Causes behind Tenancy Contract among the Marginal Farmers of West Bengal, India and Its’ Impact on their Livelihood

Kundu, Amit and Goswami, Pubali (2021): Causes behind Tenancy Contract among the Marginal Farmers of West Bengal, India and Its’ Impact on their Livelihood. Published in: Artha Vijnana , Vol. LXIV,, No. No.1, March, 2022 pp. 1-19 (31 March 2022): pp. 1-19.

Abstract

The basic objective of this paper is to identify the possible factors which influence the marginal farmer households of West Bengal to go for tenancy contracts. In our study area, the target group is marginal farmer households where the only fixed-rent contract is observed, and all the contracts are verbal. Comparatively big landowners among the marginal farmer households where lack of motivation is observed among the younger generations to pursue agricultural activities for their livelihood and have higher earnings from different non-farm activities influence them to lease out the land. On the contrary, landless or the marginal farmer households owned very small size of land are more eager to take land in a lease for cultivation. The availability of family labour force among these types of households and earnings from alternative sources play an important role during the time of taking such a decision. After applying Heckman’s two-step treatment effect models, it is observed that marginal farmer households who lease out land are economically better off than the marginal farmer households who are not interested in any such tenancy contract. Besides that, it is also observed that farm households even after taking land in the lease are economically worse-off than the farm households who are not interested in any tenancy contract. But most of the marginal farmer households whichever type are living below the poverty line.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Agriculture, Tenancy Contract, Marginal farmers, Impact Evaluation, Poverty
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C31 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions ; Social Interaction Models; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R23 - Regional Migration ; Regional Labor Markets ; Population ; Neighborhood Characteristics

References

Bliss, C.J. and Nicholas Stern (1982), Palanpur: The Economy of an Indian Village, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Chattopadhyay, M. and A. Sengupta (2001), Tenancy Inefficiency: A Study based on West Bengal Agriculture, Economic and Political Weekly, 36(5): 497-502, February 3-16.

Government of India (2010-11, 1015-16), Agricultural Census (2010-11, 1015-16), Published by Agricultural Cooperation and Famer’s Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India

Goyal S.K. and R.N. Pandey (2000), Temporal Changes in Land-lease Market in Haryana, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(3): July-September.

James, J. Heckman (1976), The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple estimator of Such Models, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5/4 475-492.

James, Kai-sing Kung (2002), Off-farm Labour Markets and the Emergence of Land Rental Markets in Rural China, Journal of Comparative Economics, 30(2): 395-414.

Kaur, M. and S. Singh (2011), Agricultural Land Lease Market in Gurdaspur District of Punjab, Journal of Agricultural Development Policy; 21(2): 51-60.

Kundu, A. and S. Das (2019), Push and (or) Pull? Drivers of Labour Force Participation in Indian Agriculture, Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 62(3): 413-430, September.

Liesbet, Vranken, Johan Swinnen (2006), Land Rental Markets in Transition: Theory and Evidence from Hungary, World Development, 34(3): 481-500.

Lieten, G.K. (1994), For a New Debate on West Bengal, Economic and Political Weekly, 29(29): 1835-1838.

Mani, G. (2016), Model Agriculture Land Leasing Act, 2016: Some Observations, Economic and Political Weekly, 51(42): page no, 15th October.

Parthasarathy, G. and D.S. Prasad (1974), Response to an Impact of HYV Rice According to Land Size and Tenure in a Delta Village A.P. India, Developing Economics June.

Rao, Hanumantha and A. Gulati (1994), Indian Agriculture: Emerging Perspective and Policy Issues, Economic and Political Weekly, December 31,. pp. A158 – A169.

Sanzidur, Rahman (2010), Determinants of Agricultural Land Rental Market Transactions in Bngladesh, Land Use Policy, 27(3): 957-964.

Shaheen Akter, et. al. (2006), Land Rental Market in India: Efficiency and Equity Considerations, Annual Meeting of Agricultural Economists Queensland Australia August

Sharma, H.R. (2000), Tenancy Relations in Rural India; A Temporal and Cross-Sectional Analysis, Indian Journal of Agricultural. Economics, 55(3): 295-307.

Srivastava. R. (1989), Tenancy Contracts during Transition. A Study Based on Field Workers in Uttar Pradesh (a), Journal of Peasant Studies, 16(3): 339-349.

Taslim, Mohammad A. and Farid U. Ahmed (1992), An Analysis of Land Leasing in Bangladesh Agriculture, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40(3): 615–628.