Hazans, Mihails and Pluta, Anna (2020): Tax incentives to encourage corporate investment in Latvia. Published in: New Challenges in Economic and Business Development - 2020: Economic Inequality and Well-Being (October 2020): pp. 160-173.
Preview |
PDF
Hazans_Pluta_Tax incentives.pdf Download (850kB) | Preview |
Abstract
During 2006 – 2017, Latvia applied a rather generous accelerated depreciation (AD) policy to stimulate firm investment. The AD policy included: (1) the general AD scheme, (2) incentives to acquire new technological equipment, and (3) Investment incentives in the specially assisted areas. This paper analyses the effect of accelerated depreciation policy on firm investment using administrative firm‐level data for 2007 – 2014. Lacking data for a natural experiment (AD began before our sample period), we use difference‐in-differences methodology with identification based on variation either across time (the crisis period serving as quasi‐counterfactual) or by firm size (with large firms unlikely to be genuinely affected by the policy). We find that past use of AD had a positive effect on firm investment rates. The effect is stronger in industries with most of their assets in long-duration categories and among enterprises with fewer than six employees. AD of new equipment has a significant effect both on next year's investment rate and on the probability of investing next year, but only for firms with six to ten workers.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Tax incentives to encourage corporate investment in Latvia |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | tax incentives, corporate investment, accelerated depreciation, difference‐in-differences |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D22 - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D92 - Intertemporal Firm Choice, Investment, Capacity, and Financing G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G31 - Capital Budgeting ; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies ; Capacity H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H25 - Business Taxes and Subsidies |
Item ID: | 118601 |
Depositing User: | Mihails Hazans |
Date Deposited: | 27 Sep 2023 04:42 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2023 04:42 |
References: | Bronzini R., de Blasio, G. Pellegrini, G. & Scognamiglio, A. (2008). “The Effect of Investment Tax Credit: Evidence from an Atypical Programme in Italy”, Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 661, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bdi:wptemi:td_661_08 Desai, M.A. & Goolsbee, A.D. (2004). “Investment, Overhang, and Tax Policy”. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 285 – 338. Devereux, M.P., Maffini, G. & Xing, J. (2016). “The Impact of Investment Incentives: Evidence from UK Corporation Tax Returns”. Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper Series, WP16/01. Edgerton, J. (2010). Investment Incentives and Corporate Tax Asymmetries. Journal of Public Economics, 94 (11-12): 936–952. Guceri, I. & Albinowski, M. (2021). “Investment Responses to Tax Policy under Uncertainty”. Journal of Financial Economics 141(3): 1147–1170. House, C.L. & Shapiro, M.D. (2008). “Temporary Investment Tax Incentives: Theory with Evidence from Bonus Depreciation”. American Economic Review, 98(3), 737–768. Jacobs, B., Sinnott, E., Skrok, E., Hazans, M., Mosberger, P., Pluta, A., Rastrigina, O. & Dillinger, W.R. (2017). Latvia Tax Review. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/587291508511990249/Latvia-tax-review Jorgenson, D. (1963). “Capital Theory and Investment Behavior”. American Economic Review, 53(2): 247–259. Kaplan, S.N. & Zingales, L. (1997). “Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide a Useful Measure of Financing Constraints?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1): 169–215. Masso, J. & Meriküll, J. (2011). “Macroeconomic effects of zero corporate income tax on retained earnings”. Baltic Journal of Economics, 11(1): 81–99. Mosberger, P., & Varga, Z. (2018). Aid Intensity and Firm Subsidiaries Reaction in Hungary. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Ohrn, E. (2018). “The Effect of Corporate Taxation on Investment and Financial Policy: Evidence from the DPAD”. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(2), 272 – 301. Ohrn, E. (2019). “The Effect of Tax Incentives on U.S. Manufacturing: Evidence from State Accelerated Depreciation Policies”. Journal of Public Economics, 180, Article Number 104084. Stein, J. C. (2003). “Agency, Information and Corporate Investment”. In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, and R. M. Stulz (eds.). Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, p. 111–165. Yagan, D. (2015). “Capital Tax Reform and the Real Economy: The Effects of the 2003 Dividend Tax Cut”. American Economic Review, 105(12):3531–3563. Zwick, E. & Mahon, J. (2017). “Tax Policy and Heterogeneous Investment Behavior”. American Economic Review, 107(1), 217–248. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/118601 |