Díez-Alonso, Daniel (2020): Taxpayer Bias in Perceived Income Distributions.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_116775.pdf Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Contrary to the predictions of classical models, poor people tend to display lower support for redistribution owing to a biased perception about the income distribution in the society. This paper explores the potential effects of income taxes on perceived income distributions and income rank. I present a theoretical model that maps the information from the tax schedule onto informative signals that taxpayers use to infer their perceived position in the income distribution. Using probabilistic regression analysis on the General Social Survey, I find evidence supporting that the changes in perceptions of income ranks observed in the USA in the last decades were influenced by changes in the federal income tax system. To identify causality in a controlled environment, I then test the main predictions of the theoretical model by randomizing tax systems in two online experiments conducted on Amazon Mechanical Turk with American workers. Results of a large pilot identify statistically significant differences between individuals facing a proportional tax system with a unique average tax rate and those facing a progressive tax system with increasing marginal tax rates. Compared to no tax information (control), facing the progressive tax system used in the experiment induces a 12% higher perceived average income level and a 25% lower perceived probability of being above the average income level, while the proportional system does not generate significant differences. These findings encourage further research to identify the exact elements in a tax schedule that generate a bias that can affect support for redistributive policies.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Taxpayer Bias in Perceived Income Distributions |
English Title: | Taxpayer Bias in Perceived Income Distributions |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | income tax; perceived position; income position; redistribution; income bias; |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies |
Item ID: | 116775 |
Depositing User: | Daniel Diez-Alonso |
Date Deposited: | 22 Mar 2023 07:31 |
Last Modified: | 22 Mar 2023 07:31 |
References: | A. Alesina and P. Giuliano. Preferences for redistribution. In Handbook of social economics, volume 1, pages 93–131. Elsevier, 2011. R. Benabou. Inequality and growth. NBER macroeconomics annual, 11:11–74, 1996. R. Benabou and E. A. Ok. Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the POUM hypothesis. NBER Working Paper, (w6795), 1998. C. J. Boyce, G. D. Brown, and S. C. Moore. Money and happiness: Rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological science, 21(4):471–475, 2010. D. L. Chen, M. Schonger, and C. Wickens. {oTree} — {An} open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9:88–97, 2016. G. Cruces, R. Perez-Truglia, and M. Tetaz. Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98: 100–112, 2013. M. D. Evans and J. Kelley. Subjective social location: Data from 21 nations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(1):3–38, 2004. J. Fernandez-Albertos and A. Kuo. Income perception, information, and progressive taxation: Evidence from a survey experiment. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(1): 83–110, 2018. V. Gimpelson and D. Treisman. Misperceiving inequality. Economics & Politics, 30(1):27–54, 2018. O. P. Hauser and M. I. Norton. (mis) perceptions of inequality. Current opinion in psychology, 18: 21–25, 2017. K. B. Hvidberg, C. T. Kreiner, and S. Stantcheva. Social position and fairness views. NBER Working Paper, (w28099), 2020. 38 D. Kahneman and A. Tversky. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive psychology, 3(3):430–454, 1972. M. Karadja, J. Mollerstrom, and D. Seim. Richer (and holier) than thou? The effect of relative income improvements on demand for redistribution. Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(2): 201–212, 2017. L. Kenworthy and L. McCall. Inequality, public opinion and redistribution. Socio-Economic Review, 6(1):35–68, 2007. I. Kuziemko, M. I. Norton, E. Saez, and S. Stantcheva. How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. The American Economic Review, 105(4): 1478–1508, 2015. A. H. Meltzer and S. F. Richard. A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of political Economy, 89(5):914–927, 1981. T. Piketty. Social mobility and redistributive politics. The Quarterly journal of economics, 110(3): 551–584, 1995. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/116775 |