Передача знаний и трансформация мезоединиц: роль сетевых взаимодействий на мезотраектории развития экономической системы

Golichenko, Oleg (2023): Передача знаний и трансформация мезоединиц: роль сетевых взаимодействий на мезотраектории развития экономической системы. Published in:

Abstract

The study is devoted to the analysis of the processes of transfer and transformation of technological knowledge and their carriers on the mesotrajectory of innovative development. At the same time, the mesounit (population - technological rule) is considered as a connected network set that combines the tangible and intangible assets of actors, their dynamic abilities and social ties. In studying network interactions, the work is essentially based on the sociological theory of networks, the logic of which is that networks of interactions (tangible and intangible ties) of actors can arise not only when economic ties are already embedded in social ties, but also much earlier, when they are still absent. Networks are studied in relation to the phases of the trajectory and considered from the point of view of achieving the goals of actors at these phases. It is shown that each phase realizes its own paradigm of network development: dynamic in the first phase of the trajectory, organic in the second and mechanical in the third. The examples of (inter)action of networks in each of these phases are given

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Transfer of Knowledge and Transformation of Mesounits: the Role of Network Interactions on the Mesotrajectories of the Development of the Economic System
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: knowledge transferability, explicit and implicit knowledge, communicative interactions, meso-unit transformation networks, mesotrajectory phases.
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy

References

1. Dopfer, K., Foster, J. and J. Potts. Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 14, 2004, pp. 263–279.

2. Dopfer, K. and J. Potts. The General Theory of Economic Evolution. Routledge, London, 2008.

3. Dopfer, K. The origins of meso economics Schumpeter’s legacy and beyond. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 22, N 1, 2012, pp.133-160

4. Dopfer, K., Potts, J., and A. Pyka. Upward and Downward Complementarity: The Meso Core of Evolutionary Growth Theory. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2015.

5. Cowan, R., David, P. A., and Foray, D. The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 9, 2000, pp. 211–253.

6. Polanyi, M. Personal Knowledge—Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.

7. Szulanski, G. Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice with the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, 1996, pp. 27–34.

8. Boisot, M. H. Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy, Oxford: Oxford University, 1998.

9. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, Vol. 35, No. 1, Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation, pp. 128-152.

10. Powell W.W. and Grodal S. Networks of Innovators. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, and R. Nelson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

11. Granovetter, M. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1993, Vol. 78, N6, pp. 1360–1380.

12. Burt, R. S. Structural Holes, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992.

13. Ahuja, G. Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study, Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, Vol. 45, pp. 425–455.

14. Powell W.W. and Grodal S. Networks of Innovators. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, and R. Nelson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

15. Håkansson H. and I. Snethota (eds.). Developing Relationships in Business Networks, London, 1995.

16. Hakansson, H. and Ford, D. How Should Companies Interact in Business Networks. Journal of Business Research, 2002, Vol. 55, pp. 133-139.

17. Penrose, E. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1959.

18. Teece, D., and Pisano, G. The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1994, Vol, 3, pp. 537–556.

19. Coenen L. Comparing Systems Approaches to Innovation and Technological change for Sustainable and Competitive Economies: an Explorative Study into Conceptual Commonalities, Differences and Complementarities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, Vol. 18, N 12, pp. 1149-1160.

20. Musiolik J, Markard J, Hekkert M. (2012) Networks and Network Resources in Technological Innovation Systems: Towards a Conceptual Framework for System Building. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2012, Vol. 79, pp.1032–1048.

21. Carlsson, B., Stankiewicz, R. On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1991, Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp, 93-118.

22. Geels, F.W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems Research Policy, Vol 33, 2004, pp. 897–920.

23. Geels F.W. and S. Schot. Typology of Socio-Technical Transition Pathways. Research Policy, Vol. 36, 2007, pp. 399–417.

24. Geels. F. W. Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy,Vol. 39, 2010, pp.495-510.

25. Callon, M. (1998), “Actor-Network Theory—The Market Test,” in J. Law and J. Hassard (eds.), Actor Network Theory and After, Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1998, pp.186–196.

26. Golichenko O.G. Problemy regulirovaniya mezotraektorij v nacional'noj innovacionnoj sisteme. Drukerovskij vestnik. 2018, № 4.

27. Golichenko O. Meso Trajectories in the National Innovation System and Their Regulation. In: Zhang T., (Ed.), Circular Economy - Recent Advances, New Perspectives and Applications. IntechOpen, London, 2021, pp.39-59.

28. Lundvall, B.-Å. National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Anthem Press. 2010.

29. Powell, W. W., Packalen, K., and Whittington, K. Organisational and Institutional genesis: The Emergence of High-tech Clusters in the Life-sciences in Padget. In W. Powell (Ed.), The Emergence of Organizations and Markets. Princeton University Press, 2010.

30. Hagedoorn, J., Duysters, G. Learning in Dynamic Inter-firm Networks: The Efficacy of Multiple Contacts. Organization Studies, 2002, Vol.23, N4, 525–548.

31. Koh, F. C. C., Koh, W. T. H., & Tschang, F. T. Analytical Framework for Science parks and Technology Districts with an Application to Singapore. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005, Vol. 20, 217–239.

