Batabyal, Amitrajeet (2022): Tanneries in Kanpur and pollution in the Ganges: a theoretical analysis.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_115032.pdf Download (190kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We study pollution in the Ganges river caused by tanneries in the city of Kanpur in India. Two tanneries, A and B, are located on the same bank of the Ganges in Kanpur. Both produce leather and the production of leather requires the use of chemicals that are toxic to humans. Tannery A is located upstream from tannery B. Tannery A's leather production depends directly only on labor use but tannery B's leather production depends on labor use, the chemical waste generated by tannery A, and the natural pollution absorbing capacity of the Ganges. In this setting, we accomplish three tasks. First, we determine the equilibrium production of leather by both tanneries in the benchmark case in which there is no pollution. Second, we ascertain how the benchmark equilibrium is altered when tannery B accounts for the negative externality imposed on it by tannery A. Finally, we analyze what happens to leather production and to labor use when the two tanneries merge and then we discuss some policy implications emanating from our research.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Tanneries in Kanpur and pollution in the Ganges: a theoretical analysis |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Ganges river; leather; merger; pollution; tannery |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs ; Distributional Effects ; Employment Effects Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling |
Item ID: | 115032 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Amitrajeet Batabyal |
Date Deposited: | 17 Oct 2022 23:00 |
Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2022 05:37 |
References: | Anonymous. 2019. 91 Kanpur tanneries ‘polluting’ Ganga closed, Business Standard, January 8. https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/91-kanpur-tanneries-polluting-ganga-closed-119010800177_1.html. Accessed on 24 August 2022. Ansari, A., Singh, I., and Tobschall, H. 2000. Importance of geomorphology and sedimentation processes for metal dispersion in sediments and solis of the Ganga plain: Identification of geochemical domains, Chemical Geology, 162, 245-266. Batabyal, A.A., and Beladi, H. 2017. Cleaning the Ganges in Varanasi to attract tourists, Atlantic Economic Journal, 45, 511-513. Batabyal, A.A., and Beladi, H. 2019. Probabilistic approaches to cleaning the Ganges in Varanasi to attract tourists, Natural Resource Modeling, 32, e12177, 1-11. Batabyal, A.A., and Beladi, H. 2020. A political economy model of the Ganges pollution cleanup problem, Natural Resource Modeling, 33, e12285, 1-12. Bhatnagar, M.K., Singh, R., Gupta, S., Bhatnagar, P. 2013. Study of tannery effluents and its effects on sediments of river Ganga in special reference to heavy metals at Jajmau, Kanpur, India, Journal of Environmental Research and Development, 8, 56-59. Black, G. 2016. Purifying the goddess, The New Yorker, 92, 46-53. Chakraborty, P., and Chakraborty, D. 2007. Environmental regulations and Indian leather industry, Economic and Political Weekly, 42, 1669-1671. Chitnis, P. 2017. Why Kanpur’s tanneries are at the center of a fight to save the Ganga, Bloomberg Quint, December 5. https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/why-kanpurs-tanneries-are-at-the-centre-of-a-fight-to-save-the-ganga. Accessed on 24 August 2022. Conaway, C. 2015. The river of death, Newsweek Global, 165, 56-65. Dhillon, A. 2014. Ganga management, Post Magazine, South China Morning Post, September 14. http://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/article/1589301/ganga-management. Accessed on 24 August 2022. Gallagher, S. 2014. India: The toxic price of leather, Pulitzer Center, February 4. https://pulitzercenter.org/reporting/india-toxic-price-leather-0. Accessed on 24 August 2022. Gettleman, J., Schultz, K., Venkataraman, A., and Yasir, S. 2019. India election gives Modi a 2nd term. Here are 5 takeaways, New York Times, May 23. Gowd, S.S., Reddy, M.R., and Govil, P.K. 2010. Assessment of heavy metal contamination in soils at Jajmau (Kanpur) and Unnao industrial areas of the Ganga plain, Uttar Pradesh, India, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 174, 113-121. Hammer, J. 2007. A prayer for the Ganges, Smithsonian Magazine, 38, 74-82. Hartwick, J.M., and Olewiler, N.D. 1998. The Economics of Natural Resource Use, 2nd edition. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA. Katiyar, S. 2011. Impact of tannery effluent with special reference to seasonal variation on physico-chemical characteristics of river water at Kanpur (U.P), India, Journal of Environmental and Analytical Toxicology, 1, 1-7. Khwaja, A.R., Singh, R., and Tandon, S.N. 2001. Monitoring of Ganga water and sediments vis-à-vis tannery pollution at Kanpur (India): A case study, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 68, 19-35. Mallet, V. 2017. River of Life, River of Death. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Markandya, A., and Murty, M.N. 2004. Cost-benefit analysis of cleaning the Ganges: Some emerging environment and development issues, Environment and Development Economics, 9, 61-81. Menon, U. 1988. Technology and development aid: The case of Ganga action plan, Economic and Political Weekly, 23, 1693-1701. Sankar, U. 2004. Pollution control in tanneries, in G.K. Kadekodi, (Ed.), Environmental Economics in Practice, 49-85. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India. Singh, A., and Gundimeda, H. 2020. Why regulations come up short? Some observations from a field study of the Kanpur leather industry, Ecology, Economy and Society---the INSEE Journal, 3, 185-190. Singh, P. 2006. Bridging the Ganga action plan: Monitoring failure at Kanpur, Economic and Political Weekly, 41, 590-592. Singh, A., and Gundimeda, H. 2021. 2021. Measuring technical efficiency and shadow price of water pollutants for the leather industry in India: A directional distance function approach, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 59, 71-93. Sinha, S., Gupta, A., Bhatt, K., Pandey, K., Rai, U., and Singh, K. 2006. Distribution of metals in the edible plants grown at Jajmau, Kanpur (India) receiving treated tannery wastewater: Relation with physico-chemical properties of the soil, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 115, 1-22. Slater, J., and Masih, N. 2019. India’s Modi wins resounding election victory with potent appeal to nationalism, Washington Post, May 23. Srivastava, V.K. 2010. Indian rivers pollution---critical analysis: Ganga action plan, Indian Chemical Engineer, 52, 155-156. Tare, V., Bose, P., and Gupta, S.K. 2003. Suggestions for a modified approach towards implementation and assessment of Ganga action plan and other similar river action plans in India, Water Quality Research Journal, 38, 607-626. Xing, S., and Batabyal, A.A. 2019. A safe minimum standard, an elasticity of substitution, and the cleanup of the Ganges in Varanasi, Natural Resource Modeling, 32, e12223, 1-11. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/115032 |