PASSAGE DES BUDGETS DE MOYENS AUX BUDGETS DE PROGRAMMES : QUELS IMPACTS SUR L’ECONOMIE SENEGALAISE ?

Diagne, Youssoupha Sakrya and Faye, Issa (2018): PASSAGE DES BUDGETS DE MOYENS AUX BUDGETS DE PROGRAMMES : QUELS IMPACTS SUR L’ECONOMIE SENEGALAISE ? Published in: dpee.sn

Abstract

This paper anticipates the impacts of program based budgeting on senegalese economy. According to the PEFA evaluation, Senegal is eligible to implement such reform. Results from an Intertemporal dynamic CGE model show an overall positive impact of the reform on the senegalese economy. Simulations assume that targeted outputs are met. The reform would repectively improve economic growth, private investment, households consumption and well-being would by 0,57%, 0,83%, 0,65% et 26,9%, after a decade of implementation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Program based budgeting; What implications for the senegalese economy?
• Language: French
• Keywords: budget systems, well-being, efficiency, CGE models
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C68 - Computable General Equilibrium Models; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H61 - Budget ; Budget Systems; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being

References

• Abel, A. B., and O. J. Blanchard (1983), An Intertemporal Model of Saving and Investment, Econometrica, 51(3):675-692.

• Arrow, K. (1951). « Social Choice and Individual Values », Yale University Press, 1951 . • Bellamy, S., et Kluvers, R. (1995), « Program Budgeting in Australian Local Government: A Study of Implementation and Outcomes », Financial Accountability And Management, Vol. 11, No.1, pp. 39–56.

• Brumby, J., Edmonds, P., et Honeywell, K. (1996), « Effects of Public Sector Financial Reform (FMR) in New Zealand », unpublished paper presented to Australasian Evaluation Society Conference, August 1996.

• Buchanan, J. et Tullock, G. (1962). « The Calculus of Consent, Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy », 1962.

• CABRI .(2013). « Le budget-programme axé sur les performances en Afrique ». Un rapport d’état d’avancement.

• Cho, I. (2010), « The impact of korean performance budgeting on budgetary programmes » A thesis submitted toThe University of Birmingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

• Crozier, M. (1963). « Le phénomène bureaucratique, essai sur les tendances bureaucratiques des systèmes d'organisation modernes et sur leurs relations en France avec le système social et culturel ». Paris Editions Seuil, 1963, 416 p.

• Crozier, M. et Friedberg, E. (1977). « L'Acteur et le Système ». Essai sociologique. Paris Editions Seuil, 1977, 436 p.

• Curristine, T. (2005a). « Performance information in the budget process: Results of the OECD 2005 questionnaire », OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol.1 No.2, OECD.

• Curristine, T. (2005b). « Government Performance: Lessons and Challenges », OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol.5 No.1, OECD.

• Devarajan, S., et Go, D. (1998). « The Simplest Dynamic General-Equilibrium Model of an Open Economy »- Journal of Policy Modeling 20(6):677–714 (1998).

• Diagne,Y. S. 2014. « La crédibilité budgétaire au Sénégal» Direction de la Prévision et des Etudes Economiques.

• Didic, S., et Dissou, Y. (2014). « Public Investment and Economic Growth: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis with Heterogeneous Agents »- University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

• Dissou, Y. (1998). « Dynamic Effects in Senegal of the Regional Trade Agreement Among WAEMU Countries »- University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

• Dumont, J.C, et Mesplé-Somps, S. (2000). « L'impact des infrastructures publiques sur la compétitivité et la croissance : Une analyse en EGC appliquée au Sénégal, Document de travail, DIAL - Développement et insertion internationale

• Fountain, J, (2000), « GASB SEA Research Case Study: State of Oregon: a Performance System Based on Benchmarks », Government Accounting Standards.

• Giddens, A. (2007) The constitution of society, Polity Press: UK.

• Gould, J. (1968), "Adjustment Costs in the Theory of Investment of the Firm," Review of Economic Studies 35, 4-56.

• Guzmán M (2007) The Chilean experience. In Robinson M (ed.) Performance budgeting: Linking funding to results. Basingstoke : FMI/Palgrave Macmillan.

• Hardin, G. (1968). « The Tragedy of the Commons », Science, 1968.

• Jordan, M. M., et Hackbart, M. M. (1999), « Performance Budgeting and Performance Funding in the States, » Public Budgeting and Finance, Vol.19, No.1, pp. 68–88.

