Kumar, G. K. Chetan and Rangappa, K. B. and Suchitra, S. (2022): Effectiveness of online capacity building programs in wholistic development of faculties: an empirical analysis. Published in: Asian Association of Open Universities Journal , Vol. 17, No. 2 (27 September 2022): pp. 194-211.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_114832.pdf Download (618kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Purpose – Faculties have a vital role to play in ensuring that their graduates are trained with relevant skills. Formally arranged capacity building programs (CBPs) can aid in training and retraining the faculties with relevant contemporary skills so that they in turn can do justice to their students. The purpose of this study is to analyze the efficacy of such public-funded online CBPs in enhancing faculties’ research and teaching capabilities. Design/methodology/approach – Ascientifically designed questionnaire was sent to faculties who attended 12-day public-funded online capacity building workshop. Binomial logistic regression models were constructed to analyze as to how effective the online workshop was in enhancing teaching and research skills of the faculties involved. Findings – From the research study, the authors were able to infer that although faculties were able to understand theoretical concepts of qualitative nature relatively easily, the authors felt that its value addition in enhancing the research output was rather limited. The study also found that the faculties felt teaching concepts outside their “syllabus” to be counterintuitive. A significant finding of the study was that research had an important role in enhancing their teaching efficacy. Originality/value – Studies which are undertaken to test the efficacy of online capacity building workshops are scarce. This domain is going to gain importance in near future as technology is evolving at a rapid rate and online training of faculties helps in optimizing scarce resources.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Effectiveness of online capacity building programs in wholistic development of faculties: an empirical analysis |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | faculty development program; contemporary skills; public funded programs; career orientation; research skills; online training |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions |
Item ID: | 114832 |
Depositing User: | G K Chetan Kumar |
Date Deposited: | 13 Oct 2022 10:02 |
Last Modified: | 19 Oct 2022 11:17 |
References: | Aithal, P.S. and Aithal, S. (2020), “Analysis of the Indian national education Policy 2020 towards achieving its objectives”, International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 19-41. Ari, E. (2016), “Using multinomial logistic regression to examine the relationship between children’s work status and demographic characteristics”, Research Journal of Politics, Economics and Management, Vol. 4, pp. 77-93. Begum, J., Kousar and Ahmed, A. (2015), “The importance of statistical tools in research work”, International Journal of Scientific and Innovative Mathematical Research (IJSIMR), Vol. 3 No. 12, pp. 50-58, December 2015. Bisaria, G. (2011), “Impact of industry-academia interface on development of management colleges”, RMS Journal of Management and IT, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 3-13. Bousbahi, F. and Alrazgan, M.S. (2015), “Investigating IT faculty resistance to learning management system adoption using latent variables in an acceptance technology model”, The Scientific World Journal, 2015, IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education, Vol. 8 Nos 2, pp. 1-11, -2020 102, doi: 10.1155/2015/375651. Buchanan, E.A. (1999), “Assessment measures: pretest for successful distance teaching and learning”, Journal of Distance Learning Administration [Electronic], Vol. 2 No. 4, available at: http://www. westga.edu/∼distance/buchanan24.htm (accessed 23 July 2021). Chappell, A.L. (2000), “Emergence of participatory methodology in learning difficulty research: understanding the context”, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 38-43, doi: 10.1046/j.1468-3156.2000.00004.x. Chetan Kumar, G.K., Rangappa, K.B. and Suchitra, S. (2021), “Effectiveness of seminar and webinar in learning experience: an empirical analysis”, Education India, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 247-257, 21 May 0002. Fuglestad, A.B. (2009), “ICT for inquiry in mathematics: a developmental research Approach”, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 191-202, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/138143. GoI (2020), “National education policy (2020)”, Ministry of Human Resource and Development, available at: https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf. Gulbahar, Y. and Guven, I. (2008), “A survey on ict usage and the perceptions of social studies teachers in Turkey”, Educational Technology and Society, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 37-51, available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.11.3.37.pdf. Harris, A.L. and Rea, A. (2019), “Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies: a growing impact on IS education”, Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 20 No. 2, available at: https://aisel. aisnet.org/jise/vol20/iss2/3. Kumar, B.A., Goundar, M.S. and Chand, S.S. (2020), “A framework for heuristic evaluation of mobile learning applications”, Education and Information Technologies. doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10112-8. Leicht, A., Heiss, J. and Byun, W.J. (2018), Issues and Trends in Education for Sustainable Development, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, place de Fontenoy, Paris, 07 SP © UNESCO 2018, Vol. 7, ISBN 978-92-3-100244-1. Malik, D. (2021), “National education policy 2020 and its comparative analysis with RTE. American research”, Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 7, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.21694/2378-7031. 21003, accessed 20 January 2022. Misra, S. (2012), “Importance of statistics in social sciences & research”, National Seminar on Recent Trends in Official Statistics At: Department of Statistics Lucknow University Lucknow, Vol. 1. Mulford, B. (2003), “School leaders: challenging roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness”, OECD Commissioned Paper. Nadaf, Dr-Zaffar (2017), “Perception of students on tablet and laptop distribution scheme of U.P.government”, Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies. doi: 10.7358/ecps-2017- 015-nada. Peters, O. (2000), “The flexible and virtual university: pedagogical models. open and distance learning in the new millennium”, IGNOU, New Delhi. Selwyn, N. (2016), Is Technology Good for Education, Wiley, Cambridge, 978-0-745-69646-1. Tuffrey-Wijne, I., Lam, C.K.K., Marsden, D., Conway, B., Harris, C., Jeffrey, D., Jordan, L., Keagan-Bull, R., McDermott, M., Newton, D. and Stapelberg, D. (2020), “Developing a training course to teach research skills to people with learning disabilities: “It gives us a voice. We CAN be researchers”, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 301-314. Yekin, N.A., Adigun, J.O., Ojo, O. and Andakinwole, A.K. (2020), “Assessment of Adoption of E-Learning and MLearning During COVID-19 Lockdown in Nigeria”, International Academic Journal of Education and Literature, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 28-34. Zucca-Scott, L. (2010), “Know thyself: the importance of humanism in education”, International Education, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 32-38. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/114832 |