On Equilibrium Number of Firms

Selim, Tarek (2006): On Equilibrium Number of Firms. Published in: Atlantic Economic Journal , Vol. 34, No. 4 (December 2006)

Abstract

This article provides a simple account of the effect of quality competition on the extent of sequential entry accommodation for a differentiated oligopoly market characterized by locational differentiation. The model is solved with consumers seeking a “love for quality” surplus utility while firms maximize economic profits constrained by their chosen level of quality location as endogenized within a given spectrum of locational quality differentiation. Initially, a duopoly market is considered, followed by successive market entry until a differentiated oligopoly market is completely saturated, or “fully covered”. Analysis of market concentration follows the sequential accommodation of market entry and is studied based on non-collusive industry-wide profitability using an augmented form of the Hirschman-Herfindahl concentration index. The level of available production technology is implicit in maximum quality location possible. In general, it is found that the degree of quality differentiation greatly affects the extent of market saturation and long run concentration. More differentiation asymmetry between firms deepens the marginal (negative) technological impact on long run concentration; with a less-than-proportionate change in the equilibrium number of firms. In the limit, several categories of behavior are studied, which imply a more competitive, less competitive, or “technology-neutral” market structure.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: market entry, market structure, equilibrium, number of firms, technology, market saturation, differentiation, quality location, brand competition
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics

References

Audretsch, D. and J. Zoltan. 1987. “Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 69, No. 4. (Nov., 1987), pp. 567-574.

Bain, J. 1972. Essays on Price Theory and Industrial Organization. Boston: Little, Brown.

Bain, J. 1951. “Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 65: 293-324.

Budd, C., C. Harris and J. Vickers. 1993. “A Model of Evolution of Duopoly: Does the Asymmetry between Firms Tend to Increase of Decrease?”. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 60, No. 3. (Jul., 1993), pp. 543-573.

Chamberlin, E. 1933. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Cowling, K., and M. Waterson. 1976. “Price-Cost Margins and Market Structure.” Economic Journal 43: 267-274.

Demsetz, H. 1973. “Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy.” Journal of Law and Economics 16: 1-10.

Dixit, A., and J. Stiglitz. 1977. “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity.” American Economic Review 67: 297-308.

Eaton, B. Curtis and Roger Ware. 1987. “A Theory of Market Structure with Sequential Entry.” The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1. (Spring, 1987), pp. 1-16.

Eaton, B., and S. Q. Lemche. 1991. “The Geometry of Supply, Demand, and Competitive Market Structure with Economies of Scope.” The American Economic Review, Vol. 81, No. 4. (Sep., 1991), pp. 901-911.

Eaton, B., and N. Schmitt. 1994. “Flexible Manufacturing and Market Structure.” The American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 4. (Sep., 1994), pp. 875-888.

Farrell, J., and C. Shapiro. 1990. “Asset Ownership and Market Structure in Oligopoly.” Symposium in Honor of Alvin K. Klevorick . The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, No. 2. (Summer, 1990), pp. 275-292.

Fishman, A., N. Gandal, and O. Shy. 1993. “Planned Obsolescence as an Engine of Technological Progress.” Journal of Industrial Economics 41: 361-370.

Gabszewicz, J., L. Pepall, and J. Thisse. 1992. “Sequential Entry with Brand Loyalty Caused by Consumer Learning-by-Using.” Journal of Industrial Economics 40: 397-416.

Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1957. “Market Structure and Stabilization Policy.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, No. 2. (May, 1957), pp. 124-133.

Geroski, P., R. Gilbert, and A. Jacquemin. 1990. Barriers to Entry and Strategic Competition. Switzerland: Hardwood Academic Publishers.

Hart, O. 1985. “Monopolistic Competition in the Spirit of Chamberlin: A General Model.” Review of Economic Studies 52: 529-546.

Hirschman, A. 1945. “The Paternity of an Index”. American Economic Review 54: 761-762.

Levhari, D., and Y. Peles. 1973. “Market Structure, Quality, and Durability”. Bell Journal of Economics 4: 235-248.

Nakao, T. 1982. “Product Quality and Market Structure.” The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 13, No. 1. (Spring, 1982), pp. 133-142.

Prescott, E., and M. Visscher. 1977. “Sequential Location among Firms with Foresight”. Bell Journal of Economics 8: 378-393.

Reinganum, Jennifer F. 1985. “Innovation and Industry Evolution.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 100, No. 1. (Feb., 1985), pp. 81-99.

Reinganum, J. F. 1984. “Practical Implications of Game Theoretic Models of R&D (in Microeconomics of Innovation and Productivity Growth).” The American Economic Review, Vol. 74, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. (May, 1984), pp. 61-66.

Reinganum, J. F. 1981. “Market Structure and the Diffusion of New Technology.” The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 12, No. 2. (Autumn, 1981), pp. 618-624.

Scherer, F. 1980. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. 2nd Edition. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

Schmalensee, R. 1986. “Inter-Industry Studies of Structure and Performance.” In Handbook of Industrial Organization, ed. R.

Schmalensee and R. Willig. Amsterdam: North Holland. Schmalensee, R. 1979. “Market Structure, Durability, and Quality”. Economic Inquiry 17: 177-196.

Shaked, A., and J. Sutton. 1990. “Multiproduct Firms and Market Structure.” The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1. (Spring, 1990), pp. 45-62.

Slade, M. 1991. “Market Structure, Marketing Method, and Price Instability.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, No. 4. (Nov., 1991), pp. 1309-1340.

Srinagesh, P., and R. Bradburd. 1989. “Quality Distortion by a Discriminating Monopolist.” American Economic Review 79: 96-105.

Spence, M. 1977. “Consumer Misperceptions, Product Failure, and Producer Liability.” Review of Economic Studies 44: 561-572.

Stoneman, P., and M. J. Kwon. 1996. “Technology Adoption and Firm Profitability.” The Economic Journal, Vol. 106, No. 437. (Jul., 1996), pp. 952-962.

Stoneman, P. 1990. “Technological Diffusion with Horizontal Product Differentiation and Adaptation Costs.” Economica, New Series, Vol. 57, No. 225. (Feb., 1990), pp. 49-61.

Stoneman, P., and N. J. Ireland. 1983. “The Role of Supply Factors in the Diffusion of New Process Technology.” The Economic Journal, Vol. 93, Supplement: Conference Papers. (1983), pp. 66-78.

Tirole, J. 1996. “A Theory of Collective Reputations (with Applications to the Persistence of Corruption and to Firm Quality).” Review of Economic Studies 63: 1-22.

Vany, A., and T. Saving. 1983. “The Economics of Quality.” Journal of Political Economy 91: 979-1000. John Vickers. 1986. “The Evolution of Market Structure when There is a Sequence of Innovations.” Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 35, No. 1. (Sep., 1986), pp. 1-12.

Weinstock, D. 1982. “Using the Herfindahl Index to Measure Concentration.” Antitrust Bulletin 27: 285-301.

Weizsacher, V. 1980. “A Welfare Analysis of Barriers to Entry.” RAND Journal of Economics 11: 399-420.