Взаимосвязь факторов инновационной деятельности на примере регионов РФ

Golichenko, Oleg and Balycheva, Yulia (2023): Взаимосвязь факторов инновационной деятельности на примере регионов РФ. Published in:

Abstract

The paper investigates the relationship between the factors of innovation activity, which determine to the greatest extent the scale of innovation product diffusion in regional markets. These factors are identified based on the training of linear regression and random forest models, for which the data of the Federal State Statistics Service for the period from 2000 to 2020 are used. Different ratios of factors allow us to identify innovative strategies and the regions most committed to them. In addition, the paper conducts trajectories of the regions' movement depending on the dynamics of the factors' change over time. It also considers the mutual influence of the highlighted main indicators on other characteristics of the innovation process at the regional level.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Interrelation of innovation activity factors on the example of Russian regions
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: innovation, innovation process, innovation trajectory
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy

References

1. Afanas'ev M. YU., Kudrov A.V., Lysenkova M.A. (2020) Sravnenie indeksov innovacionnogo razvitiya v prostranstve harakteristik regional'noj differenciacii. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta inzhenernyh tekhnologij. 2020. Vol. 82, No. 4(86). pp. 340-346. (In Russ.)

2. Balycheva YU.E. (2023) Analiz rezul'tativnosti innovacionnoj deyatel'nosti rossijskih regionov na osnove regressionnogo analiza. Sekciya 1 «Teoreticheskie problemy strategicheskogo planirovaniya» Strategicheskoe planirovanie i razvitie predpriyatij: materialy HKHIV Vserossijskogo simpoziuma. Moskva, 11–12 aprelya 2023 g. / pod red. chl.-korr. RAN G.B. Klejnera. M.: CEMI RAN, pp. 4-6. (In Russ.)

3. Golichenko O. G., Balycheva YU. E. (2013) Stabil'nost' i variativnost' patentnoj aktivnosti rossijskih predpriyatij v regional'nom razreze. Innovacii. No. 5(175), pp. 87-92. (In Russ.)

4. Mezoekonomika Rossii: strategiya razbega / G. B. Klejner; Federal'noe gosudarstvennoe byudzhetnoe uchrezhdenie nauki Central'nyj ekonomiko-matematicheskij institut RAN. Moskva : Izdatel'skij dom "Nauchnaya biblioteka", 2022. 808 p. (In Russ.)

5. Nizhegorodcev R. M., Arhipova M. YU. (2009) Faktory ekonomicheskogo rosta rossijskih regionov: regressionno-klasternyj analiz. Vestnik UGTU-UPI. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie. No. 3, pp. 94-110. (In Russ.)

6. Nikonova M. A. (2019) Innovacionnaya aktivnost' v regionah Rossii. Federalizm, no. 2(94). (In Russ.)

7. Samovoleva S. A., Balycheva YU. E. (2020) Harakteristiki kachestva innovacionnogo processa i absorbciya zarubezhnyh znanij. Innovacii. No. 6(260), pp. 69-79. (In Russ.)

8. Samovoleva S. A. (2021) Eksport innovacij i absorbciya zarubezhnyh tekhnologicheskih znanij. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. Vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 21-33. (In Russ.)

9. Balycheva Y. (2021) Absorptive capacity and innovative behaviour: Evidence from russian manufacturing firms / Y. Balycheva, S. Samovoleva. Proceedings of the European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, ECIE : 16th, Virtual, Online, pp. 62-70. (In Russ.)

10. Clark G.L., Feldman M.P., Gertler M.S., Wo ́jcik D. (2018) The New Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford University Press.

11. Cooke P. (2001) Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Ind. Corp. Chang. 10, pp.945–974.

12. Delvenne P., Thoreau F. (2017) Dancing without listening to the music: learning from some failures of the ‘national innovation systems’ in Latin America. In: Kuhlmann, Stefan, Ordon ̃ez-Matamoros, G. (Eds.), Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies: Towards Better Models. Edward Elgar Pub, Northampton, MA, pp. 37–58.

13. Dutrenit G., Puchet M. (2017) Tensions of STI policy in Mexico:analytical models, institutional evolution, national capabilities and governance. In: Kuhlmann, Stefan, Ordo ́n ̃ez-Matomoros, G. (Eds.), International Research Handbook on Science, Technology And Innovation Policy in Developing Countries: Rationales And Relevance. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.

14. Frahm N., Doezema T., Pfotenhauer S.M. (2021) Fixing technology with society: the coproduction of democratic deficits and responsible innovation at the OECD and the European Commission. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 47, pp.174–216.

15. Haddad C., Benner M. (2021) Situating innovation policy in Mediterranean Arab countries: a research agenda for context sensitivity. Res. Policy 50, 104273

16. Pfotenhauer S.M., Juhl J., Aarden E. (2019) Challenging the “deficit model” of innovation: Framing policy issues under the innovationimperative. Res. Policy 48, pp.895–904.