We also find that the decision to adopt ECSR depends on transboundary pollution. Under global damage firms engage in ECSR only if they are highly concerned about the environment. This means that the existence of transboundary pollution negatively affects the incentives of firms to be environmentally friendly. Finally, we find that when governments cooperatively determine their environmental taxes, firms engage in ECSR under both local and global damage. Thus, under global damage firms have greater incentives to be environmentally friendly when governments cooperate on environmental policies than when they do not.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Environmental corporate social responsibility; environmental tax; international trade; transboundary pollution.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

Albareda, L., Lozano, J M., Ysa, T., 2007. Public Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 391-407.

Anton, W.R.Q., Deltas, G., Khanna, M., 2004. Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48 (1), 632-654.

Antweiler, W., 2003. How Effective Is Green Regulatory Threat? The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 93(2), 436–441.

Arora, S., Cason, T., 1995. An Experiment in Voluntary Environmental Regulation: Participation in EPA's 33/50 Program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(3), 271-286.

Bárcena-Ruiz, J.C., Campo, M.L., 2012. Partial cross-ownership and strategic environmental policy. Resource and Energy Economics 34, 198-210.

Bárcena-Ruiz, J.C., Garzón, M.B., 2014. Multiproduct Firms and Environmental Policy Coordination. Environmental and Resource Economics, 59 (3), 407-431.

Bárcena-Ruiz, J.C., Campo, M.L., 2017. Taxes versus standards under cross-ownership. Resource and Energy Economics, 50, 36-50.

Bárcena-Ruiz, J.C., Sagasta, A. 2021. Cross-ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility. The Manchester School. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12363.

Baron, D.P., 2001. Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(1), 7-45.

Barrett, S., 1994. Strategic Environmental Policy and International Trade. Journal of Public Economics, 54, 325-338.

Borck, J.C., Coglianese, C., 2009. Voluntary Environmental Programs: Assessing Their Effectiveness. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34 (1), 305-324.

Boulouta, I., Pitelis, C.N., 2014. Who Needs CSR? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on National Competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 349-364.

Campbell, J. L., 2007. Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967.

Chang, Y.M., Chen, H.Y., Wang, L.F.S., Wu, S.J., 2012. Corporate social responsibility and international competition: a welfare analysis. Review of International Economics, 22 (3), 625-638.

Chuang, S.P., Huang, S.J., 2018. The Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility on Environmental Performance and Business Competitiveness: The Mediation of Green Information Technology Capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 991-1009.

Coluccia, D., Fontana, S., Solimene, S., 2018. Does Institutional Context Affect CSR Disclosure? A Study on Eurostoxx 50. Sustainability, 10(8), 2823.

Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., Yang, Y. G., 2012. Non Financial Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy: International Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Accounting Review, 87(3), 723-759.

Dong, Q., Bárcena-Ruiz, J.C., 2020. Corporate social responsibility and disclose of R&D knowledge. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. DOI:10.1080/10438599.2020.1741186.

Dong, Q., Bárcena-Ruiz, J.C., 2021. Corporate social responsibility and partial privatisation of state holding corporations. Journal of Economics, 132 (2), 223-250.

Ericsson, K., 2006. Evaluation of the Danish Voluntary Agreements on Energy Efficiency in Trade and Industry. http://www.aid-ee.org/documents/011Danishvoluntaryagreements.

European Commission, 2001. Green Paper: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. COM (2001) 366-final, Brussels.

Fanti, L., Buccella, D., 2020. Strategic trade policy with socially concerned firms. International Review of Economics, 67, 269-292.

Fanti, L., Buccella, D., 2019. Corporate social responsibility in a unionised duopoly. Estudios de Economía, 46 (2), 227-244.

Fukuda, K., Ouchida, Y., 2020. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the environment: Does CSR increase emissions? Energy Economics, 92, 104933.

García-Sánchez, I. M., Cuadrado- Ballesteros, B., Frias-Aceituno, J. V., 2016. Impact of the Institutional Macro Context on the Voluntary Disclosure of CSR Information. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 15-35.

