Fuerst, Franz and Mollenkopf, John (2005): Are Local Economic Development Incentives Promoting Job Growth? An Empirical Case Study.
Download (2MB) | Preview
At a time when cities are competing with one another to attract or retain jobs within a globalizing economy, city governments are providing an array of financial incentives to stimulate job growth and retain existing jobs, particularly in high cost locations. This paper provides the first systematic and comprehensive analysis of datasets on economic development incentives in New York City over the last fifteen years. The evidence on job retention and creation is mixed. Although many companies do not meet their agreed-upon job targets in absolute terms, the evidence suggests that companies receiving subsidies outperform their respective industries in terms of employment growth, that is, the grow more, or decline less. We emphasize that this finding is difficult to interpret, since firms receiving incentives may not be representative of the industry as a whole. In other words, their above-average performance may simply reflect the fact that the Economic Development Corporation (EDC) selects economically promising companies within manufacturing (or other industries) when granting incentives. At the same time, it is also possible that receiving incentives helps these companies to become stronger.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Are Local Economic Development Incentives Promoting Job Growth? An Empirical Case Study|
|Keywords:||economic development incentives; job growth; manufacturing; subsidies; urban development; economic development policy|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy
H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R51 - Finance in Urban and Rural Economies
|Depositing User:||Franz Fuerst|
|Date Deposited:||08. Nov 2008 04:42|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 15:29|
Bartik, T. 1991. The effects of property taxes and other local public policy on the intrametropolitan pattern of business location. In: Herzog, H., Schlottman, A. (Eds.): Industry Location and Public Policy, University of Tennessee Press,Knoxville, TN.
Bartik, T. 1994. Jobs, Productivity, and Local Economic Development: What Implications Does Economic Research Have For the Role of Government?" National Tax Journal 47(4):847-862.
Bowles, J. 2001. The City's Tax Break Policy is a Waste. In: Newsday, February 26, 34. Center for an Urban Future. 2001. Payoffs for layoffs: Designed to save Jobs, New York City's Corporate Retention Deals often Result in Job Cuts.
Dunn Jr., E.S. 1960. A statistical and analytical technique for regional analysis. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association 6:97-112.
Economic Development Corporation of New York City [EDC] 2004. Available Incentives Programs for Businesses. Available under www.nyc.gov/edc
Fainstein, S. Stokes, R. 1998. Spaces for Play: The Impacts of Entertainment Development on New York City. Economic Development Quarterly, 12:1, 150- 165.
Fox, W.; Murray, M. 1998. Incentives, firm location decisions and regional economic performance. In: Ladd, H. (ed.): Local government tax on land use Local Economic Development Incentives Page 31 policies in the United States. Northampton, MA: Edward
Elgar, 168-181. Gabe, T. M., Kraybill D.S. 2002. The Effect of State Economic Development Incentives on Employment Growth of Establishments. Journal of Regional Science, 42, 703-730.
Glaeser, E. L. 1999. Help poor people, not poor places. The Wall Street Journal, August 12, 1999: A22.
Goss, E.; Phillips, J. 1999. Do Business Tax Incentives Contribute to a Divergence in Economic Growth? Economic Development Quarterly 13:3, 217-228.
Good Jobs New York. 2004. Know when to fold 'em Btime to walk away from NYC's "corporate retention" game.
Kelly, T., Henderson, J. W., Seaman S. L. 1997. The Efficiency of Tax Abatement in the Market for Jobs. Journal of Economics, 23:2.
Ladd, H. 1998. Local government tax on land use policies in the United States. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Leroy, G. 1995. No more candy store: states move to end corporate welfare as we know it. Dollar & Sense, May/June 1995.
IBO, New York Independent Budget Office (2001): Full disclosure? Assessing city reporting on business retention deals, Policy Brief, June.
Rubin, M. 1990. Urban enterprise zones: Do they work? Evidence from New Jersey. Public Budgeting and Finance 10/4, 3-17.
Tannenwald, R. 1996. State business tax climate: How should it be measured and how important is it? New England Economic Review 1, 23-28.
Vogel, R.M. 2000. Relocation subsidies: Regional growth or corporate welfare? Review of Radical Political Economics, 32/3, 437-447.
Weber, R. 2004. Negotiating the ideal deal. (Paper presented at the Competing for Capital Conference, University of Minnesota, February 13).
The City of New York, Department of Finance, Office of Tax Policy. 2003. Annual Report on Tax Expenditures, Fiscal Year 2003. US Census Bureau 2004. County Business Patterns. Washington D.C.
New York State Department of Labor 2004. Covered Employment & Wages, ES- 202 Program. New York Division.