Grassi, Stefano and Proietti, Tommaso (2008): Has the Volatility of U.S. Inflation Changed and How?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_11453.pdf Download (583kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The local level model with stochastic volatility, recently proposed for U.S. by Stock and Watson (Why Has U.S. Inflation Become Harder to Forecast?, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Supplement to Vol. 39, No. 1, February 2007), provides a simple yet sufficently rich framework for characterizing the evolution of the main stylized facts concerning the U.S. inflation. The model decomposes inflation into a core component, evolving as a random walk, and a transitory component. The volatility of the disturbances driving both components is allowed to vary over time. The paper provides a full Bayesian analysis of this model and readdresses some of the main issues that were raised by the literature concerning the evolution of persistence and predictability and the extent and timing of the great moderation. The assessment of various nested models of inflation volatility and systematic model selection provide strong evidence in favor of a model with heteroscedastic disturbances in the core component, whereas the transitory component has time invariant size. The main evidence is that the great moderation is over, and that volatility, persistence and predictability of inflation underwent a turning point in the late 1990s. During the last decade volatility and persistence have been increasing and predictability has been going down.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Has the Volatility of U.S. Inflation Changed and How? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Marginal Likelihood; Bayesian Model Comparison; Stochastic Volatility; Great Moderation; Inflation Persistence |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E31 - Price Level ; Inflation ; Deflation C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes |
Item ID: | 11453 |
Depositing User: | Tommaso Proietti |
Date Deposited: | 07 Nov 2008 23:11 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 23:18 |
References: | Bos, C. S., and Shephard, N. (2006). Inference for Adaptive Time Series Models: Stochastic Volatility and Conditionally Guassian State Space Form, Econometric Reviews, 25, 219–244. Bos, C. S., Koopman, S.J. and Ooms, M. (2008). Long Memory Modelling of Inflation with Stochastic Variance and Structural Breaks, Discussion paper TI 07–099/4, Tinbergen Institute. Brot, C. and Ruiz, E., (2008) Testing for conditional heteroskedastic in the components of inflation, Banco de Espana, WP n. 0812. Doornik, J.A (2007). Ox: An Object-Oriented Matrix Programming Language, Timberlake Consultants Press, London. Cappé, O., Moulines, E. and Ryden, T. (2007). Inference in Hidden Markow Models, Springer Cecchetti, G., Hooper, P., Kasman, B.C., Shoenholtz, K. and Watson, M. (2007). Understanding the evolving Inflation Process, U.S. Monetary Policy Forum. Chib, S. (1995). Marginal Likelihood from the Gibbs Output, Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 90, 1313–1321. Chib, S. and Jeliazkov, I. (2001). Marginal Likelihood from the Metropolis-Hastings Output, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 270–281. Cogley, T., Primicieri, G. and Sargent, T.J. (2008). Inflation-Gap persistence in the U.S., NBER Working Paper No. 13749. Durbin, J. and Koopman, S.J. (2002). A simple and efficient simulation smoother for state space time series analysis, Biometrika, 89, 603-616 Geweke, J.F. (2005). Contemporary Bayesian econometrics and statistics, Wiley, New York. Kim, S., Shepard, N. and Chib, S. (1998). Stochastic Volatility: Likelihood Inference and Comparison with ARCH model. Review of Economic Studies, 65, 361-393. Liu, J. S. (2001). Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing. Springer. Pivetta, F. and R. Reis (2007). The persistence of inflation in the United States, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, 1326–1358 Stock, J.H., and Watson, M. (2007). Why Has U.S. Inflation Become Harder to Forecast?, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39, 3–34. West, M. and Harrison, J. (1997). Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models (2 ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/11453 |