García, A., Leal, M., Lee, SH., 2018. Time-inconsistent environmental policies with a consumer-friendly firm: tradable permits versus emission tax. International Review of Economics and Finance, 58, 523-537.

Helfand, G.E., 1999. Standards versus taxes in pollution control. Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, Ch. 15, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA, USA. Edited by J. van der Bergh.

Hirose, K., Lee, S.H., Matsumura, T., 2020. Noncooperative and cooperative environmental corporate social responsibility. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 176, 1-23.

Ino, H., Matsumura, T., 2021. Optimality of emission pricing policies based on emission intensity targets under imperfect competition. Energy Economics, 98, 105238.

Kim, S.L., Lee, S.H., Matsumura, T., 2019. Corporate social responsibility and privatization policy in a mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics 128, 67-89.

Kitzmueller, M., Shimshack, J., 2012. Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50 (1), 51-84.

KPMG, 2017. The road ahead. The KPGM Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. KPMG international. Available at: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf

Lambertini, L., Tampieri, A., 2015. Incentives, performance and desirability of socially responsible firms in a Cournot oligopoly. Economic Modelling, 50, 40-48.

Leal, M., Garcia, A., Lee, S.H., 2018. The timing of environmental tax policy with a consumer-friendly firm. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 59, 25-43.

Leal, M., Garcia, A., Lee, S.H., 2019. Excess burden of taxation and environmental policy mix with a consumer-friendly firm. The Japanese Economic Review, 70, 517-536.

Lee, S.H., Park, C.H., 2019. Eco-firms and the sequential adoption of environmental corporate social responsibility in the managerial delegation. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 20170043.

Lioui, A., Sharma, Z., 2012. Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Disentangling direct and indirect effects. Ecological Economics, 78, 100-111.

Liu, C.C., Wang, L.F.S., Lee, S.H., 2015. Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a differentiated duopoly market. Economics Letters, 129, 108-111.

Lu, J., Ren, L., Lin, W., He, Y., Streimikis, J., 2019. Policies to promote corporate social responsibility (CSR) and assessment of CSR impacts. Business Administration and Management, 22 (1), 82-98.

Margolis, J.D., Elfenbein, H.A., Walsh, J.P., 2007. Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA.

Markusen, J.R., 1997. Costly Pollution Abatement, Competitiveness and Plant Location Decisions. Resource and Energy Economics, 19, 299-320.

Maxwell, J.W., Lyon, T.P., Hackett, S.C., 2000. Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism. The Journal of Law & Economics, 43(2), 583-617.

Planer-Friedrich, L., Sahm, M., 2020. Strategic corporatesocial responsibility, imperfect competition, and market concentration. Journal of Economics, 129, 79-101.

Potoski, M., Prakash, A., 2005. Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory performance. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 235-48.

Requate, T., 2006. Environmental policy under imperfect competition. The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2006/2007. A Survey of Current Issues, Edward Elgar.

Ulph, A., 1996. Environmental Policy and International Trade when Governments and Producers act Strategically. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 256-281..

Wang, C., 2021. Monopoly with Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Differentiation, and Environmental R&D: Implications for Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 287, 125433.

Wang, L.F.S., Wang, Y.C., Zhao, F., 2012. Tariff policy and welfare in an international duopoly with consumer-friendly initiative. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64 (1), 56-64.

Wu, W., Ullah, R., Shah, S.J., 2020. Linking Corporate Environmental Performance to Financial Performance of Pakistani Firms: The Roles of Technological capability and Public awareness. Sustainability, 12(4), 1446.

Xu, L., Lee, S.H., 2019. Tariffs and privatization policy in a bilateral trade with corporate social responsibility. Economic Moelling, 80, 339-351.

Xu, L., Lee, S.H., 2018. The timing of environmental policies with excess burden of taxation in free-entry mixed markets. International Review of Economics and Finance, 58, 1-13.