Mohajan, Devajit and Mohajan, Haradhan (2022): Development of Grounded Theory in Social Sciences: A Qualitative Approach. Published in: Studies in Social Science & Humanities , Vol. 5, No. 1 (6 December 2022): pp. 13-24.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_115552.pdf Download (407kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Grounded theory (GT) is a general research method that provides the efficient generation of theory from data, which are collected by a strong, sound, and fair research method. It is an inductive methodology that systematically collects and analyzes data for developing theory on human behavior in social welfare perspectives. It is considered as one of the most popular qualitative research methodologies in the world. It is originally developed by two American sociologists Barney Galland Glaser and Anselm Leonard Strauss in 1967 through the publication of their revolutionary book “The Discovery of Grounded Theory”. It emphasizes the importance of developing an understanding of human behavior through a process of discovery. Grounded theory has originated in sociology, and at present it has become a key methodological setting in a wide range of other disciplines, such as in nursing, physiotherapy, healthcare, education, anthropology, psychology, management, information systems, software engineering, etc. It is useful both for expert and novice researchers to generate new explanatory theories. This article tries to discuss grounded theory methodology through the discussion of its origin and development, basic principles, characteristics, advantages and disadvantages, and its usefulness in social science researches for qualitative analysis.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Development of Grounded Theory in Social Sciences: A Qualitative Approach |
English Title: | Development of Grounded Theory in Social Sciences: A Qualitative Approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Grounded theory, qualitative research, Glaser, Strauss |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I24 - Education and Inequality I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination |
Item ID: | 115552 |
Depositing User: | Haradhan Kumar Mohajan |
Date Deposited: | 07 Dec 2022 01:38 |
Last Modified: | 07 Dec 2022 01:38 |
References: | Awbrey, J., & Awbrey, S. (1995). Interpretation as Action: The Risk of Inquiry. Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines, 15(1), 40-52. Babchuk, W. A. (2011). Grounded Theory as a “Family of Methods”: A Genealogical Analysis to Guide Research. US-China Education Review, 8(9), 383-388. Baglione, L. (2012). Writing a Research Paper in Political Science. Thousand Oaks, California: CQ Press. Benoliel, J. Q. (1996). Grounded Theory and Nursing Knowledge. Qualitative Health Research, 6(3), 406-428. Berthelsen, C. B., Grimshaw-Aagaard, S. L. S., & Hansen, C. (2018). Developing a Guideline for Reporting and Evaluating Grounded Theory Research Studies (GUREGT). International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(1), 64-76. Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications Ltd., Washington DC. Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007). Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory. Health Services Research, 42(4), 1758-1772. Bryant, A. (2002). Re-Grounding Grounded Theory. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4(1), 25-42. Bryant, A. (2018). Grounded Theory and Grounded Theorizing: Pragmatism in Research Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Bryant, A. (2021). Continual Permutations of Misunderstanding: The Curious Incidents of the Grounded Theory Method. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(3-4), 397-411. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Grounded Theory in Historical Perspective: An Epistemological Account. In A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, pp. 31-57. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Charmaz, K. (1995). Between Positivism and Postmodernism: Implications for Methods. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 17, 43 72. Charmaz, K. (2000). Constructivist and Objectivist Grounded Theory. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd Ed.), pp. 509-535. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, pp. 249-291. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, Sage Publications. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. Charmaz, K. (2008). Constructionism and the Grounded Theory. In J. A. Hostein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of Constructionist Research, pp. 397-412. New York: The Guilford Press. Charmaz, K. (2009). Shifting the Grounds: Constructivist Grounded Theory. In J. M. Morse, P. N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, & A. E. Clarke (Eds.), Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation, pp. 127-193. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc. Charmaz, K. (2012). The Power and Potential of Grounded Theory. Medical Sociology Online, 6(3), 2-15. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd Ed.). London: SAGE Publications. Charmaz, K. (2016). Constructivist Grounded Theory. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 299-300. Charmaz, K. (2017). Continuities, Contradictions, and Critical Inquiry in Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1-8. Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The Pursuit of Quality in Grounded Theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305-327. Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research, Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th Ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (5th Ed.). Sydney, Australia: Pearson. Cullen, M. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2021). Grounded Theory: Description, Divergences and Application. Accounting, Finance, & Governance Review, 27(1), 8-20. Devadas, U. M., Silong, A. D., & Ismail, I. A. (2011). The Relevance of Glaserian and Straussian Grounded Theory Approaches in Researching Human Resource Development. 2011 International Conference on Financial Management and Economics, Volume 11, pp. 348-352, IACSIT Press, Singapore. Duchscher, J. E. B., & Morgan, D. (2004). Grounded Theory: Reflections on the Emergence vs. Forcing Debate. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(6), 605-612. Edwina, M., & McDonald, S. D. (2019). Examining the use of Glaser and Strauss’s Version of the Grounded Theory in Research. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(6S3), 1021-1026. Elliott, N., & Lazenbatt, A. (2005). How to Recognise a ‘Quality’ Grounded Theory Research Study. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(3), 48-52. Engward, H. (2013). Understanding Grounded Theory. Nursing Standard, 28(7), 37-41. Gibbs, G. (2008). Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Sage Publications. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2008). Metaphor and Thought: The State of the Art. