Dumont, Michel (2022): Public support to business research and development in Belgium: fourth evaluation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_115418.pdf Download (16MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Belgium met its Europe 2020 target that Research and Development (R&D) expenditures should equal 3% of Gross Domestic Product. This report presents the results of an evaluation of the extent to which public support to business R&D has been instrumental in reaching this target, by stimulat-ing additional R&D expenditures of firms. Regional direct support (subsidies), and the federal par-tial exemption from payment of the withholding tax on the wages of R&D personnel, appear to en-courage firms to increase their investment in R&D activities, in addition to the amount of public support that they receive. By contrast, some incentives provided through corporate income taxation (CIT) seem to have no additionality effect or even result in the crowding out of firms’ own R&D ex-penditures. As the CIT incentives claim the lion’s share of the rapidly rising budgetary cost of public support to business R&D, the efficiency of tax incentives for R&D activities could be increased by introducing a cap on the total amount of public support that companies can receive, as suggested by the findings of a cross-country OECD study.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Public support to business research and development in Belgium: fourth evaluation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | business R&D; tax incentives; subsidies; policy mix; evaluation; spillovers |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H32 - Firm L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L10 - General L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L26 - Entrepreneurship O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 115418 |
Depositing User: | Michel Dumont |
Date Deposited: | 22 Nov 2022 08:41 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2023 15:30 |
References: | Acconcia, A. and C. Cantabene (2018). Liquidity and Firms’ Response to Fiscal Stimulus, Economic Journal 128(613), 1759-1785. Aghion, P., P. Askenazy, N. Berman, G. Cette and L. Eymard (2012). Credit Constraints and the Cy-clicality of R&D Investment: Evidence from France, Journal of the European Economic Association 10(5), 1001-1024. Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith and P. Howitt (2005). Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (2), 701-728. Akcigit, U., D. Hanley and N. Serrano-Velarde (2021). Back to Basics: Basic Research Spillovers, In-novation Policy, and Growth, The Review of Economic Studies 88(1), 1–43. Appelt, S., M. Bajgar, C. Criscuolo and F. Galindo-Rueda (2016). R&D Tax Incentives: Evidence on design, incidence and impacts”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 32, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlr8fldqk7j-en Appelt, S., M. Bajgar, C. Criscuolo and F. Galindo-Rueda (2020). The effects of R&D tax incentives and their role in the innovation policy mix: Findings from the OECD microBeRD project, 2016-19, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 92, OECD Publishing, Paris. Archibugi, D. and A. Filippetti (2018). The retreat of public research and its adverse consequences on innovation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 127, 97-111. Arellano, M. and S., Bond (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, Review of Economic Studies 58, 277–297. Arellano, M. and O. Bover (1995). Another look at instrumental variables estimation of er-ror-component models, Journal of Econometrics 68, 29–51. Argente, D., S. Balandze, D. Hanley and S. Moreira (2020). Patents to Products: Product Innovation and Firm Dynamics, FRB Atlanta Working Paper 2020-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Arora, A., S. Belenzon and A. Patacconi (2018). The Decline of Science in Corporate R&D, Strategic Management Journal 39(1), 3-32. Arora, A., A. Fosfuri and T. Roende (2022). Caught In the Middle: The Bias Against Startup Innova-tion With Technical And Commercial Challenges, NBER Working Paper 29654. Arqué-Castells, P. and P. Mohnen (2015). Sunk costs, extensive R&D subsidies and permanent in-ducement effects, Journal of Industrial Economics 63(3), 458-494. Arqué-Castells, P. and D. F. Spulber (2022). Measuring the Private and Social Returns to R&D: Un-intended Spillovers versus Technology Markets, Journal of Political Economy 130(7), 1860–1918. Bartelsman, E., G. van Leeuwen, H. Nieuwenhuijsen and K. Zeelenberg (1996). R&D and productiv-ity growth: evidence from firm-level data for the Netherlands, MPRA Paper 87740, University Library of Munich. Baslandze, S. (2021). Barriers to Creative Destruction: Large Firms and Nonproductive Strategies, FRB Atlanta Working Paper 2021-23, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Bellemare, M. F. and C.J. Wichman (2018). Elasticities and the Inverse Hyperbolic Sine Transfor-mation, downloaded from http://marcfbellemare.