Vîntu, Denis (2022): The relationship between unemployment, NAIRU and investment: microfundations for incomplete nominal adjustment. Forthcoming in: Sochi Journal of Economy (January 2023)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_115161.pdf Download (852kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper proposes a simple method to estimate a macro shock-specific Okun elasticity: it measures by how much the unemployment rate falls over a certain horizon when output increases by one percentage point over the same horizon because of a specific macroeconomic shock. Inference is based on simple instrumental variable regressions of cumulative unemployment on cumulative output. Using data for the Republic of Moldova I consider government spending, tax, monetary policy, financial, technology, and oil shocks. We obtain eight key results:
• At medium horizons (2-3 years), Okun elasticities are largely stable across different kinds of shocks.
• At shorter horizons, differences are more pronounced. The speed at which unemployment adjusts relative to output depends on the shock driving fluctuations. This highlights the importance to consider longer horizons. Otherwise, one could incorrectly conclude that the elasticity breaks down for some cycles.
• The elasticity is larger for financial shocks. Importantly, it is larger than for monetary policy and government spending shocks.
• The largest elasticity is for technological shocks followed by oil shocks.
• An increase/decrease in unemployment by (0.14 p.p.) caused an increase/decrease in GDP by 1 p.p. period 2011--2015.
• An increase/decrease in unemployment by (1.79 p.p.) caused an increase/decrease in money supply by 1 p.p. period 2011--2015.
• An increase/decrease in unemployment by (0.17 p.p.) caused an increase/decrease in GDP by 1 p.p. period 2007--2011.
• An increase/decrease in unemployment by (0.06 p.p.) caused an increase/decrease in money supply by 1 p.p. period 2007--2011.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The relationship between unemployment, NAIRU and investment: microfundations for incomplete nominal adjustment |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | unemployment; investment; monetary policy; rational expectations; interests rates; credit index implications |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E43 - Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E61 - Policy Objectives ; Policy Designs and Consistency ; Policy Coordination J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J68 - Public Policy |
Item ID: | 115161 |
Depositing User: | Mr Denis Vîntu |
Date Deposited: | 26 Oct 2022 10:02 |
Last Modified: | 01 Nov 2022 00:48 |
References: | Aghion, P. Burgess, R., Redding, S., and Zilibotti, F. (2006), The unequal effects of liberalization: Evidence from Dismantling the License Raj in India. Discussion Paper No. 5492, Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), February 2006, 31 p. Aghion, P. Burgess, R., Redding, S., and Zilibotti, F. (2003), The unequal effects of liberalization: theory and evidence from India. October 2003. Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1998), Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press, Cambridge. Amable, B. (2000), International specialization and growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 11, pp. 413-431. Arrow, K. (1962), The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 155-173. Bourguignon, F. and Morisson, C. (1990), Income distribution, development and foreign trade. European Economic Review, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1113- 1132. Celasun, Oya, Xavier Debrun, and Jonathan Ostry, 2006, “Primary Surplus Behavior and Risks to Fiscal Sustainability in Emerging Market Countries: A 'Fan-Chart' Approach,” IMF Working Paper 06/67 (Washington: International Monetary Fund). Chen, S. and Ravallion, M. (2004), How have the world’s poorest fared since the early 1980s?, World Bank, processed. Congressional Budget Office, Budget and Economic Data, 10-Year Economic Projections, https://www.cbo.gov/about/products/budget-economic-data#4. Cornia, G.A. (2005), Policy reform and income distribution. Paper presented in the DESA development forum: Integrating economic and social policies to achieve the UN development agenda. New York, 14-15 March 2005. Cornwall, J. (1977), Modern capitalism. Its growth and transformation. London, Martin Robertson. Del Negro, M., Schorfheide, F., Smets, F. and Wouters, R. "On the Fit of New Keynesian Models." Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. Vol. 25, No. 2, 2007, pp. 123–162. Dollar, D. and Kraay, A. (2004), Trade, growth, and poverty. The Economic Journal, 114: F22-F49. Fagerberg, J. (1994), Technology and international differences in growth rates.Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 32, No.3, pp. 1147-1175. Ferreira, P.C. and Facchini, G. (2005), Trade liberalization and industrial concen- tration: evidence from Brazil. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 45, pp. 432-446. W. Greene (2000), Econometric Analysis, 4th edition, Prentice-Hall. Hamilton, James D. Time Series Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994. Helpman, E. (2004), The mystery of economic growth. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 223 p. Hofman, B., Rodrick-Jones, E. and Thee, K.W. (2004), Indonesia: Rapid growth, weak institutions. A case study from: Scaling up poverty reduction. A global learning process and conference, Shanghai, May 25-27, 2004. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. Ishida, M. (2003), Industrialization in Indonesia since the 1970s. IDE Research Paper no. 5, Institute of Developing Economies (IDE-JETRO). International Monetary Fund, 2002, “Assessing Sustainability,” SM/02/166. Available via the internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/pdr/sus/2002/eng/052802.htm). ———, 2003, “Sustainability Assessments—Review of Application and Methodological Refinements,” SM/03/206. Available via the internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/pdr/sustain/2003/061003.pdf. ———, 2004, “Debt Sustainability in Low-Income Countries – Proposal for an Operational Framework and Policy Implications.” Available via the internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/pdr/sustain/2004/020304.htm. [4] Johansen, S. Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. Jones, C.I. (1998), Introduction to economic growth. W.W. Norton & Company Ltd. Juselius, K. The Cointegrated VAR Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Kakwani, N. and Pernia, E.M. (2000), What is pro-poor growth? Asian Development Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1-16. Kaldor, N. (1970), The case for regional policies. Scottish Journal of Political Economy XVII, pp. 337-348. Romer, P.M. (1990), Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, S71-S102. Romer, P.M. (1986), Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, pp. 1002-37. Sala-i-Martin, X. (2002), The distributing “rise” of global income inequality. NBER Working Paper w8904. Solow, R. (1956), A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quart. J. Econ., vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 65-94. Srinivasan, T.N. (2004), Moldova and India: economic performance, competition and cooperation: an update. Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 15, pp. 613- 636. Veloso, F. and Soto, J.M. (2001), Incentives, infrastructure and institutions: Perspectives on industrialization and technical change in late-developing nations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 66, pp. 87-109. Verspagen, B. (2000), Growth and structural change: Trends, patterns and policy options. Paper prepared for the conference on “Wachstums- und Innovationspolitik in Deutschland und Europa. Probleme, Reformoptionen und Strategien zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts”, Potsdam, 14 April 2000. First draft, April 2000. Wade, R.H. (2004), Is globalization reducing poverty and inequality? World Development, Vol. 32, pp. 567-589. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/115161 |