Экономика природо- и землепользования в контексте карбоновой повестки

Tolstoguzov, Oleg and Belykh, Anastasia (2021): Экономика природо- и землепользования в контексте карбоновой повестки. Published in: Экономика северо-запада: проблемы и перспективы развития No. 4 (67) (2021): pp. 73-84.

Abstract

Исследование посвящено созданию аналитического инструментария в рамках формирования мониторинга в целях получения ответов на карбоновый вызов и достижения глубины понимания фундаментальных противоречий структуры социально-природных отношений. Мониторинг необходим для подсчета углеродного баланса и формирования своевременных легитимных финансовых и институциональных решений. Для учета финансового результата и полезности в условиях равновесия отрасли с высокой природоемкостью используется модель монополистической конкуренции Диксита - Стиглица с применением ставки социального дисконтирования, учитывающей особенности территорий.

This research focuses on the creation of an analytical toolkit as part of monitoring formation to answer the Carboniferous challenge and achieve a deeper understanding of fundamental contradictions in the structure of socio-natural relations. This monitoring is necessary to calculate the carbon balance and to formulate timely legitimate financial and institutional decisions. The Dixit-Stiglitz monopolistic competition model, using an area-specific social discount rate, is used to account for financial performance and utility in an equilibrium high nature-intensive industry.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Economics of nature and land use in the context of the carbon agenda
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: карбоновая повестка дня; природные и социальные геосистемы; полезность; социальное дисконтирование; социальный бренд
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P28 - Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment

References

UNEP. Decoupling Natural Resource use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth. URL: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/decoupling-natural-resource-use-and-environmental-impacts-economic-growth(accessed: 9-Oct-2020).

Quillérou E., Thomas R. Costs of land degradation and benefits of land restoration: a review of valuation methods and suggested frameworks for inclusion into policy-making // CAB Review. - 2012. – no. 7(060). - pp. 1-12.

Conrad E., Cassar L.F. Decoupling Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation: Reviewing Progress to Date in the Small Island State of Malta // Sustainability. -2014. - no. 6. – pp. 6729-6750.

Recommendations of the Conference of European statisticians for measuring sustainable development. - United Nations. New York and Geneva: Organization for economic cooperation and development and the statistical service of the European Union – Eurostat, 2014.

Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth. - OECD. URL: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/ ?cote=sg/sd(2002)1/final&doclanguage=en (Accessed: 2-Sept-2020).

Stiglitz J., Sen A., Fitoussi J.P. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.2009. URL: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/258260767_Report_of_the_Commission_on_the_Measurement_of_Economic_Performance_and_Social_Progress_CMEPSP (accessed: 9-Oct-2020).

UNEP. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. - Washington DC: Island Press, 2005.

The System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012. Central Framework. - The United Nations, the European Commission, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank Group, 2014.

Nkonya E. et al.Global cost of land degradation in Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement // Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement – A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development / Ed. by E. Nkonya et al. - Cham: Springer, 2016. - pp. 117–165.doi: 10. 1007/978–3–319–19168–3_6.

Nkonya E. et al.Concepts and Methods of Global Assessment of the Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement // Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement – A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development / Ed. by E. Nkonya et al. - Cham: Springer, 2016. - pp.15-32.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19168-3.

von Braun J., Gerber N., Mirzabaev A., Nkonya E. The Economics of Land Degradation // ZEF Working Paper. – 2013. - no. 109/ - 35р. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2237977.

Сочава Б. В. Введение в учение о геосистемах. - Новосибирск: Наука, 1978. - 319 с.

Кирдина С. Г. Методологический институционализм как новый принцип анализа сложных социальных систем на мезоуровне // TERRAECONOMICUS. - 2016. - Т. 14. - № 1. - С. 98–108.

Кирдина-Чэндлер С. Г., Маевский В. И. Эволюция гетеродоксальной мезоэкономики // TERRA ECONOMICUS. - 2020. - Т. 18. - № 3. - С. 30–52.

Шаститко А. Е. Мезоинституты: умножение сущностей или развитие программы экономических исследований? // Вопросы экономики. - 2019. - № 5. - С. 5–25.

Dopfer K.., Foster J., Potts J. Micro–meso–macro // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. - 2004. - Vol. 14(3). - pp. 263–279. DOI: 10.1007/s00191-004-0193-0.

Dopfer K. Mesoeconomics: A Unified Approach to Systems Complexity and Evolution // Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, no 13391 / ed. C. Antonelli. - Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011. URL: http://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/elgeebook/13391.htm (дата обращения: 12.05.2021).

Dopfer K. The origins of meso economics. Schumpeter’s legacy and beyond // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. - 2012. - №22(1). - Р. 133–160. doi: 10.1007/s00191-011-0218-4/.

Elsner W. The Process and a Simple Logic of ‘Meso’. Emergence and the Coevolution of Institutions and Group Size // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. - 2010. - Vol. 20 (3). - P. 445–477.

Menard C. Embedding organizational arrangements: towards a general model // Journal of Institutional Economics. - 2014. - №10(4). - Р. 567–589. doi: 10.1017/ S1744137414000228.

Hassink R., Isaksen A., Trippl M. Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development // Regional Studies. - 2019. – no.11. - Р. 1636-1645. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704

Isaksen A., Trippl M. Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes // Economic Geography. - 2017. – no.93(5). - Р. 436–457

Dixit A., Stiglitz J. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity // American Economic Review. 1977. 297-308.

Krugman P. Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade // Journal of International Economics. -1979. – no.9 (4). – pp.469–479.

Krugman P.R. Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade // American Economic Review. – 1980. –no.70 (5). - Pp.950–959.

Allen T., Giampietro M. Holons, creaons, genons, environs, in hierarchy theory: Where we have gone // Ecological Modeling. – 2014. - Vol.293. – pp. 31-41. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.06.017

Alcamo J. et al. 2003. Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment / Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. - Washington. Covelo. London: Island Press, 2003.- xiii, 266 p.

Эндрес А., Квернер И. Экономика природных ресурсов. - СПб.: Питер, 2004. - 256 с.

Holling C.S. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems // Annual Review of Ecological Systems. - 1973. – no.4. –pp.1-24.

Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. - New York: Crown Publishing Group, 2012. URL: https://norayr.am/collections/books/Why-Nations-Fail-Daron-Acemoglu.pdf (accessed 12 May 2021).

Haines-Young R., Potschin M. Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August–December 2012. – EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003. – 2013.

Доклад «Климатическая повестка России: реагируя на международные вызовы». - М.: Фонд «ЦСР», Аналитический центр ТЭК РЭА Минэнерго России, ООО «Ситуационный центр», 2021 г. URL:https://www.csr.ru/upload/iblock/521/521091011093dc8b5ece74cdd8552680.pdf