Pre-suffrage impartiality, democratic experience and clientelism: How sequencing matters

Kyriacou, Andreas (2023): Pre-suffrage impartiality, democratic experience and clientelism: How sequencing matters.

Abstract

It has been asserted that clientelism today is weaker in countries that were endowed with impartial public administrations prior to the extension of suffrage because the presence of bureaucratic checks undermines clientelism as a viable political strategy. We empirically examine this claim based on a cross-section of up to 136 countries. While we do not find evidence of a direct link between pre-suffrage impartiality and contemporary clientelism we do find evidence of an indirect effect working through post-suffrage democratic experience. Pre-suffrage impartiality in the guise of impartial public administrations or, more generally, the rule of law, enhances both democratic stability and democratic quality. Experience with democracy in turn helps rein in clientelism by increasing the credibility of programmatic promises thus reducing the need for vote-maximizing politicians to seek political support through clientelistic exchange.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: sequencing; impartial bureaucracy; rule of law; democratic experience; extension of suffrage
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption

References

Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., Wacziarg, R., 2003. Fractionalization. J. Econ. Growth 8, 155–194.

Andersen, D., & Doucette, J. (2022). State First? A Disaggregation and Empirical Interrogation. British Journal of Political Science 52(1), 408-415.

Bardhan, G. (2022). Clientelism and Governance. World Development 152, 105797.

Boix C, Miller M and Rosato S (2013) A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comparative Political Studies 46 (2), 1523–1554.

Bryce, Viscount. The American Commonwealth. Volume 2. Liberty Fund, 1888.

Carothers, T., (2007). The “sequencing fallacy. The Journal of Democracy 18(1): 12-27.

Coppedge, M et al. (2022a). V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v12 Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.

Coppedge, M et al. (2022b). V-Dem Codebook v12 Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.

Corbett, J., Veenendaal, W (2018). Democracy in Small States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Cornell, A. Lapuente, V. (2014) Meritocratic administration and democratic stability. Democratization 21(7), 1286–1304.

Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Epstein, L. (1980). Political Parties in Western Democracies. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Routledge.

Fariss, C., Anders, T., Markowitz, J., Barnum, M. (2022). New estimates of over 500 years of historic GDP and population data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 66(3), 553–591.

Fukuyama, F., 2014. Political Order and Political Decay: from the Industrial Revolution to the Globalisation of Democracy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.

Gjerløw, H; Knutsen, C., Wig, T., Wilson, M. (2021) One Road to Riches? How State Building and Democratization Affect Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Elements in Political Economy.

Hicken, A., (2011). Clientelism. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 14, 289–310.

Keefer, P. (2007). Clientelism, credibility, and the policy choices of young democracies. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51(4), 804–821.

Keefer, P., Vlaicu, R. (2008). Democracy, credibility and clientelism. J. Law Econ. Organ. 24 (2), 371–406.

Kitschelt, H., Wilkinson, S., 2007. Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge University Press.

Kyriacou, A. (2020). Inequality and Governance. Routledge, London, New York.

Kyriacou, A. (2022). Clientelism and fiscal redistribution. Evidence across countries. European Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2022.102234

Lapuente V and Rothstein B (2014) Civil war Spain versus Swedish harmony: the quality of government factor. Comparative Political Studies 47(10), 1416–1441.

Licht, A., Goldsmith, C., Schwartz, S., 2007. Culture rules: the foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. J. Comp. Econ. 35, 659–688.

Marshall, M. (2020). Polity V Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2018 – Dataset User’s Manual. Center for Systemic Peace.

Nathan, N. (2019). Electoral Consequences of colonial invention: Brokers, chiefs, and distribution in Northern Ghana. World Politics 1–40.

North, C., Orman, W., Gwin, C., (2013). Religion, corruption, and the rule of law. J. Money Credit Bank 45 (5), 757–779.

Olsson, O. (2009). On the democratic legacy of colonialism. Journal of Comparative Economics 37(4), 534-551.

Rød, E., Knutsen, C., Hegre, H. (2020). The determinants of democracy: a sensitivity analysis. Public Choice 185, 87–111.

Ross, M. (2001). Does oil hinder democracy? World Politics 53 (3), 325-361.

Rothstein, B., Teorell, J. (2015a). Getting to Sweden, part I: War and malfeasance 1720–1850. Scandinavian Political Studies 38: 217–237.

Rothstein, B., Teorell, J. (2015b). Getting to Sweden, part II: Breaking with corruption in the 19th century. Scandinavian Political Studies 38: 238–254.

Scott, J. (1969). Corruption, machine politics and political change. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 63 (4), 1142–1158.

Scott, J. (1972). Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 66 (1), 91–113.

Shefter, M. (1994). Political Parties and the State. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Stokes, S., Dunning, T., Marcelo, M., Brusco, V. (2013). Brokers, Voters and Clientelism. The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Veenendaal, W., Corbett, J. (2020) Clientelism in small states: how smallness influences patron–client networks in the Caribbean and the Pacific, Democratization 27:1, 61-80.

Weber, Max. (1922/1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.