32. Boehm, D., Hogan, T. Science-to-Business collaborations: A science-to-business marketing perspective on scientific knowledge commercialization. Industrial Marketing Management, 2013, 42, N4, 564–579.

33. Powell, W. W., Sandholtz, K. W. (2012). Amphibious Entrepreneurs and the Emergence of Organizational forms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2012, Vol. 6, N2, pp. 94–115.

34. Malerba, F., Nelson, R. R. Economic Development as a Learning Process: Variation across Sectoral Systems. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012.

35. Dattee, B., Alexy, O., and Autio, E. Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, 2018, Vol.61, N2, pp. 466–498.

36. Möller, K., Svahn, S. How to Influence the Birth of new Business Fields—Network perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 2009, Vol. 38, N4, pp. 450–458.

37. Möller, K. Sense-making and Agenda Construction in Emerging Business Networks – How to Direct Radical Innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 2010, Vol. 29, pp. 361–371.

38. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., Natti, S. Orchestrator Types, Roles and Capabilities – A Framework for Innovation Networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 2018, Vol.74, pp. 65–78.

39. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982.

40. Fleming L. and Sorenson O. Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 2001, Vol. 30, issue 7, 1019-1039.

41. Golichenko O.G. Mekhanizmy i motory razvitiya mezotraektorij mnogourov-nevnoj mnogourovnevyh sistem. Drukerovskij vestnik, 2022. № 5, S. 4-23

42. Amin, A., & Cohendet, P. Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2004.

43. Maurer, I., & Ebers, M. (2006). Dynamics of Social Capital and Their Performance Implications: Lessons from Biotechnology Start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2006, Vol. 50, N2, pp. 262−293.

44. Mitrega, M., Forkmann, S., Ramos, C., and Henneberg, S. C. (2012). Networking Capability in Business Relationships—Concept and Scale Development. Industrial Marketing Management, 2012, Vol. 41, pp. 739–751.

45. Aarikka-Stenrondos, L., Sandberg, B. From New-product Development to Commercialization through Networks. Journal of Business Research, 2012, Vol.65, 198–206.

46. Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Sandberg, B. and Lehtimaki, T. Networks for the Commercialization of Innovations: A Review of How Divergent Network Actors Contribute. Industrial Marketing Management, 2014, Vol.43, N3, 365–381.

47. Koh, F. C. C., Koh, W. T. H., & Tschang, F. T. An analytical framework for science parks and technology districts with an application to Singapore. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005, Vol. 20, 217–239.

48. Möller, K., and Rajala, A. Rise of strategic nets – New modes of value creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 2007, Vol.36, N7, 895–908.

49. Ranganathan, R., & Rosenkopf, L. Do ties really bind? The effect of knowledge and communication networks on opposition to standards. Academy of Management Journal, 2014,Vol, 57, pp. 515–540.

50. Pöyhönen, A. and Smedlund, A. Assessing intellectual capital creation in regional clusters, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2004, Vol. 5, No 3, pp. 351-365

51. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.31, N3, 306–333.

52. Leiponen, A. (2008). Control of intellectual assets in client relationships: Implications for innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1371–1394

53. Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., and Rangaswamy, A. The Emergence of Dominant Designs. Journal of Marketing, 2006, Vol. 70, pp. 1–17.

54. Sydow, J., Müller-Seitz, G. Open innovation at the interorganizational network level – Stretching practices to face technological discontinuities in the semiconductor industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, Vol, 155, pp. 119-198.

55. Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen F., Zhelyazkov P.I. The Two Facets of Collaboration: Cooperation and Coordination in Strategic Alliances. The Academy of Management Annals, 2012, Vol. 6, N1, pp. 1-53.

56. Ansari, S., Reinecke, J., and Spaan, A. How Are Practices Made to Vary? Managing Practice Adaptation in a Multinational Corporation. Organization Studies, 2014, Vol 35, N 9, pp. 1313–1341.

57. Merkus, S., Willems, T., and Veenswijk, M. Strategy Implementation as Performative Practice: Reshaping Organization into Alignment with Strategy. Organization Management Journal, 2019, Vol.16, N3, 140–155.

58. Miterev, M., Jerbrant, A., & Feldmann, A. (2020). Exploring the alignment between organization designs and value processes over the program lifecycle. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 38, N2, 112–123.

59. Perks, H., Kowalkowski, C., Witell, L. and Gustafsson, A. Network Orchestration for Value Platform Development. Industrial Marketing Management, 2017, Vol. 67, 106–1121

60. Reypens, C., Lievens, A. and Blazevic, V. Hybrid Orchestration in Multi-stakeholder Innovation Networks: Practices of Mobilizing Multiple, Diverse Stakeholders Across Organizational Boundaries. Organization Studies, 2021, Vol, 42, N1, pp. 61–83.

61. Wang, Y., Phillips, F. and Yang, C. Bridging Innovation and Commercialization to Create Value: An Open Innovation Study. Journal of Business Research, 2021, Vol.123, pp. 255–266.

62. Nooteboom, B. Inter-Firm Alliances. Analysis and Design, Routledge, London, 1999.