The Effects of Carbon Trading: Evidence from California’s ETS

Kramer, Niklas and Lessmann, Christian (2023): The Effects of Carbon Trading: Evidence from California’s ETS.

Abstract

We study the impact of California’s emission trading scheme on carbon emissions and economic outcomes. We use panel data for all US states and apply the synthetic control method to construct an optimal counterfactual for CO2 emissions, GDP, employment, and industry turnover as outcome variables. We find evidence for a modest decline in emissions and a net positive aggregate economic effect. While we estimate overall emissions to fall relative to the counterfactual by 0.9% annually and by 6.3% in total between 2013 and 2019, the effect is most evident in the electricity and buildings sector, accounting for an annual abatement of 6.2% and 1.4%, respectively. Our estimates suggest that California’s carbon trading scheme has so far not caused large reductions in overall CO2 emissions and has positively affected macroeconomic outcomes in the short run.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Carbon pricing, emission trading, cap and trade, economic effects, emission reduction, synthetic control
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O44 - Environment and Growth; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs ; Distributional Effects ; Employment Effects; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

Abadie, A. (2021). Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. Journal of Economic Literature, 59 (2), 391–425.

Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105 (490), 493–505.

Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2011). Synth: An R package for synthetic control methods in comparative case studies. Journal of Statistical Software, 42 (13).

Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review, 93 (1), 113–132.

Bayer, P., & Aklin, M. (2020). The European Union emissions trading system reduced CO2 emissions despite low prices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117 (16), 8804–8812.

Bernard, J. T., & Kichian, M. (2021). The impact of a revenue-neutral carbon tax on GDP dynamics: The case of British Columbia. Energy Journal, 42 (3), 205–223.

Best, R., Burke, P. J., & Jotzo, F. (2020). Carbon pricing efficacy: Cross-country evidence. Environmental Resource Economics, 77 (1), 69–94.

CARB. (2008). Climate change scoping plan: A framework for change (Report). California Air Resources Board.

Caron, J., Rausch, S., & Winchester, N. (2015). Leakage from sub-national climate policy: The case of California’s cap–and–trade program. The Energy Journal, 36 (2).

Cheze, B., Chevallier, J., Berghmans, N., & Alberola, E. (2020). On the CO2 emissions determinants during the EU ETS phases I and II: A plant-level analysis merging the EUTL and Platts power data. Energy Journal, 41 (4).

Colmer, J., Martin, R., Muˆuls, M., & Wagner, U. J. (2022). Does pricing carbon mitigate climate change? firm-level evidence from the European Union emissions trading scheme. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP16982.

Cullenward, D. (2014a). How California’s carbon market actually works. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 70 (5), 35–44.

Cullenward, D. (2014b). Leakage in California’s carbon market. The Electricity Journal, 27 (9), 36–48.

Cullenward, D., & Coghlan, A. (2016). Structural oversupply and credibility in California’s carbon market. The Electricity Journal, 29 (5), 7–14.

Cullenward, D., Inman, M., & Mastrandrea, M. D. (2019). Tracking banking in the Western Climate Initiative cap-and-trade program. Environmental Research Letters, 14 (12), 124037.

da Cruz, V. (2022). Cap-and-innovate: Evidence of regulation-induced innovation in California. Economics Working Paper Series - Center of Economic Research at ETH Zurich, 22.

Dechezlepretre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11 (2), 183–206.

Dechezlepretre, A., Nachtigall, D., & Venmans, F. (2023). The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 118, 102758.

Dong, F., Dai, Y. J., Zhang, S. N., Zhang, X. Y., & Long, R. Y. (2019). Can a carbon emission trading scheme generate the Porter effect? evidence from pilot areas in China. Science of the Total Environment, 653, 565–577.

Ellis, J., Nachtigall, D., & Venmans, F. (2020). Carbon pricing and competitiveness: Are they at odds? Climate Policy, 20 (9), 1070–1091.

Fell, H., & Maniloff, P. (2018). Leakage in regional environmental policy: The case of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 87, 1–23.

