Astarita, Caterina and Alcidi, Cinzia (2022): Did the COVID-19 pandemic impact income distribution?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_113851.pdf Download (737kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This analysis aims to explore how employee income distribution performed during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic; it further aims to compare it with a pre-pandemic scenario (2019) and with the financial and the sovereign debt crisis. By referring to the EU Labour Force Survey (LFS) database for six EU Member States (Denmark, Estonia, Greece, Ireland, Italy, and Portugal), and by using transition matrices and a selection of mobility indices as empirical tools, the direction and the magnitude of the movement across quantiles experienced by employees are explored. For each of the years under scrutiny, the transition across quintiles is computed between two very close periods (e.g. from one quarter to another). Sudden changes in the structure of the transition matrices and the value of the respective mobility indicators, when observed in comparison with a ‘benchmark’ year, may be interpreted either as a shock to the economic system, or the (counter) effect of automatic stabilisers and discretionary public policy measures (and as a combination of the two). The direction and the magnitude of the change may depend on different factors, including the kind of crisis, labour market and market income response, along with the design and timing of public policy discretionary cushioning measures. This conclusion emerges from the comparison of results collected for the COVID-19 crisis with those of the Great Recession: Two different kinds of crisis, two different sets of transmission mechanisms from the origin of the crisis to the real economy, two different responses of the labour market and of the public policy intervention. During the COVID-19 crisis, the overall level of income mobility increased, while during the financial crisis and sovereign debt crisis it decreased. The reason lies both in the different magnitude of flows from employment to unemployment and in the type and timing of the measures taken. As for the COVID-19 pandemic vs a pre-pandemic scenario, in-depth observation of the transition matrices and of the relative mobility indices suggests an increase of the overall mobility that is explained by specific movements of the ‘upward’ and ‘downward’ movers, as well as from the patterns followed by the proportion of individuals belonging to the single quantiles. When the figures for different indicators are broken down, it seems that there is a general worsening condition of females compared to males, of the youngest (16-29-year-olds) and of employees without tertiary education (ISCED 6-8).
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Did the COVID-19 pandemic impact income distribution? |
English Title: | Did the COVID-19 pandemic impact income distribution? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | COVID-19 pandemic, labour income, income distribution, income mobility, transition matrices, income mobility index, quantile analysis. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H12 - Crisis Management H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers |
Item ID: | 113851 |
Depositing User: | Caterina Astarita |
Date Deposited: | 22 Jul 2022 12:42 |
Last Modified: | 26 Jul 2022 08:07 |
References: | Adams-Prassl, A., Boneva, T., Golin, M. and Rauh, C. (2020) ‘Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys’, Journal of Public economics, 189, p. 104245. Almeida, V., Barrios, S., Christl, M., Poli, S.D. and Tumino, A. (2020) Households’ income and the cushioning effect of fiscal policy measures during the Great Lockdown. JRC Working Papers on Taxation and Structural Reforms. Almeida, V., Barrios, S., Christl, M., De Poli, S.D., Tumino, A. and van der Wielen, W. (2021) ‘The impact of covid-19 on households income in the EU’, The Journal of Economic Inequality, 19(3), pp. 413–431. Beirne, K., Doorley, K., Regan, M., Roantree, B. and Tuda, D. (2020) The potential costs and distributional effect of COVID-19 related unemployment in Ireland. Budget Perspectives. Belot, M., Choi, S., Tripodi, E., Broek-Altenburg, E. van den, Jamison, J.C. and