An Optimal Quantity Tax Path in a Dynamic Setting

Nawaz, Nasreen (2017): An Optimal Quantity Tax Path in a Dynamic Setting. Published in: European Journal of Government and Economics , Vol. 2, No. 6 (31 December 2017): pp. 191-225.

Abstract

Following Ramsey, the existing literature on optimal quantity taxation only compares the pre and the post-tax market equilibriums in order to account for the efficiency losses. However, when the government imposes a quantity tax on the consumer, the buyer’s price jumps to the pre-tax equilibrium price plus the amount of the tax, and the supply and the demand of the taxed commodity then adjust over time to bring the new post-tax market equilibrium. The existing literature does not take into account the efficiency losses during the adjustment process while computing the optimal quantity taxes. This paper derives an optimal quantity tax path in a dynamic setting minimizing the efficiency losses (output and/ or consumption lost) during the dynamic adjustment process as well as the post-tax market equilibrium.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Quantity tax; Dynamic efficiency; Adjustment Path; Equilibrium
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation

References

Atkinson, A. B. and Stiglitz, J. E.: (1976), The design of tax structure: direct versus indirect taxation, Journal of public Economics 6(1), 55-75.

Chamley, C.: (1986), Optimal taxation of capital income in general equilibrium with infinite lives, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society pp. 607-622.

Chari, V. V., Christiano, L. J. and Kehoe, P. J.: (1994), Optimal fiscal policy in a business cycle model, Journal of Political Economy 102(4), 617-652.

Coleman, W. J.: (2000), Welfare and optimum dynamic taxation of consumption and income, Journal of Public Economics 76(1), 1-39.

Cremer, H. and Gahvari, F.: (1993), Tax evasion and optimal commodity taxation, Journal of Public Economics 50(2), 261-275.

Cremer, H. and Gahvari, F.: (1995), Uncertainty and optimal taxation: In defense of commodity taxes, Journal of Public Economics 56(2), 291-310.

Deaton, A.: (1981), Optimal taxes and the structure of preferences, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society pp. 1245-1260.

Deaton, A. and Stern, N.: (1986), Optimally uniform commodity taxes, taste differences and lumpsum grants, Economics Letters 20(3), 263-266.

Diamond, P. A.: (1975), A many-person Ramsey tax rule, Journal of Public Economics 4(4), 335-342.

Diamond, P. A. and Mirrlees, J. A.: (1971), Optimal taxation and public production ii: Tax rules, The American Economic Review 61(3), 261-278.

Ekins, P.: (1996), How large a carbon tax is justified by the secondary benefits of CO2 abatement?, Resource and Energy Economics 18(2), 161-187.

Judd, K. L.: (1985), Redistributive taxation in a simple perfect foresight model, Journal of Public Economics 28(1), 59-83.

Lucas, R. E. and Stokey, N. L.: (1983), Optimal fiscal and monetary policy in an economy without capital, Journal of Monetary Economics 12(1), 55-93.

Mirrless, J.: (1975), Optimal commodity taxation in a two-class economy, Journal of Public Economics 4(1), 27-33.

Naito, H.: (1999), Re-examination of uniform commodity taxes under a non-linear income tax system and its implication for production efficiency, Journal of Public Economics 71(2), 165- 188.

Nordhaus, W. D.: (1993), Rolling the ‘DICE’: an optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases, Resource and Energy Economics 15(1), 27-50.

Pizer, W. A.: (2002), Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change, Journal of public economics 85(3), 409-434.

Ramsey, F. P.: (1927), A contribution to the theory of taxation, The Economic Journal 37(145), 47-61.

Saez, E.: (2002), The desirability of commodity taxation under non-linear income taxation and heterogeneous tastes, Journal of Public Economics 83(2), 217-230.