The practicality of regional import substitution as a strategy for sustainable development in the Caribbean

Alleyne, Antonio and Lorde, Troy and Moore, Winston (2022): The practicality of regional import substitution as a strategy for sustainable development in the Caribbean. Published in: Trade and development issues in CARICOM: Key considerations for navigating development : pp. 56-71.

Abstract

It has long been apparent that economic development in the Caribbean could not be sustained on the basis of traditional agricultural exports. Since the 1960s the debate has centered on what should take their place, and what mechanism should be used to achieve, at least in part, sustainable development. One reoccurring topic is the notion of import substitution. Contrary to previous literature, this study evaluates the feasibility of import substitution at the regional rather than at the country level on the basis that it is not economically feasible to supply all the goods that a country may consume on its own. To evaluate the feasibility of this approach, we use a trade database that matches imports (consumption) and exports (production capabilities) of various Caribbean countries. We then conduct counterfactual simulations of the feasibility of import substitution if all of the trade overlaps within the region are exploited. We discuss the implications that this might have for intra-regional trade, economic activity and employment. The overall feasibility of such an approach is also assessed.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: trade, import substitution, Caribbean, CARICOM
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation

References

Amsden, A. 2004. Import substitution in high-tech industries: Prebisch lives in Asia! CEPAL Review 82: 75–89.

Baer, W. 1972. Import substitution and industrialisation in Latin America: Experiences and interpretations. Latin American Research Review 7(1): 95–122.

Beckford, C., and D. Campbell. 2013. Tourism, local agriculture, and food security in the Caribbean. In: C. Beckford and D. Campbell (eds.) Domestic Food Production and Food Security in the Caribbean, pp. 197–208. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bruton, H. 1989. Import substitution. In: Hollis Chenery and T. N. Srinivasan (eds.) Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 2, pp. 1601–1644. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Bruton, H. J. 1998. A reconsideration of import substitution. Journal of Economic Literature 36(2): 903–936.

da Silva, G. F., J. F. da Silva, A. da Rocha, and L. A. Dib. 2015. Propensity for internationalization: A study of Brazilian software firms. In: International Business in Latin America, pp. 166–185. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Finger, J. M., and M. E. Kreinin. 1979. A measure of “export similarity” and its possible use. Economic Inquiry 89(356): 905–912.

Girvan, N. 2012. “Caribbean Community: The Elusive Quest for Economic Integration.” In: K. Hall and Cyrtle C. (eds), pp. 4–26 Regional Integration: Key to Caribbean Survival and Prosperity. Bloomington, IN: Trafford Publishing.

Girvan, N. 2012. A single development vision. In: Kenneth Hall and Myrtle Chuck-A-Sang (eds) Regional Integration: Key to Caribbean Survival and Prosperity, chapter 8. Bloomington, IN: Trafford.

Henry, M. 1981. Industrial Development Strategies in Caribbean Countries: Jamaica. Port of Spain: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

Irwin, D. A. 2002. Interpreting the tariff-growth correlation of the late 19th century. American Economic Review 92(2): 165–169.

Melo, A., and A. Rodriguez-Clare. 2006. Productive Development Policies and Supporting Institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

Moore, W., and A. Glean. 2016. Foreign exchange reserve adequacy and exogenous shocks. Applied Economics 48(6): 490–501.

Puga, D., and A. J. Venables. 1999. Agglomeration and economic development: Import substitution vs. trade liberalisation. The Economic Journal 109(455), 292–311.