The Egyptian Revolution as a Non-Cooperative Game of Conflict

Selim, Tarek and Ezzeldin, Ahmed (2013): The Egyptian Revolution as a Non-Cooperative Game of Conflict. Published in: POLITSCI '13: Theorizing and Experiencing Politics, Istanbul, Turkey (November 2013)

Abstract

In this paper, the ongoing subjective debate on the role of different players in the Egyptian revolution is assessed using Fraser Hipel technique for analyzing political conflicts. This analysis will open the door for an objective investigation of the conflict behind the Egyptian revolution. After 18 days of protests, the Egyptian protestors celebrated Mubarak’s resignation, and the Supreme Council of Armed Forces (SCAF) led the transitional period. However, the series of confrontations between SCAF and civil opposition have ignited an intense debate about the role of different players in the revolution. Still, most of these debates are based on subjective records and personal opinions. This paper will analyze the Egyptian revolution as a non-cooperative game using Fraser-Hipel technique to reach to a more objective understanding of the revolution. Fraser-Hipel Technique extends the notion of Nash equilibrium to apply it to different political conflicts. Due to the lack of objective records of the revolution, the ongoing debates are modeled into six scenarios to determine which ones can lead to the revolution outcome from a strategic perspective. In addition, the role of different players in realizing the outcome will be assessed. Among the core conclusions, the analysis negates the notion that Mubarak’s resignation was achieved through a coup d’état rather than a popular revolution. In addition, the possibility of a neutral stand of SCAF during the revolution is supported by this analysis.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Conflict resolution, Egypt revolution, Non-cooperative game, Fraser-Hipel technique, political economy
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games; H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government; H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H12 - Crisis Management

References

Abdelhadi, M. (2011). Egypt army’s helped oust President Mubarak. BBC News Middle East. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12514316. [Accessed: 23rd April 2013].

Abdel Baki, M. and Mahmoud, K. (2011). Administrator of Sorry Mr. President Movement: Mubarak protected the revolution. El Fagr. [Online]. 10th June. Available from: http://new.elfagr.org//Detail.aspx?nwsId=65188&secid=1&vid=2#. [Accessed: 10th May 2013].

Abou El Gheit, A. (2013) My Testimony (Arabic). Cairo: Dar Nahdet Misr.

Abou Taleb, H. (2011) The Egyptian Army and The Revolution. Al Ahram [Online]. 11th March. Available from: http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContentP/4/7418/Opinion/The-Egyptian-army-and-therevolution. aspx. [Accessed: 23rd April 2013].

Bakri, M. ( 2011) The Military and the Revolution: The Story of the Final Days (Arabic). Cairo: Akhbar Al- Youm Publishing House.

Beaumont, P. and Shenker, J. (2011). Egyptian army disperses Mubarak supporters from bridge. Guardian. [Online]. 2nd February. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/03/egyptian-army-disperses-mubarak-supporters. [Accessed: 20th April 2013].

Borger, J. and Ball, J. (2011) WikiLeaks cables: Egyptian military head is 'old and resistant to change. The Guardian [Online]. 14th February. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20110307153819/http:/www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/14/wikileaks -cables-egyptian-military-head. [Accessed: 23rd April 2013].

Dixit, A. K., Susan S., and David R. Games of Strategy. New York: W. W. Norton &, 2009.

El-Menawy, A. ( 2012) Tahrir: The Last 18 Days of Mubarak. UK: Gilgamesh Publishing.

Fisher, M. (2011). Contemporary Challenges: Life After Mubarak. Wikileaks. Available at: http://www.wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/309308_re-for-comment-conclusion-to-egypt-monographcontemporary. html. [Accessed: 23rd April 2013].

Fraser, N.M. , and Hipel K. W. (1979a). Solving complex conflicts. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 9 (12). p. 805-816.

Fraser, N.M., Hipel, K.W., Jaworsky, J., & Zuljan, R. (1990). A conflict analysis of the Armenian-Azerbaijani dispute. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 34 (4). p. 652-677.

Fraser, N.M., Hipe, K.W., Wang M. (1988). Hypergame analysis of the Falkland/Malvinas conflict. International Studies Quarterly. 32(3). p. 335-358.

Hauslohner, A. (2011). The Army's OK with the Protesters, for now. Time. [Online]. 29th January. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20110131222033/http:/www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,204512 4,00.html. [Accessed: 23rd April 2013].

Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kenner, D. (2013). Egyptian Revolution through Mubarak’s eyes. The Peninsula. [Online].30th January. Available from: http://thepeninsulaqatar.com/political-views/223836-egyptian-revolution-throughmubarak% E2%80%99s-eyes.html. [Accessed: 10th May 2013].

Meleskie, M.F., Hipel K.W., and Fraser N.M. (1982). The Watergate tapes conflict: A metagame analysis. Political Methodology. 8. p.1-23.

Nash, j. (1951). Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics. 54. p.286-295.

O’Donnell, G. and Schmitter, P. ( 1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Rasmusen,E. (2007) Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Sallam, H. (2013). Symposium: Teaching about the Middle East since the Arab uprisings. Georgetown University, April 2013.

Shupe, M.C., Wright, W., Hipel, K., & Fraser, N.(1980). Nationalization of the Suez Canal. TheJournal of Conflict Resolution. 24. p.477-493.

Steavenson, W. (2011). Who Owns the Revolution?. The New Yorker [Online]. 1st Aug. Available From: http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA263085561&v=2.1&u=aucairo&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w. [Accessed at: 20th April 2013]

Stein, E. (2012). Revolution or Coup? Egypt's Fraught Transition. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy. 54(4). p. 45-66.

World Tribune [Online] (2011). Mubarak plays last card, the army; Police vanish. 31st January. Available from:http://web.archive.org/web/20110203004542/http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTA RC/2011/me_egypt0078_01_31.asp. [Accessed: 23rd April 2013].

Zagare, F.C. (1986). Recent advances in Game Theory and Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science. p.60-90