de la Fonteijne, Marcel R. (2023): The Consequence of the Modern Universal Growth Theory (MUGT) with respect to homogeneous degree 1 CES functions.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_118888.pdf Download (657kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In 2018 we adapted the implementation of technical growth to correct the Solow growth model. Within this article, we delve into some of the consequential aspects of this Modern Universal Growth Theory (MUGT) with respect to homogeneous degree 1 CES production functions. In particular, we demonstrate, that the well known Cobb Douglas and CES production functions can serve as the fi rst and second order approximation of any arbitrary production function, respectively. Furthermore, contrary to what you can find in literature, we show that technical progress in the MUGT is always labor saving. Also interesting is the point that even a negative elasticity of substitution is allowed.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Consequence of the Modern Universal Growth Theory (MUGT) with respect to homogeneous degree 1 CES functions |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Capital and Labor Augmented Technical Progress, Growth Model, Maximum Profit Condition; Production Functions; General Technological Progress; Capital-Labor-mix; Estimation of the Elasticity of Substitution; DSGE; Total Factor Productivity; Solow model; Hicks; Harrod; Labor Saving |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E00 - General E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E20 - General E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E23 - Production E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity |
Item ID: | 118888 |
Depositing User: | Marcel R. de la Fonteijne |
Date Deposited: | 26 Oct 2023 04:53 |
Last Modified: | 26 Oct 2023 04:54 |
References: | De la Fonteijne, Marcel R., 2018, Why the Concept of Hicks, Harrod, Solow Neutral and even Non-Neutral Augmented Technical Progress is flawed, MPRA, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/107730/ |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/118888 |