Answering the social discount rate question

Szekeres, Szabolcs (2022): Answering the social discount rate question.

Abstract

Discounting project net flows with prescriptive rates fails to reflect costs of capital; discounting them with descriptive rates fails to reflect intertemporal preferences. A two-rate discounting method is described by which a descriptive rate is used to forecast costs of capital and a prescriptive rate is used to discount the all-inclusive net benefit flow. Using this method is the equivalent of discounting with the social time preference rate (SPTR) after having adequately shadow-priced investments, which satisfies in full the requirements of both discounting approaches. It also results in an easy to apply rule: for projects to be economically feasible their IRR should exceed both the STPR and the social opportunity cost rate (SOCR). The long-standing social discount-rate dilemma is thus solved, for in fact there is no choice. Both rates must be used. An agent-based capital market model with multiple actors and two financial instruments, one of them stochastic, illustrates and provides additional insights.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: social discount rate; prescriptive discounting; descriptive discounting; two-rate discounting; declining discount rates; Ramsey rule
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis; H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents

References

Baumol, William J. (1968) “On the Social Rate of Discount”, American Economic Review, Volume 58, No. 4 (September 1968), https://www.jstor.org/stable/1815533

Becker, Gary, Kevin Murphy and Robert Topel. (2011). “On the Economics of Climate Policy.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. 10. 19-19. 10.2202/1935-1682.2854. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2854

Broughel, James (2020). “Accounting for the opportunity cost of capital in cost-benefit analysis: public interest comment on the marginal excess tax burden as a potential cost under Executive Order 13771.” Docket No. OMB-2017-0002. https://www.mercatus.org/publications/regulation/accounting-opportunity-cost-capital-cost-benefit-analysis-public-interest

Cline, W. R. (1992) “The Economics of Global Warming”, Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.Chichilnisky, Graciela. (1997). “What is Sustainable Development?” Land Economics 73, 467–491. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3147240

Freeman, Mark C. and Ben Groom, “Gamma Discounting and the Combination of Forecasts” (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1676793

Gandelman, Néstor and Rubén Hernáandez-Murillo (2014). “Risk Aversion at the Country Level,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2014/2014-005.pdf

Greaves, Hilary R. G. (2017) Discounting for public policy: A survey. Economics and Philosophy 33 (3):391-439, https://philarchive.org/archive/GREDFP-2 “Green Book:” HMT (2020). Guidelines on Cost-benefit Analysis. HM Treasury, UK, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/938046/The_Green_Book_2020.pdf

Groom, Ben, Cameron Hepburn, Phoebe Koundouri, and David Pearce (2005). “Declining Discount Rates: The Long and the Short of it.” Environ Resource Economics 32, 445–493 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-4681-y

Groom, Ben and Hepburn, Cameron. (2017) “Looking back at social discounting policy: The influence of papers, presentations, political preconditions, and personalities.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 11, (2) pp.336-356. ISSN 1750-6824. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1093/reep/rex015

Groom, Ben, Moritz A. Drupp, Mark C. Freeman, Frikk Nesje (2022) “The Future, Now: A Review of Social Discounting,” Annual Review of Resource Economics 2022 14:1 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-111920-020721

Harberger, A. C. (1972) Chapter 4 in Project Evaluation, collected papers of A. C. Harberger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Marglin, Stephen A. (1963) “The Opportunity Costs of Public Investment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, 1963, Vol. 77, No. 2 (May, 1963), pp. 274-289 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1884403

Nesje, Frikk and Drupp, Moritz A. and Freeman, Mark and Groom, Ben (2022). “Philosophers and Economists Can Agree on the Intergenerational Discount Rate and Climate Policy Paths” CESifo Working Paper No. 9930, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4219434

Newell R G, Pizer W A. 2003. “Discounting the distant future: how much do uncertain rates increase valuations?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(1):52–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00031-1

Nordhaus, William (2019). “Climate Change: The Ultimate Challenge for Economics.” American Economic Review, 2019, 109(6): 1991–2014, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.109.6.1991

OECD (2018), Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Further Developments and Policy Use, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085169-en.

Pigou, Arthur C. (1932). The Economics of Welfare, 4th edition. Macmillan, London

Rubinstein, Mark, (1976), “The Strong Case for the Generalized Logarithmic Utility Model as the Premier Model of Financial Markets,” Journal of Finance, 31, issue 2, p. 551-71, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb01906.x

Szekeres, Szabolcs (2020a) “Correcting the Error in Gamma Discounting.” MPRA Paper No. 102232, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/102232/

Szekeres, Szabolcs (2020b). “Checking the Evidence for Declining Discount Rates,” MPRA Paper No. 102233, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/102233/

Weitzman, Martin L. (1998). “Why the Far Distant Future Should Be Discounted at its Lowest Possible Rate”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1052