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Bellemare Wich-manIHSSeptember2018.pdf) Belz. T., D. Hagen and C. Steffens (2017). R&D Intensity and the Effective Tax Rate: A Meta Regres-sion Analysis, Journal of Economic Surveys 31(4), 988-1010. Biatour, B., M. Dumont and C. Kegels (2020). De belangrijkste bedrijfstakken voor O&O in België - Structurele ontwikkelingen (available in Dutch and French), Working Paper 7-20, Federal Plan-ning Bureau, Belgium. Bloom. N., C. I. Jones, J. Van Reenen and M. Webb (2020). Are ideas getting harder to find?, American Economic Review 110(4), 1104-1144. Bloom, N., J. Van Reenen and H. Williams (2019). A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation, Jour-nal of Economic Perspectives 33(3), 163-184. Blundell, R. and S. Bond (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel-data models, Journal of Econometrics 87, 115–143. Bodas Freitas, I., F. Castellacci, R. Fontana, F. Malerba and A. Vezzulli (2015). The additionality ef-fects of R&D tax credits across sectors: A cross-country microeconometric analysis, Working Pa-pers on Innovation Studies 20150424, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo. Bogliacino, F. and M. Pianta (2015). The Pavitt Taxonomy, Revisited. Patterns of Innovation in Manufacturing and Services, Documentos de Trabajo – Escuela de Economía 012631. Borenstein, M., L. Hedges and H. Rothstein (2007). Meta analysis: Fixed effect vs. random effects, www.Meta Analysis.com Borrás, S. and C. Edquist (2013). The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments, Technological Fore-casting and Social Change 80(8), 1513-1522. Bragoli. D., F. Cortelezzi, P. Giannoccolo and G. Marseguerra (2020). R&D Investment timing, de-fault and capital structure, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 54(3), 779-801. Busom, I. (2000). An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of R&D Subsidies, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 9(2), 111-148. Busom, I., Corchuelo, B. and E. Martínez-Ros (2017). Participation inertia in R&D tax incentive and subsidy programs, Small Business Economics 48(1), 153-177. Castellacci, F. and C.M. Lie (2015). Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? A Meta regression analysis, Research Policy 44(4), 819-832. Cerulli, G. (2010). Modelling and Measuring the Effect of Public Subsidies on Business R&D: A Crit-ical Review of the Econometric Literature, The Economic Record 86(274), 421-449. Chang A.C. (2012). Tax Policy Endogeneity: Evidence from R&D Tax Credits. Job Market paper, University of California – Irvine. Churchill, S. A., H. M. Luong and M. Ugur (2022). Does intellectual property protection deliver eco-nomic benefits? A multi-outcome Meta regression analysis of the evidence, Journal of Economic Surveys, forthcoming. Ciaffi, G., M. Deleidi and S. Di Bucchianico (2022). Stagnation despite ongoing innovation: Is R&D expenditure composition a missing link? An empirical analysis for the US (1948-2019), Depart-ment of Economics, University of Siena. Clausen, T. (2008). Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firmlevel?, Working Paper on Innovation Studies 20070615, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo. Coad, A., N. Mathew and E. Pugliese (2020). What’s good for the goose ain’t good for the gander: heterogeneous innovation capabilities and the performance effects of R&D, Industrial and Corpo-rate Change 29(3), 621-644. Coad, A., A. Segarra-Blasco and M. Teruel (2021). A bit of basic, a bit of applied? R&D strategies and firm performance, The Journal of Technology Transfer 46(6), 1758-1783. Coe, D. and E. Helpman (1995), International R&D spillovers, European Economic Review 39(5), 859-887. Council of the European Union (2018). ERAC Plenary 17-18 September - agenda item 5.1. Strategic debate: how to improve national Research and Innovation systems of Member States and Asso-ciated Countries - Policy paper WK 9384/2018 INIT. Council of the European Union (2020). Council conclusions on the New European Research Area, Brussels, 1 December 2020. Court of Audit (2021). CIT Tax Incentives for Research & Development (R&D) (available in Dutch and French), Brussels. https://www.ccrek.be/EN/Publications/Fiche.html?id=0a886975-366b-4745-b3cc-89a57ad36b17 Crescenzi, R., A. Dyèvre and F. Neffke (2022). Innovation Catalysts: How Multinationals Reshape the Global Geography of Innovation, Economic Geography 98(3), 199-227. Criscuolo, C., N. Gonne, K. Kitazawa and G. Lalanne. (2022). Are industrial policy