Ferman, B., Pinto, C., & Possebom, V. (2020). Cherry picking with synthetic controls. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39 (2), 510–532.

Goulder, L. H., & Stavins, R. N. (2011). Challenges from state-federal interactions in US climate change policy. American Economic Review, 101 (3), 253–257.

Hernandez-Cortes, D., & Meng, K. C. (2023). Do environmental markets cause environmental injustice? evidence from California’s carbon market. Journal of Public Economics, 217, 104786.

Hu, Y. C., Ren, S. G., Wang, Y. J., & Chen, X. H. (2020). Can carbon emission trading scheme achieve energy conservation and emission reduction? evidence from the industrial sector in China. Energy Economics, 85.

ICAP. (2022). Emission trading worldwide: Status report 2022 (Report). Berlin: International Carbon Action Partnership.

Jaraite, J., & Di Maria, C. (2016). Did the EU ETS make a difference? an empirical assessment using Lithuanian firm-level data. Energy Journal, 37 (1), 1–23.

Kallbekken, S., & Sælen, H. (2011). Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns. Energy Policy, 39 (5), 2966–2973.

Karapin, R. (2016). Political opportunities for climate policy: California, New York, and the federal government. Cambridge University Press.

Kaul, A., Kl ̈oßner, S., Pfeifer, G., & Schieler, M. (2022). Standard synthetic control methods: The case of using all preintervention outcomes together with covariates. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 40 (3), 1362–1376.

Maestre-Andres, S., Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. (2019). Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: A review of the literature. Climate Policy, 19 (9), 1186–1204.

Mastrandrea, M. D., Inman, M., & Cullenward, D. (2020). Assessing California’s progress toward its 2020 greenhouse gas emissions limit. Energy Policy, 138, 111219.

Mazmanian, D. A., Jurewitz, J. L., & Nelson, H. T. (2020). State leadership in US climate change and energy policy: The California experience. The Journal of Environment Development, 29 (1), 51–74.

Metcalf, G. E., & Stock, J. H. (2020). Measuring the macroeconomic impact of carbon taxes. Aea Papers and Proceedings, 110, 101–106.

Murray, B. C., & Maniloff, P. T. (2015). Why have greenhouse emissions in RGGI states declined? an econometric attribution to economic, energy market, and policy factors. Energy Economics, 51, 581–589.

Naegele, H., & Zaklan, A. (2019). Does the EU ETS cause carbon leakage in European manufacturing? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 125–147.

Pretis, F. (2022). Does a carbon tax reduce CO2 emissions? evidence from British Columbia. Environmental Resource Economics, 83 (1), 115–144.

Rafaty, R., Dolphin, G., & Pretis, F. (2020). Carbon pricing and the elasticity of CO2 emissions. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper.

Schaefer, S. (2019). Decoupling the EU ETS from subsidized renewables and other demand side effects: Lessons from the impact of the EU ETS on CO2 emissions in the German electricity sector. Energy Policy, 133.

Schmalensee, R., & Stavins, R. N. (2017). Lessons learned from three decades of experience with cap and trade. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11 (1), 59–79.

Stieglitz, J., & Stern, N. (2017). The report of the high-level commission on carbon prices (Report). World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, Washington, USA.

Tvinnereim, E., & Mehling, M. (2018). Carbon pricing and deep decarbonisation. Energy Policy, 121, 185–189.

Wara, M. (2014). California’s energy and climate policy: A full plate, but perhaps not a model policy. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 70 (5), 26–34.

World Bank. (2022). State and trends of carbon pricing 2022 (Report). World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, Washington, USA.

Yamazaki, A. (2017). Jobs and climate policy: Evidence from British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 83, 197–216.

Yan, J. C. (2021). The impact of climate policy on fossil fuel consumption: Evidence from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. Energy Economics, 100.

Zhang, H. J., Duan, M. S., & Deng, Z. (2019). Have China’s pilot emissions trading schemes promoted carbon emission reductions? the evidence from industrial sub-sectors at the provincial level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 912–924.

Zhang, W., Li, J., Li, G., & Guo, S. (2020). Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China. Energy, 196, 117117.