Effects of Institutional Setting on Value Estimates of Stated Preference Surveys in Developing Economies: A Discrete Choice Experiment on Conserving Biodiversity in The Cape Floristic Region

Manhique, Henrique and Wätzold, Frank (2023): Effects of Institutional Setting on Value Estimates of Stated Preference Surveys in Developing Economies: A Discrete Choice Experiment on Conserving Biodiversity in The Cape Floristic Region.

Abstract

The use of stated preference surveys for the valuation of environmental goods in developing countries has to take into account that there is substantial public distrust towards the institutions providing the environmental goods under valuation. Thus, high protest responses and low value estimates may indicate rejection or protest against the institutional setting of the survey design, rather than the dislike or low welfare effects of these goods. In this context, we investigate the effects of institutional trust on value estimates by examining the performance of three different institutions – government, conservation NGO, and farmers – in a case study aimed at eliciting preferences for conserving different types of biodiversity within orchards in the Cape Floristic Region – a biodiversity hotspot in South Africa threatened by the expansion and intensification of agriculture. We find that institutional trust has an effect on preferences and willingness-to-pay, with farmers leading to the highest level of trust and value estimates, followed rather closely by a conservation NGO and, with some distance, by the government with the lowest trust level and value estimates. In terms of preferences for biodiversity conservation, our results show that respondents prefer measures to conserve endangered and endemic species over measures primarily aimed at providing the ecosystem services of pollination and pest control.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Biodiversity Hotspot; Institutional distrust; Ecosystem services; Economics; Endangered species; Payment vehicle; Western Cape
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology

References

Abramson A, Becker N, Garb Y, Lazarovitch N (2011) Willingness to pay, borrow, and work for rural water service improvements in developing countries. Water Resour. Res. 47. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010147

Arvidsson F, Addison P, Addison M, Haddad CR, Birkhofer K (2020) Weed species, not mulching, affect web‐building spiders and their prey in organic fruit orchards in South Africa. Ecosphere 11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3059

Birkhofer K, Addison MF, Arvidsson F, Bazelet C, Bengtsson J, Booysen R, Des Conlong, Haddad C, Janion-Scheepers C, Kapp C, Lindborg R, Louw S, Malan AP, Storey SG, Swart WJ, Addison P (2019) Effects of Ground Cover Management on Biotic Communities, Ecosystem Services and Disservices in Organic Deciduous Fruit Orchards in South Africa. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00107

Birol E, Das S (2012) Valuing the environment in developing countries: modelling the impact of distrust in public authorities' ability to deliver public services on the citizens' willingness to pay for improved environmental quality. Urban Water Journal 9:249–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2012.660958

Bliemer MC, Collins AT (2016) On determining priors for the generation of efficient stated choice experimental designs. Journal of Choice Modelling 21:10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2016.03.001

Campos P, Caparrós A, Oviedo JL (2007) Comparing Payment-Vehicle Effects in Contingent Valuation Studies for Recreational Use in Two Protected Spanish Forests. Journal of Leisure Research 39:60–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2007.11950098

Carson RT, Groves T (2007) Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environ Resource Econ 37:181–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5

Chen WY, Hua J (2015) Citizens' distrust of government and their protest responses in a contingent valuation study of urban heritage trees in Guangzhou, China. J Environ Manage 155:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.002

Cooper B, Rose J, Crase L (2012) Does anybody like water restrictions? Some observations in Australian urban communities*. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 56:61–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00573.x

Cowling RM, Rundel PW, Lamont BB, Kalin Arroyo M, Arianoutsou M (1996) Plant diversity in mediterranean-climate regions. Trends Ecol Evol 11:362–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)10044-6

DALRRD (2020) A profile of the south african apple market value chain 2020. http://www.dalrrd.gov.za. Accessed 12 November 2022

Gaigher R, Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2015) High parasitoid diversity in remnant natural vegetation, but limited spillover into the agricultural matrix in South African vineyard agroecosystems. Biological Conservation 186:69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.003

Greeff P, Kotzé M (2007) Subsector study: Deciduous fruit. Report, no. 2007-02. National Agricultural Marketing Council, Pretoria

Greene WH (2012) Econometric analysis. Pearson Addison Wesley, Harlow, New York

Greene WH, Hensher DA (2007) Heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components in mixed logit. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 43:610–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2006.02.001

Hassan S, Olsen SB, Thorsen BJ (2018) Appropriate Payment Vehicles in Stated Preference Studies in Developing Economies. Environ Resource Econ 71:1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0196-6

Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH (2015) Applied Choice Analysis. Cambridge University Press

Hortgro (2019) Key deciduous fruit statistics 2019. https://www.hortgro.co.za. Accessed 15 February 2023

Jacobsen JB, Lundhede TH, Thorsen BJ (2012) Valuation of wildlife populations above survival. Biodivers Conserv 21:543–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0200-3

Johnston RJ, Boyle KJ, Adamowicz W, Bennett J, Brouwer R, Cameron TA, Hanemann WM, Hanley N, Ryan M, Scarpa R, Tourangeau R, Vossler CA (2017) Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4:319–405. https://doi.org/10.1086/691697