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press. Glaser, B. G. (1992a). Emergence vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, USA. Glaser, B. G. (1992b). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA, USA. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA, USA. Glaser, B. G. (2001). The Grounded Theory Perspective Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. Mill Valley, CA Sociology Press. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Goulding, C. (1998). Grounded Theory: The Missing Methodology on the Interpretivist Agenda. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 1(1), 50-57. Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Hallberg, L. (2006). The “Core-Category” of Grounded Theory: Making Constant Comparisons. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 1(3), 141-148. Heath, H., & Cowley, S. (2004). Developing a Grounded Theory Approach: A Comparison of Glaser and Strauss. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 2, 141-150. Holton, J., & Walsh, I. (2017). Classic Grounded Theory: Applications with Qualitative and Quantitative Data. Sage Publications, Inc. Hood, J. C. (2007). Orthodoxy vs. Power: The Defining Traits of Grounded Theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, pp. 151-164. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications. Howell, K. E. (2012). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Methodology. Sage Publications, London. Hussein, M. E., Hirst, S., Salyers, V., & Osuji, J. (2014). Using Grounded Theory as a Method of Inquiry: Advantages and Disadvantages. The Qualitative Report, 19(27), 1-15. Kelle, U. (2007). The Development of Categories: Different Approaches to Grounded Theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, pp. 191-213. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Kenny, M., & Fourie, R. (2015). Contrasting Classic, Straussian, and Constructivist Grounded Theory: Methodological and Philosophical Conflicts. The Qualitative Report, 20(8), 1270-1289. Khan, S. N. (2014). Qualitative Research Method: Grounded Theory. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(11), 224-233. Khanal, K. P. (2018). Constructivist Grounded Theory Practice in Accountability Research. Journal of Education and Research, 8(1), 61-88. Locke, K. (2001). Grounded Theory in Management Research. London, England: Sage Publications. McCaslin, M. L., & Scott, K. W. (2003). The Five-Question Method for Framing a Qualitative Research Study. The Qualitative Report, 8 (1), 447-461. McClement, S. E., & Harlos, M. (2008). When Advanced Cancer Patients Won’t Eat: Family Responses. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 14(4), 182-188. Milliken, P. (2010). Grounded Theory. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Research Design, pp. 549-554. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 25-35. Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. K. (2022a). Profit Maximization Strategy in an Industry: A Sustainable Procedure. Law and Economy, 1(3), 17-43. https://doi:10.56397/LE.2022.10.02 Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University Economic Series, 17(3), 58-82. Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23-48. Mohajan, H. K. (2020). Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 9(4), 50–79. Mohajan, H. K. (2022a). Four Waves of Feminism: A Blessing for Global Humanity. Studies in Social Science & Humanities, 1(2), 1-8. https://doi:10.56397/SSSH.2022.09.01 Mohajan, H. K. (2022b). An Overview on the Feminism and Its Categories. Research and Advances in Education, 1(3), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2022.09.02 Morse, J. M., Stern, P. N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., & Clarke, A. E. (2009). Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press. Muller, M. J., & Kogan, S. (2012). Grounded Theory Method in HCI and CSCW. The Human Computer Interaction Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton. Nathaniel, A. (Ed.) (2020). How to Read Classic Grounded Theory. The Grounded Theory Review, 19(2), 1-7. Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th Ed.). Pearson, Boston. Nicholls, D. (2009). Qualitative Research: Part One Philosophies. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(10), 526-533. Parker, L. D., & Roffey, B. H. (1997). Methodological Themes. Back to the Drawing Board: Revisiting Grounded Theory and the Everyday Accountant’s and Manager’s Reality. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(2), 212-247. Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches (1st Ed.). London, Thousand Oaks California, New Delhi: Sage Publications. Qureshi, H. A., & Unlu, Z. (2020). Beyond the Paradigm Conflicts: A Four-Step Coding Instrument for Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-10. Ralph, N., Birks, M., & Chapman, Y. (2015). The Methodological Dynamism of Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(4), 1-6. Rand, J. (2013). Action Learning and Constructivist Grounded Theory: Powerfully Overlapping Fields of Practice. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 10(3), 230-243. Rieger, K. L. (2019). Discriminating among Grounded Theory Approaches. Nursing Inquiry, 26, e12261. Schreiber, R. S., & Stern, P. N. (2001). Using Grounded Theory in Nursing. Springer Publishing Company, Inc. New York, NY. Simmons, O. E. (2006). Some Professional and Personal Notes on Research Methods, Systems Theory, and Grounded Action. World Futures, 62(7), 481-490. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, New York. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 273-285. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Suddaby, R. (2006). What Grounded Theory is Not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633-642. Thomson, O. P., Petty, N. J., & Scholes, J. (2014). Grounding Osteopathic Research-Introducing Grounded Theory. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 17(3), 167-186. Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167-186. Timonen, V., Foley, G., & Conlon, C. (2018). Challenges When Using Grounded Theory: A Pragmatic Introduction to Doing GT Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1-10. Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428. Unlu, Z. (2018). Grounded Theory Method in Applied Linguistics. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 35(2), 51-66. Urquhart, C. (2013). Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications, Ltd. Vidich, A. J., & Lyman, S. M. (2000). Qualitative Methods: Their History in Sociology and Anthropology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd Ed.), pp. 37- 84. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006). Grounded Theory: An Exploration of Process and Procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 547-559. Wuest, J. (1995). Feminist Grounded Theory: An Exploration of the Congruency and Tensions between Two Traditions in Knowledge Discovery Source. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 125-137. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/115552 |