Mohajan, Devajit and Mohajan, Haradhan (2022): Exploration of Coding in Qualitative Data Analysis: Grounded Theory Perspective. Published in: Research and Advances in Education , Vol. 1, No. 6 (6 December 2022): pp. 50-60.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_115551.pdf Download (505kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study tries to identify, define, and analyze the coding techniques that the grounded theory researchers follow when they develop the qualitative research. Grounded theory is a qualitative research analysis that systematically collects and analyzes data to develop a new theory on human behavior in social welfare perceptions. It also tries to discuss coding method, coding cycle, theoretical sensitivity, theoretical sampling, theoretical saturation, etc. Usually a code is a word or short phrases that symbolically allocate a summative, salient, and essence capturing for a portion of visual data. In qualitative grounded theory research coding plays an important role that enables the researchers to identify, organize, and build new theory that is grounded in data. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of codes, coding, and coding methods that form a qualitative grounded theory.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Exploration of Coding in Qualitative Data Analysis: Grounded Theory Perspective |
English Title: | Exploration of Coding in Qualitative Data Analysis: Grounded Theory Perspective |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Grounded theory, qualitative research, data analysis, coding procedures |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being |
Item ID: | 115551 |
Depositing User: | Haradhan Kumar Mohajan |
Date Deposited: | 07 Dec 2022 01:38 |
Last Modified: | 07 Dec 2022 01:38 |
References: | Babchuk, W. A. (2011). Grounded Theory as a “Family of Methods”: A Genealogical Analysis to Guide Research. US-China Education Review, 8(9), 383-388. Backman, K., & Kyngäs, H. (1999). Challenges of the Grounded Theory Approach to a Novice Approach. Nursing and Health Sciences, 1(3), 147-153. Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications Ltd., Washington DC. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods (5th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Bulmer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bytheway, J. (2018). Grounded Theory to Explore Learners’ Perspectives of Workplace Learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(3), 249-259. Chametzky, B. (2016). Coding in Classic Grounded Theory: I’ve Done an Interview; Now What? Sociology Mind, 6, 163-172. Charmaz, K. (2000). Constructivist and Objectivist Grounded Theory. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd Ed.), pp. 509-535. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. Charmaz, K. (2009). Shifting the Grounds: Constructivist Grounded Theory. In J. M. Morse, P. N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, & A. E. Clarke (Eds.), Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation, pp. 127-193. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc. Charmaz, K. (2010). Studying the Experience of Chronic Illness through Grounded Theory. In G. Scambler & S. Scambler (Eds.), New Directions in the Sociology of Chronic and Disabling Conditions: Assaults on the Lifeworld. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Charmaz, K. (2011). A Constructivist Grounded Theory Analysis of Losing and Regaining a Valued Self. In Wertz, F. J., Charmaz, K., McMullen, L. J., Josselson, R., Anderson, R., & McSpadden, E. (Eds), pp. 165-204. Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis: Phenomenological Psychology, Grounded Theory, Discourse Analysis, Narrative Research, and Intuitive Inquiry. Guilford Press, New York. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd Ed.). London: Sage Publications. Charmaz, K. (2017). Continuities, Contradictions, and Critical Inquiry in Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1-8. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research, Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th Ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (5th Ed.). Sydney, Australia: Pearson. Cullen, M. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2021). Grounded Theory: Description, Divergences and Application. Accounting, Finance, & Governance Review, 27(1), 8-20. Dey, I. (1990). Grounding Grounded Theory Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry. San Diego: Academic Press. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. Díaz, J., Pérez, J., Gallardo, C., & González-Prieto, Á. (2021). Applying Inter-rater Reliability and Agreement in Grounded Theory Studies in Software Engineering. arXiv:2107.11449v1 [cs.SE] 23 Jul 2021. Douglas, D. (2003). Inductive Theory Generation: A Grounded Approach to Business Inquiry. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. 2(1), 47-54. Elliott, N., & Lazenbatt, A. (2005). How to Recognise a ‘Quality’ Grounded Theory Research Study. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(3), 48-52. Evans, G. L. (2013). A Novice Researcher’s First Walk through the Maze of Grounded Theory: Rationalization for Classic Grounded Theory. Grounded Theory Review, 12(1), 37-55. Flick, U. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (4th Ed.). Sage Publications Ltd. Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (6th Ed.). London: Sage Publications. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA, USA. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA, USA. Glaser, B. G. (2005). The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding. Sociology Press Mill Valley, CA, USA. Glaser, B. G. (2016). Open Coding Descriptions. The Grounded Theory Review, 15(2), 108-110. Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2007). Remodeling Grounded Theory. Historical Social Research, 19, 47-68. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Gordon-Finlayson, A. (2010). QM2: Grounded Theory. In M. A. Forrester (Ed.), Doing Qualitative Research in Psychology, pp. 154-176. London: Sage Publications. Hernandez, C. A. (2009). Theoretical Coding in Grounded Theory Methodology. Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal, 8(3), 51-66. Holton, J. A. (2008). Grounded Theory as a General Research Methodology. The Grounded Theory Review, 7(2), 67-89. Holton, J. A. (2010). The Coding Process and Its Challenges. Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal, 9(1), 21- 40. Jones, M., & Alony, I. (2011). Guiding the Use of Grounded Theory in Doctoral Studies: An Example from the Australian Film Industry. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 95-114. Khanal, K. P. (2018). Constructivist Grounded Theory Practice in Accountability Research. Journal of Education and Research, 8(1), 61-88. LaRossa, R. (2005). Grounded Theory Methods and Qualitative Family Research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 837-857. Linneberg, M. S., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding Qualitative Data: A Synthesis Guiding the Novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259-270. Mey, G., & Mruck, K. (2011). Grounded Theory Methodologie: Entwicklung, Stand, Perspektiven (Grounded Theory Methodology: Development, Status Quo, and Perspectives). In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Grounded Theory Reader, pp. 11-48. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th Ed.). London: Sage Publications. Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 25-35. Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. K. (2022a). Profit Maximization Strategy in an Industry: A Sustainable Procedure. Law and Economy, 1(3), 17-43. https://doi:10.56397/LE.2022.10.02 Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. K. (2022b). Families of Grounded Theory: A Theoretical Structure for Novel Researchers. Unpublished Manuscript. Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. K. (2022c). Constructivist Grounded Theory: A New Research Approach in Social Science. Research and Advances in Education, 1(4), 8-16. Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. K. (2022d). Feminism and Feminist Grounded Theory: A Comprehensive Research Analysis. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 11(3), 49-61. Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. K. (2022e). Memo Writing Procedures in Grounded Theory Research Methodology. Studies in Social Science & Humanities, 1(4), 10-18. Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University Economic Series, 17(3), 58-82. Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23-48. Mohajan, H. K. (2020). Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 9(4), 50-79. Mohajan, H. K. (2022a). Four Waves of Feminism: A Blessing for Global Humanity. Studies in Social Science & Humanities, 1(2), 1-8. https://doi:10.56397/SSSH.2022.09.01 Mohajan, H. K. (2022b). An Overview on the Feminism and Its Categories. Research and Advances in Education, 1(3), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2022.09.02 Morse, J. M., Stern, P. N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., & Clarke, A. (2009). Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press. Noble, H., & Mitchell, G. (2016). What is Grounded Theory? Evidence-Based Nursing, 19(2), 34-35. National Association of Social Workers (NASW) (2021). National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Code of Ethics. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English Qureshi, H. A., & Unlu, Z. (2020). Beyond the Paradigm Conflicts: A Four-Step Coding Instrument for Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-10. Richards, K. A. R., & Hemphill, M. A. (2018). A Practical Guide to Collaborative Qualitative Data Analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37 (2), 225-231. Rieger, K. L. (2019). Discriminating among Grounded Theory Approaches. Nursing Inquiry, 26, e12261. Rogers, R. (2018). Coding and Writing Analytic Memos on Qualitative Data: A Review of Johnny Saldaña’s the Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 23(4), 889-892. Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd Ed.). Sage Publications Ltd. Sarker, S., Lau, F., & Sahay, S. (2000). Building an Inductive Theory of Collaboration in Virtual Teams: An Adapted Grounded Theory Approach. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 10. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Maui, HI, USA. Scott, C. W., & Medaugh, M. R. (2017). Axial Coding. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1-2. Sebastian, K. (2019). Distinguishing Between the Types of Grounded Theory: Classical, Interpretive and Constructivist. Journal for Social Thought, 3(1), 1-9. Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant Observation. Waveland Press. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Thomson, O. P., Petty, N. J., & Scholes, J. (2014). Grounding Osteopathic Research-Introducing Grounded Theory. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 17(3), 167-186. Tie, C. Y, Birks, M, & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded Theory Research: A Design Framework for Novice Researchers. Sage Open Medicine Volume, 7, 1-8. Tossy, T. (2015). Doing Classic Grounded Theory Methodology in Information Systems Research: How to Create and Sustain Transparency? International Journal of Computing and ICT Research, 8(2), 22-31. Urquhart, C. (2013). Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide. London, UK: Sage Publications. Vollstedt, M. (2015). To See the Wood for the Trees: The Development of Theory from Empirical Data Using Grounded Theory. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research: Methodologies and Methods in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education Series, pp. 23-48. Heidelberg: Springer. Vollstedt, M., & Rezat, S. (2019). An Introduction to Grounded Theory with a Special Focus on Axial Coding and the Coding Paradigm. Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education, 13, 81-100. Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006). Grounded Theory: An Exploration of Process and Procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 547-559. Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The Art of Coding and Thematic Exploration in Qualitative Research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45-55. Wuest, J. (1997). Fraying Connections of Caring Women: An Exemplar of Including Difference in the Development of Explanatory Frameworks. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 29(2), 99-116. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/115551 |