instruments ef-fective?: A review of the evidence in OECD countries, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Paper, No. 128, OECD Publishing. Crowley, F. and D. Jordan (2022). Do local start-ups and knowledge spillovers matter for firm-level R&D investment?, Urban Studies 59(5), 1085-1102. Cusolito, A. P., A. Garcia-Marin and W. F. Maloney (2021). Proximity to the Frontier, Markups, and the Response of Innovation to Foreign Competition: Evidence from Matched Produc-tion-Innovation Surveys in Chile, Policy Research Working Paper Series 9757, The World Bank. David, P., B. Hall and A. Toole (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence, Research Policy 29(4-5), 497-529. Dieppe, A. and J. Mutl (2013). International R&D Spillovers: Technology Transfer vs. R&D Synergies, Working Paper Series 1504, European Central Bank. Dimos, C. and G. Pugh (2016). The effectiveness of R & D subsidies: a Meta regression analysis of the evaluation literature, Research Policy 45(4), 797-815. Dimos, C., G. Pugh, M. Hisarciklilar, E. Talam and I. Jackson (2022). The relative effectiveness of R&D tax credits and R&D subsidies: A comparative Meta regression analysis, Technovation 115, 102450. Dumont, M. (2012). De impact van subsidies en fiscale voordelen op onderzoek en ontwikkeling van ondernemingen in België (2001-2009), Working Paper 08-12, Federal Planning Bureau (in Dutch, also available in French). Dumont, M. (2013). The impact of subsidies and fiscal incentives on corporate R&D expenditures in Belgium (2001-2009), Working Paper 01-13, Federal Planning Bureau. Dumont, M. (2015). Evaluation of federal tax incentives for private R&D in Belgium: An update, Working Paper 5-15, Federal Planning Bureau. Dumont, M. (2019). Tax incentives for business R&D in Belgium - Third evaluation, Working Paper 4-19, Federal Planning Bureau. Dumont, M., A. Spithoven and P. Teirlinck (2016). Public Support for R&D and the Educational Mix of R&D Employees, CESifo Economic Studies 62(3), 426-452. Dziallas, M and K. Blind (2019). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An ex-tensive literature analysis, Technovation 80, 3-29. Eberhardt, M., C. Helmers and H. Strauss (2013). Do Spillovers Matter When Estimating Private Returns to R&D?, The Review of Economics and Statistics 95(2), 436-448. Eeckhout, J. (2021). The Profit Paradox. How Thriving Firms Threaten the Future of Work, Princeton University Press. Einiö, E. (2014). R&D Subsidies and Company Performance: Evidence from Geographic Variation in Government Funding Based on the ERDF Population- Density Rule, Review of Economics and Sta-tistics 96(4), 710–728. European Commission (2014). Common methodology for State aid evaluation, Commission Staff Working Document SWD(2014) 179 final. European Commission (2018). Workshop on Recent policy developments and evidence of impact of R&D tax incentives schemes: the case of France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Italy, 13 June 2018. European Commission (2021). Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1237 of 23 July 2021 amending Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty, Official Journal of the European Union. European Commission (2022). Science, research and innovation performance of the EU 2022 – Building a sustainable future in uncertain times, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. European Union (2017). EU framework programmes for research and innovation: Evolution and key data from FP1 to Horizon 2020 in view of FP9. Farre-Mensa, J. and A. Ljungqvist (2016). Do Measures of Financial Constraints Measure Financial Constraints?, The Review of Financial Studies 29(2), 271–308. Faulhaber, L.V. (2017). The Luxembourg Effect: Patent Boxes and the Limits of International Coop-eration, Minnesota Law Review 163, 1641-1702. Gaessler, F., B. H. Hall and D. Harhoff (2021). Should there be lower taxes on patent income?, Re-search Policy 50(1), 104129. Goolsbee, A. (1998). Does Government R&D Policy mainly benefit Scientists and Engineers?, Ameri-can Economic Review 88(2), 292-302. Greene, W.H. (2000). Econometric Analysis (Fourth Edition), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (NJ). Greenland S., S.J. Senn, K.J. Rothman, J.B. Carlin, C. Poole, S.N. Goodman and D.G. Altman (2016). Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations, Europe-an Journal of Epidemiology 31, 337-350. Griliches, Z. and J.A. Hausman (1986). Errors in variables in panel data, Journal of Econometrics 31(1), 93-118. Guerrero, A.J., J. Heijs and E. Huergo (2022). The effect of technological relatedness on firm sales evolution through external knowledge sourcing, The Journal of Technology Transfer, forthcoming. Guillard, C., R. Martin, P. Mohnen, C. Thomas and D. Verhoeven (2021). Efficient industrial policy for innovation: standing on the shoulders of hidden giants, Discussion Paper No.1813, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science. Halpern, L. and B. Muraközy (2015). The relationship between competition and R&D: Theoretical Approaches and Quantitative Results, in: P. Valentiny, F. L. Kiss., K. Antal-Pomazi and C. I. Nagy (eds.), Competition and Regulation, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 113-137. Hambÿe, C., B.K. Michel, G., Trachez and G. De Menten (2022). Les groupes multinationaux en Bel-gique - Structure et activité économique, Working Paper 5-22, Federal Planning Bureau. Heckman, J.J. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error, Econometrica 47(1), 153-161. Heckman, J.J. (2010). Selection Bias and Self-Selection, in: Durlauf, S.N. and L.E. Blume (eds) Micro-econometrics. The New Palgrave Economics Collection. Palgrave Macmillan. Hervás-Oliver, J.-L., M. D. Parrilli, A. Rodríguez-Pose and F. Sempere-Ripoll (2021). The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU, Research Policy 50(9), 104316. Heyvaert, W. (2018). Belgium’s New Innovation Income Deduction Regime, European Taxation 58(5), 206-209. Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust Standard Errors for Panel Regressions with Cross-Sectional Dependence, Stata Journal 7(3), 281-312. Huergo, E. and L. Moreno (2017). Subsidies or loans? Evaluating the impact of R&D support pro-grammes, Research Policy 46(7), 1198-1214. Hussinger, K. (2008). R&D and subsidies at the firm level: an application of parametric and semi-parametric two-step selection models, Journal of Applied Econometrics 23(6), 729-747. Imbens, G.W. (2021). Statistical Significance, p-Values, and the Reporting of Uncertainty, Journal of Economic Perspectives 35(3), 157-174. IMF (2021). Research and Innovation: Fighting the Pandemic and Boosting Long-Term Growth, Chapter 3 of World Economic Outlook October 2021. Janssens, M. and A. Luyten (2021). Spending review: Exemption of transfer of withheld payroll tax, FPS Finance, Expertise and Strategic Support, Studies department, Tax Policy Unit. Knoll, B., N. Riedel, T. Schwab, M. Todtenhaupt and J. Voget (2021), Cross-border effects of R&D tax incentives, Research Policy 50(9), 104326. Labeaga, J. M., E. Martínez-Ros, A. Sanchis and J.A. Sanchis (2021). Does persistence in using R&D tax credits help to achieve product innovations?, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 173(C), 121065. Lahr, H. and A. Mina (2021). Endogenous financial constraints and innovation, Industrial and Cor-porate Change 30(3), 587–621. Lehto, E. (2007). Regional Impact of Research and Development on Productivity, Regional Studies 41(5), 623-638. Lenihan, H., K. Mulligan, J. Doran, C. Rammer and O. Ipinnaiye (2022). R&D grant and tax credit support for foreign-owned subsidiaries: Does it pay off?, ZEW Discussion Papers 22-003, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research. Leppälä, S. (2020). Innovation, R&D Spillovers, and the Variety and Concentration of the Local In-dustry Structure, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 122(3), 1231-1255. Lichtenberg, F.R. (1988). The Private R&D Investment Response to Federal Design and Technical Competitions, American Economic Review 78(3), 550-559. Lokshin B. and P. Mohnen (2013). Do R&D tax incentives lead to higher wages for R&D workers?: Evidence from the Netherlands, Research Policy 42(3), 823-830. Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities, Industrial and Corporate Change 27(5), 803–815. McGrayne, S. B. (2011). The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes’ Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Contro-versy, Yale University Press. Meuleman, M. and W. De Maeseneire (2012). Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs’ access to external fi-nancing?, Research Policy 41(3), 580-591. Mezzanotti, F. and T. Simcoe (2022). Innovation and Appropriability: Revisiting the Role of Intel-lectual Property, Working Paper 22-09, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau. Mina, A., H. Lahr and A. Hughes (2013). The demand and supply of external finance for innovative firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 22(4), 869–901. Møen, J. and H. S. Thorsen (2017). Publication Bias in the Returns to R&D Literature, Journal of the Knowledge Economy 8(3), 987-1013. Mohnen, P. (2017). The effectiveness of R&D tax incentives. Design and Evaluation of Innovation Policies Workshop, Lima, Peru. Mohnen, P. (2022). Taxation and Innovation, Technical Note N° IDB-TN-2480, Inter-American De-velopment Bank. Murray, M.P. (2006). Avoiding Invalid Instruments and Coping with Weak Instruments, Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(4), 111-132. Murray, M.P. (2010). The Bad, the Weak, and the Ugly: Avoiding the Pitfalls of Instrumental Varia-bles Estimation, Bates College. Neves, P. C., O. Alfonso, D. Silva and E. Sochirca (2021). The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A Meta analysis, Economic Modelling 97(C), 196-209. OECD (2021 a). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2021: Times of Crisis and Oppor tunity, OECD Publishing, Paris. OECD (2021 b). State of play of R&D and innovation support measurement and analysis activities involving NESTI, Working Party of National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators, DSTI/STP/NESTI(2021)3. OECD (2021 c). Micro-data based insights into trends in business R&D performance and funding - Findings from the OECD microBeRD+ project, Working Party of National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators, DSTI/STP/NESTI(2021)5. Okamuro, H. (2007). Determinants of successful R&D cooperation in Japanese small businesses: The impact of organizational and contractual characteristics, Research Policy 36(10), 1529-1544. Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy 13(6), 343–373. Pesaran, M. H. and R. P. Smith (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogene-ous panels, Journal of Econometrics 68, 79–113. Rao N. (2016). Do Tax Credits Stimulate R&D Spending? The Effect of the R&D Tax Credit in its First Decade, Journal of Public Economics 140(C), 1-12. Rodríguez-Pose, A. and C. Wilkie (2016). Context and the role of policies to attract foreign R&D in Europe, European Planning Studies 24(11), 2014-2035. Sampat, B.N. (2018). A Survey of Empirical Evidence on Patents and Innovation, NBER Working Paper 25383, National Bureau of Economic Research. Sampson, T. (2022). Technology Transfer in Global Value Chains, CESifo Working Paper No. 9532. Santos Silva, J.M.C. and S. Tenreyro (2006). The Log of Gravity, Review of Economics and Statistics 88(4), 641-658. Schankerman, M. (1981). The Effects of Double-Counting and Expensing on the Measured Returns to R&D, The Review of Economics and Statistics 63(3), 454-458. Schot, J. and W.E. Steinmueller (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innova-tion and transformative change, Research Policy 47 (9), 1554-1567. Soete, L., B. Verspagen and T. Ziesemer (2022). The economic impact of public R&D: an international perspective, Industrial and Corporate Change 31(1), 1–18. Sterne J.A.C. and R.M. Harbord (2004). Funnel Plots in Meta analysis, The Stata Journal 4(2), 127-141. Stevens, G.A. and J. Burley (1997). 3,000 Raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success!, Research-Technology Management 40(3), 16-27. Tassey, G. (2007). Tax incentives for innovation: time to restructure the R&E tax credit, The Journal of Technology Transfer 32(6), 605-615. Tidd, J., J. Bessant and K. Pavitt (2005). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. Wiley and Sons. Ugur, M., E. Trushin, E. Solomon and F. Guidi (2016). R&D and productivity in OECD firms and in-dustries: A hierarchical Meta regression analysis, Research Policy 45(10), 2069-2086. Valenduc, C. (2019). Estimating governmental support for business R&D in Belgium, presented at the Workshop of the OECD Expert Network on R&D Tax Incentive Design and Indicators, March 22, London. Van de Velde, E. and F. Cannas (2021). Harmful tax practices within the EU: definition, identifica-tion and recommendations, document provided by the Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies at the request of the subcommittee on Tax Matters of the European Parliament. Van Reenen, J. (2021). Innovation policy to restore American prosperity, CentrePiece - The magazine for economic performance 599, Centre for Economic Performance (LSE). Van Reenen, J. (2022). Innovation and Human Capital Policy, in: Innovation and Public Policy, 61-83, National Bureau of Economic Research. Wallsten, S. (2000). The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program, RAND Journal of Economics 31(1), 82-100. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (second edition), MIT Press. Wooldridge, J. M. (2021). Two-Way Fixed Effects, the Two-Way Mundlak Regression, and Differ-ence-in-Differences Estimators. Wursten, J. (2018). Testing for serial correlation in fixed-effects panel models, Stata Journal 18(1), 76-100. March. Zavertiaeva, M.A., F.J. López‐Iturriaga and E.V. Kuminova (2018). Better innovators or more inno-vators? Managerial overconfidence and corporate R&D, Managerial and Decision Economics 39(4), 447-461. Zúñiga-Vicente, J.A., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F.J. and J.I. Galán (2014). Assessing the Effect of Public Subsidies on Firm R&D Investment: A Survey, Journal of Economic Surveys 28(1), 36-67. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/115418 |