• Kluvers, R. (2001), « An Analysis of Introducing Program Budgeting in Local Government, » Public Budgeting & Finance, Summer, pp. 29–45.

• Kydland, F. et Prescott, E. (1977). « Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans ». Journal of Political Economy, 1977, vol. 85, issue 3, pages 473-91.

• Laffont, J.J. et Tirole, J. (1991). « The politics of government decision making : A Theory of Regulatory Capture », Quarterly Journal, 1991.

• Lienert, I (2012). « Préalables nécessaires à la conduite d’une réforme budgétaire axée sur les programmes et les performances ». Dans Élaborer un budget basé sur les résultats: Vers une budgétisation axée sur les performances. Pretoria : CABRI.

• Lucas, R.E. (1967). « Adjustment Costs and the Theory of Supply », The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 75, No. 4, Part 1. (Aug., 1967), pp. 321-334.

• Mackay K (2011) The performance framework of the Australian government, 1987 to 2011. Revue de l’OCDE sur la gestion budgétaire 11(3) : 1à 48.

• Melkers, J. E., et Willoughby, K. G. (1998), « The State of the States: Performance-Based Budgeting requirements in 47 out of 50, » Public Administration Review, 58 (1), pp. 66–73.

• Melkers, J. E., et Willoughby, K. G. (2001), « Budgeters” views of state performance-budgeting systems: Distinctions across Branches, » Public Administration Review, 61(1), pp. 54–64. • Melkers, J. E., Willoughby, K. G., Brian James, Fountain, J. et Campbell, W. (2002), « Performance Measurement at the State and Local Levels: A Summary of Survey Results », GASB,

• Melkers, J., et Mhatre, P. (2002), « Case Study: Wisconsin. Use and Effects of Using Performance Measures for Budgeting, Management and Reporting », Government Accounting Standards Board.

• Morel, C. (2002). « Les décisions absurdes », Sociologie des erreurs radicales et persistantes, Collection Bibliothèque des Sciences humaines, Gallimard, 2002.

• OECD (Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques). (2007). « La budgétisation axée sur la performance dans les pays de l’OCDE ». Paris OCDE.

• Park, N. (2006), « Performance management in the Korean public sector: current issues and future directions », Working Paper presented at the OECD Senior Budget Officials Meeting, Paris: France.

• Pigou, A. (1920). « The Economics of Welfare ». Macmillan, 1920.

• Poister, T. H., et Streib, G. (1999), « Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the Practice, » Public Administration Review, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 325–335.

• Reddick, C. G. (2003), «Testing rival theories of budgetary decision-making in the US, Financial Accountability and Management », Vol. 19 No. 4, pp 315-339.

• Robinson M. (2007). « Performance budgeting: Linking funding to results ». Basingstoke FMI/Palgrave Macmillan.

• Robinson, M., et Brumby, J. (2005), « Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Analytical Review of the Empirical Literature, IMF Working Paper, 2005. • Samuelson, P.A. (1947). « Foundations of Economic Analysis », Harvard University Press vol.2, issue 1, pages 3-21.

• Sen, A.K. (1979) « Personal Utilities and Public Judgements: Or What's Wrong with Welfare Economics ». The Economic Journal, 1979.

• Sen, A.K.(1970). « Collective Choice and Social Welfare ». Advanced Textbooks in Economics (Book 11). North Holland; n Third printing edition (January 15, 1984). 226 pages.

• Simon, Herbert. (1947). « Administrative Behavior : A Study of Decision Making Processes in Administrative Organization », New York, The Free Press, 1945 ; trad. fr., Administation et processus de décision, Paris, Économica 1983.

• Stigler, G. (1971). « The Theory of Economic Regulation ». Bell Journal of Economics, 1971.

• Tommasi D (2013) Background paper 2 : The core PFM functions and PEFA performance indicators. Washington DC: Secrétariat PEFA.

• Treadway, A.B. (1969). 'On Rational Entrepreneur Behavior and the Demand for Investment'. Review of Economic Studies, 367, 227-24.

• Tudor, D. (1970). « Planning-Programming-Budgeting Systems ». Monticello, Illinois: Council of Planning Librarians, 1970. 20 pages.

• Uzawa, H. (1969).Time Preference and the Penrose Effect in a Two-Class Model of Economic Growth, Journal of Political Economy, 77(4), 628{652.