Popov, Vladimir (2023): Why the rich and the poor value freedom and equality differently.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_116563.pdf Download (726kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper aims at providing additional explanations of the shift in electoral preferences studied by Piketty (2018) – in the post-war period rich and educated voters in Western countries shifted from right-oriented to left-oriented political parties.
It is argued that high income individuals develop leftist views (in favor of redistribution, i.e. with preferences for equality relative to freedom), when they feel that income inequalities pose a danger to social stability and trust the government to carry out redistribution measures. The World Value Survey (WVS) data allow to measure the freedom versus equality preferences of the rich and poor respondents. It turns out that in countries with high income and wealth inequalities, high murder rate and high trust in the government, the rich tend to have more pro-equality and less pro-freedom preferences. The pattern for the poor respondents is similar, but less pronounced than for the rich.
There are two groups of countries/territories, where the rich respondents are more pro-equality and less pro-freedom oriented than the poor – high inequalities and murder rates group (mostly Latin America, where the trust to the government is low) and high trust to the government group (mostly East Asia and Middle East and North Africa, where inequalities and murder rates are low). The latter group may constitute a case of good equilibrium with the long term political stability, whereas the former group is better characterized as moving from bad to good equilibrium.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Why the rich and the poor value freedom and equality differently |
English Title: | Why the rich and the poor value freedom and equality differently |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Inequalities, redistribution, left and right political spectrum, equality versus freedom preferences of the rich and the poor, trust in the government. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior N - Economic History > N3 - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy > N30 - General, International, or Comparative |
Item ID: | 116563 |
Depositing User: | Vladimir Popov |
Date Deposited: | 02 Mar 2023 00:31 |
Last Modified: | 02 Mar 2023 00:31 |
References: | Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. (2001). Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities. NBER Working Paper, no. 8267. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. (2001). Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans Different? NBER Working Paper, no. 8198. Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. (2009). Preferences for redistribution. NBER Working Paper no. 14825. Forbes billionaires list, Https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list. GWR (2018). Global Wealth Report; Global Wealth Databook 2018. Credit Suisse. Retrieved from Https://www.credit-suisse.com/corporate/en/research/research-institute/global-wealth-report.html. Chapman, J. (2018). Inequality and Poor Law Policy in Late Victorian England. Retrieved from Http://eh.net/eha/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Chapman.pdf. Davies, J. B., Sandström, S., Shorrocks, A., and Wolff , E. N. (2007). Estimating the Level and Distribution of Global Household Wealth. WIDER Research Paper, no. 77. Retrieved from Https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/estimating-level-and-distribution-global-household-wealth. Marx, K., F. Engels (1969). Manifesto of the Communist Party. First Published: February 1848. - Marx/Engels Selected Works, Vol. One, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1969, pp. 98-137; Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the XXI Century. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Piketty, T. (2018). Brahmin Left vs Merchant Right: Rising Inequality & the Changing Structure of Political Conflict (Evidence from France, Britain and the US, 1948-2017). March 2018. EHESS and Paris School of Economics. Popov, V. (2014). Mixed Fortunes: An Economic History of China, Russia and the West. Oxford University Press, April 2014. Popov, V. (2019). Billionaires, millionaires, inequality and happiness. – MPRA paper No. 94081, May 2019. Popov, V. (2020). Which economic model is more competitive? The West and the South after the Covid-19 pandemic –Seoul Journal of Economics 2020, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 505-538. Popov, V. (2022). Why Europe looks so much like China: Big government and low income inequalities. - Asia and the Global Economy, January 2022, Vol.2, Issue 1. Popov, V., Jomo K. S., (2015). Income Inequalities in Perspective. – Development, Vol. 58, No. 2-3, 2015. Rajan, R., L. Zingales (2003). Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists: Unleashing the Power of Financial Markets to Create Wealth and Spread Opportunity. 2003 Crown Business , NY. Stiglitz, J. (2012). The price of inequality: How today's divided society endangers our future. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. UNODC (2023). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Https://dataunodc.un.org/dp-intentional-homicide-victims WDI (2023). World Development Indicators) database. Https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators Worldwide Governance Indicators (2023). Https://databank.worldbank.org/source/worldwide-governance-indicators WVS (2023). World Value Survey, 1st and 7th waves. Https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/116563 |