Logo
Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Counterfactual Reconciliation: Incorporating Aggregation Constraints For More Accurate Causal Effect Estimates

Cengiz, Doruk and Tekgüç, Hasan (2022): Counterfactual Reconciliation: Incorporating Aggregation Constraints For More Accurate Causal Effect Estimates.

[thumbnail of MPRA_paper_114478.pdf]
Preview
PDF
MPRA_paper_114478.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

We extend the scope of the forecast reconciliation literature and use its tools in the context of causal inference. Researchers are interested in both the average treatment effect on the treated and treatment effect heterogeneity. We show that ex post correction of the counterfactual estimates using the aggregation constraints that stem from the hierarchical or grouped structure of the data is likely to yield more accurate estimates. Building on the geometric interpretation of forecast reconciliation, we provide additional insights into the exact factors determining the size of the accuracy improvement due to the reconciliation. We experiment with U.S. GDP and employment data. We find that the reconciled treatment effect estimates tend to be closer to the truth than the original (base) counterfactual estimates even in cases where the aggregation constraints are non-linear. Consistent with our theoretical expectations, improvement is greater when machine learning methods are used.

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact us: mpra@ub.uni-muenchen.de

This repository has been built using EPrints software.

MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by Logo of the University Library LMU Munich.