Personal income distribution and the endogeneity of the demand regime

Tonni, Lorenzo (2021): Personal income distribution and the endogeneity of the demand regime.

Abstract

This paper deals with two intrinsically linked issues: the endogeneity of the demand regime and the personal distribution impact on aggregate demand. By microfounding the savings function, the aggregate savings rate is an increasing function of the Gini index, which in turn is decomposed as a function of the functional income distribution and the Gini indices for wages and profits. By assuming that saving is a function of personal rather than functional income distribution, an increase of the labour share is effective in boosting consumption and aggregate demand, not per se, but only as long as it reduces personal inequality. As the labour share increases, depending on the distribution of wages and profits, both the demand regime type – the sign of the slope of the demand schedule - and its strength- the size of the slope of the demand schedule - can endogenously change. Concerning the former, there can be a threshold value for the wage share beyond which there is a shift from wage-led to profit-led demand. The analysis shows that, unlike most Kaleckian models, profit inequality is just as important as wage inequality in determining the demand regime type and its strength.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Personal distribution, functional distribution, wage-led, profit-led, non-linear demand, endogenous demand regime
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B50 - General; D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions; D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D33 - Factor Income Distribution; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E11 - Marxian ; Sraffian ; Kaleckian; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian

References

Edward Amadeo. Expectations in a steady state model of capacity utilization. Technical report, Texto para discussao, 1987.

Amit Bhaduri and Stephen Marglin. Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies. Cambridge journal of Economics, 14(4):375-393, 1990.

Laura Carvalho and Armon Rezai. Personal income inequality and aggregate demand. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(2):491-505, 2016.

James Stemble Duesenberry et al. Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior. 1949.

Amitava Krishna Dutt. Stagnation, income distribution and monopoly power. Cambridge journal of Economics, 8(1):25-40, 1984.

Karen E Dynan, Jonathan Skinner, and Stephen P Zeldes. Do the rich save more? Journal of political economy, 112(2):397-444, 2004.

Stefan Ederer and Miriam Rehm. Wealth inequality and aggregate demand. Metroeconomica, 2019.

Eckhard Hein and Franz J Prante. Functional distribution and wage inequality in recent kaleckian growth models. Economic Growth and Macroeconomic Stabilization Policies in Post-Keynesian Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.

Jakob Kapeller, Michael A Landesmann, Franz X Mohr, and Bernhard Schütz. Government policies and financial crises: mitigation, postponement or prevention? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(2):309-330, 2018.

Jakob Kapeller and Bernhard Schütz. Conspicuous consumption, inequality and debt: the nature of consumption-driven profit-led regimes. Metroeconomica, 66(1):51-70, 2015.

Marc Lavoie. Unproductive outlays and capital accumulation with target-return pricing. Review of Social Economy, 54(3):303-322, 1996.

Robert I Lerman and Shlomo Yitzhaki. Income inequality effects by income source: A new approach and applications to the united states. The review of economics and statistics, pages 151-156, 1985.

Adam Seth Levine, Robert H Frank, and Oege Dijk. Expenditure cascades. Available at SSRN 1690612, 2010.

Michalis Nikiforos. Distribution-led growth in the long run. Review of Keynesian Economics, 4(4):391-408, 2016.

Thomas I Palley. A neo-kaleckian-goodwin model of capitalist economic growth: monopoly power, managerial pay and labour market conflict. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(6):1355-1372, 2014.

Thomas I Palley. The middle class in macroeconomics and growth theory: a three-class neo-kaleckian-goodwin model. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(1):221-243, 2015.

Thomas I Palley. Inequality and growth in neo-kaleckian and cambridge growth theory. Review of Keynesian Economics, 5(2):146-169, 2017a.

Thomas I Palley. Wage-vs. profit-led growth: the role of the distribution of wages in determining regime character. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(1):49-61, 2017b.

Thomas I Palley et al. Enriching the neo-kaleckian growth model: Nonlinearities, political economy, and financial factors. Technical report, 2013.

B. Rowthorn. Demand, Real Wages and Economic Growth. Thames papers in political economy. Thames Polytechnics, 1981.

Mark Setterfield and Yun K Kim. Debt servicing, aggregate consumption, and growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 36:22-33, 2016.

Daniele Tavani and Ramaa Vasudevan. Capitalists, workers, and managers: Wage inequality and effective demand. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 30:120-131, 2014.

Lance Taylor. Real and money wages, output and inflation in the semi-industrialized world. Economica, pages 329-353, 1990.

A. Trezzini. The economics of consumption as a social phenomenon: a neglected approach to the analysis of consumption. Aracne, 2005.

T. Veblen and C.W. Mills. The Theory of the Leisure Class. Reprints of Economic Classics Series. Macmillan, 1899.