Papageorge, N.W. (2021) ‘Unequal consequences of Covid 19: representative evidence from six countries’, Review of Economics of the Household, 19(3), pp. 769–783. Bennedsen, M., Larsen, B., Schmutte, I. and Scur, D. (2020) Preserving job matches during the COVID-19 pandemic: firm-level evidence on the role of government aid. GLO Discussion Paper. Bibby, J. (1975) ‘Methods of measuring mobility’, Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 9(2), pp. 107–136. Bonacini, L., Gallo, G. and Scicchitano, S. (2021) ‘Working from home and income inequality: risks of a ‘new normal’with COVID-19’, Journal of population economics, 34(1), pp. 303–360. Brunori, P., Maitino, M.L., Ravagli, L., and Sciclone, N. (2020) Distant and unequal: lockdown and inequalities in Italy. DISEI, Università degli Studi di Firenze. Carta, F. (2020) ‘Timely Indicators for Inequality and Poverty Using the Italian Labour Force Survey’, Social Indicators Research, 149(1), pp. 41–65. Cantó, O., Figari, F., Fiorio, C.V., Kuypers, S., Marchal, S., Romaguera‐de‐la‐Cruz, M., Tasseva, I.V. and Verbist, G. (2021) Welfare resilience at the onset of the covid-19 pandemic in a selection of european countries: Impact on public finance and household incomes. EUROMOD Working Paper Series. Carta, F. and De Philippis, M. (2021) ‘The impact of the COVID-19 shock on labour income inequality: Evidence from Italy’, Bank of Italy Occasional Paper [Preprint], (606). Chattopadhyay, N., Dewanji, A. and Roy, B.K. (2019) ‘Re-examining Bartholomew’s Index of Social Mobility: Some New Derivations with Statistical Inference’, Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin, 71(2), pp. 99–112. Christl, M. et al. (2021) The cushioning effect of fiscal policy in the EU during the COVID-19 pandemic. Joint Research Centre (Seville site). Christl, M., Poli, S.D., Figari, F., Hufkens, T., Leventi, C., Papini, A. and Tumino, A. (2022) Monetary compensation schemes during the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for household incomes, liquidity constraints and consumption across the EU. GLO Discussion Paper. Clark, A., d’Ambrosio, C. and Lepinteur, A. (2021) ‘The fall in income inequality during COVID-19 in five European countries’. Doorley, K., Callan, T. and Savage, M. (2021) ‘What drove income inequality in EU crisis countries during the Great Recession?’, Fiscal Studies, 42(2), pp. 319–343. Drahokoupil, J. and Müller, T. (2021) ‘Job retention schemes in Europe: a lifeline during the Covid-19 pandemic’, ETUI Research Paper-Working Paper [Preprint]. Eurostat (2021) EU Labour Force Survey. Explanatory Notes. Eurostat Luxembourg. Eurostat, N. (2021) ‘EU Labour Force Survey database user guide’. Figari, F. and Fiorio, C. (2020) ‘Welfare resilience in the immediate aftermath of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy’. Mack, A., Lengerer, A. and Dickhaut, T. (2016) ‘Anonymized EU-LFS microdata for research: background, resources, and introduction to data handling’. Menta, G. (2021) ‘Poverty in the COVID-19 Era: Real-time Data Analysis on Five European Countries’, in Research on Economic Inequality: Poverty, Inequality and Shocks. Emerald Publishing Limited. Möhring, K., Weiland, A., Reifenscheid, M., Naumann, E., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Cornesse, C. and Blom, A.G. (2021) ‘Inequality in employment trajectories and their socio-economic consequences during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany’. Morgan, M. and Neef, T. (2020) What’s New About Income Inequality in Europe (1980-2019)? World Inequality Lab. O’Donoghue, C., Sologon, D.M., Kyzyma, I. and McHale, J. (2020) ‘Modelling the distributional impact of the COVID‐19 crisis’, Fiscal Studies, 41(2), pp. 321–336. Palomino, J.C., Rodríguez, J.G. and Sebastian, R. (2020) ‘Wage inequality and poverty effects of lockdown and social distancing in Europe’, European economic review, 129, p. 103564. Paul, S. (2020) ‘A measure of Income Mobility based on Transition Matrices and application to China and the United States’, Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 25(3), pp. 389–401. Prais, S.J. (1955) ‘Measuring social mobility’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 118(1), pp. 56–66. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/113851 |