Kassahun HT, Nicholson CF, Jacobsen JB, Steenhuis TS (2016) Accounting for user expectations in the valuation of reliable irrigation water access in the Ethiopian highlands. Agricultural Water Management 168:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.017

Kassahun HT, Jacobsen JB, Nicholson CF (2020) Revisiting money and labor for valuing environmental goods and services in developing countries. Ecological Economics 177:106771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106771

Kassahun HT, Swait J, Jacobsen JB (2021) Distortions in willingness-to-pay for public goods induced by endemic distrust in institutions. Journal of Choice Modelling 39:100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100271

Manning J, Goldblatt P (eds) (2012) Plants of the Greater Cape Floristic Region. Strelitzia, vol 29. SANBI Biodiversity for Life, Pretoria Manrakhan A, Addison P (2014) Assessment of fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) management practices in deciduous fruit growing areas in South Africa. Pest Manag Sci 70:651–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3604

Mariel P, Hoyos D, Meyerhoff J, Czajkowski M, Dekker T, Glenk K, Jacobsen JB, Liebe U, Olsen SB, Sagebiel J, Thiene M (2021) Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments. Springer International Publishing, Cham

McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New York, pp 105–142

McFadden D, Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econ. 15:447–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447:AID-JAE570>3.0.CO;2-1

Meginnis K, Hanley N, Mujumbusi L, Lamberton PHL (2020) Non-monetary numeraires: Varying the payment vehicle in a choice experiment for health interventions in Uganda. Ecological Economics 170:106569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106569

Moreaux C, Jacobsen JB, Meyerhoff J, Dalsgaard B, Rahbek C, Strange N (2023) Distance and Regional Effects on the Value of Wild Bee Conservation. Environ Resource Econ 84:37–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00692-z

Morrison MD, Blamey RK, Bennett JW (2000) Minimising Payment Vehicle Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies. Environ Resource Econ 16:407–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008368611972

Mwebaze P, Marris GC, Brown M, MacLeod A, Jones G, Budge GE (2018) Measuring public perception and preferences for ecosystem services: A case study of bee pollination in the UK. Land Use Policy 71:355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.045

Nthambi M, Markova-Nenova N, Wätzold F (2021) Quantifying Loss of Benefits from Poor Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Projects: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Farmers in Kenya. Ecological Economics 179:106831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106831

Oehlmann M, Meyerhoff J (2017) Stated preferences towards renewable energy alternatives in Germany – do the consequentiality of the survey and trust in institutions matter? Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2016.1139468

Oh H, Hong JH (2012) Citizens’ trust in government and their willingness-to-pay. Economics Letters 115:345–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.010

Ratto F, Steward P, Sait SM, Pryke JS, Gaigher R, Samways MJ, Kunin W (2021) Proximity to natural habitat and flower plantings increases insect populations and pollination services in South African apple orchards. Journal of Applied Ecology 58:2540–2551. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13984

Remoundou K, Kountouris Y, Koundouri P (2012) Is the value of an environmental public good sensitive to the providing institution? Resource and Energy Economics 34:381–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.03.002

Revelt D, Train K (1998) Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level. Review of Economics and Statistics 80:647–657. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557735

Rose JM, Bain S, Bliemer,Michiel,C.,J. (2011) Experimental design strategies for stated preference studies dealing with non-market goods. In: Bennett J (ed) The international handbook on non-market environmental valuation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K., pp 273–299

Rouget M, Richardson DM, Cowling RM, Lloyd J, Lombard AT (2003) Current patterns of habitat transformation and future threats to biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biological Conservation 112:63–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00395-6

Theron KJ, Gaigher R, Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2020) Abandoned fields and high plant diversity support high spider diversity within an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity hotspot. Biodivers Conserv 29:3757–3782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02048-9

Train KE (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press

van Schalkwyk J, Pryke JS, Samways MJ, Gaigher R (2020) Spillover of terrestrial arthropod species and beta diversity in perennial crops relative to spatial scale of land‐use intensity. Journal of Applied Ecology 57:1469–1481. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13638

Vedel SE, Jacobsen JB, Thorsen BJ (2015) Forest owners' willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality. Ecological Economics 113:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.014

Vossler CA, Doyon M, Rondeau D (2012) Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4:145–171. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.4.4.145

Wätzold F, Lienhoop N, Drechsler M, Settele J (2008) Estimating optimal conservation in the context of agri-environmental schemes. Ecological Economics 68:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.007

Welling M, Dehnhardt A, Aß S-M (2023) Does validity matter for policymakers? Evidence from choice experiments on urban green. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2023.2186954

Whittington D, Pagiola S (2012) Using Contingent Valuation in the Design of Payments for Environmental Services Mechanisms: A Review and Assessment. The World Bank Research Observer 27:261–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lks004

Zawojska E, Bartczak A, Czajkowski M (2019) Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 93:63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.11.007