Political Fragmentation versus a Unified Empire in a Malthusian Economy

Chu, Angus and Peretto, Pietro and Furukawa, Yuichi (2023): Political Fragmentation versus a Unified Empire in a Malthusian Economy. Forthcoming in: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Abstract

What are the historical origins of political fragmentation and unification? This study develops a Malthusian growth model with multiple states to explore interstate competition and the endogenous emergence of political fragmentation versus a unified empire. Our model features an agricultural society with citizens and rulers in a Malthusian environment in which the expansion of one state may come at the expense of another state, depending on the intensity of interstate competition captured by the elasticity of the land ratio with respect to the population ratio between states. If this elasticity is less than unity, then multiple states coexist. However, if this elasticity is equal to unity, then a unified empire emerges. Which state becomes the unified empire depends on its military power, agricultural productivity, and its rulers' preference for rent-seeking Leviathan taxation. We also discuss the historical relevance of these theoretical predictions in the Warring States period of ancient China.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Interstate competition; unified empire; Malthusian growth theory
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H56 - National Security and War; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity

References

Alesina, A., and Spolaore, E., 2003. The Size of Nations. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Alesina, A., and Spolaore, E., 2005. War, peace, and the size of countries. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1333-1354.

Ashraf, Q., and Galor, O., 2011. Dynamics and stagnation in the Malthusian epoch. American Economic Review, 101, 2003-2041.

Bello, D., 2020. Environmental change and Chinese empire. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History. Published online: 28 February 2020.

Brander, J. A., and Taylor, M. S., 1998. The simple economics of Easter Island: A Ricardo-Malthus model of renewable resource use. American Economic Review, 88, 119-138.

Chaudhry, A., and Garner, P., 2006. Political competition between countries and economic growth. Review of Development Economics, 10, 666-682.

Chu, A., 2010. Nation states vs. united empire: Effects of political competition on economic growth. Public Choice, 145, 181-195.

Chu, A., 2023. Natural selection and Neanderthal extinction in a Malthusian economy. Journal of Population Economics, 36, 1641-1656.

Chu, A., Peretto, P., and Wang, X., 2022. Agricultural revolution and industrialization. Journal of Development Economics, 158, 102887.

Chu, A., and Xu, R., 2024. From Neolithic Revolution to Industrialization. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 28, 699-717.

de la Croix, D., and Dottori, D., 2008. Easter Island's collapse: A tale of a population race. Journal of Economic Growth, 13, 27-55.

Diamond, J. 1997. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W.W. Norton.

Eggert, W., Itaya, J., and Mino, K., 2011. A dynamic model of conflict and appropriation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 78, 167-182.

Fernandez-Villaverde, J., Koyama, M., Lin, Y., and Sng, T.-H., 2023. The fractured-land hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 138, 1173-1231.

Galor, O., 2022. The Journey of Humanity: The Origins of Wealth and Inequality. Dutton.

Hirshleifer, J., 1991. The paradox of power. Economics and Politics, 3, 177-200.

Hirshleifer, J., 2000. The macrotechnology of conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44, 773-792.

Hoffman, P., 2015. Why Did Europe Conquer the World?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hume, D., 1741. Essays, Moral and Political. Edinburgh: A. Kincaid. Jones, E., 1981. The European Miracle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Karayalcin, C., 2008. Divided we stand, united we fall: The Hume-North-Jones mechanism for the rise of Europe. International Economic Review, 49, 973-997.

Kiser, E., and Cai, Y., 2003. War and bureaucratization in Qin China: Exploring an anomalous case. American Sociological Review, 68, 511-539.

Ko, C. Y., Koyama, M., and Sng, T.-H., 2018. Unified China and divided Europe. International Economic Review, 59, 285-327.

Lagerlof, N.-P., 2014. Population, technology and fragmentation: the European miracle revisited. Journal of Development Economics, 108, 87-105.

Malthus, T.R., 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population. Oxford World's Classics.

Maxwell, J. W., and Reuveny, R., 2005. Continuing conflict. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58, 30-52.

Mokyr, J., 2016. A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

North, D., 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.

Prskawetz, A., Gragnani, A., and Feichtinger, G., 2003. Reconsidering the dynamic interaction of renewable resources and population growth: A focus on long run sustainability. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 8, 35-45.

Scheidel, W., 2019. Escape from Rome. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Skaperdas, S., and Syropoulos, C., 1996. Can the shadow of the future harm cooperation? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 29, 353-372.

Strulik, H., 2017. Contraception and development: A unified growth theory. International Economic Review, 58, 561-584.

Strulik, H., and Weisdorf, J., 2008. Population, food, and knowledge: A simple unified growth theory. Journal of Economic Growth, 13, 195-216.

Voigtlander, N., and Voth, H.-J., 2013. How the West "invented" fertility restriction. American Economic Review, 103, 2227-2264.

Willmott, W. E., 1989. Dujiangyan: Irrigation and society in Sichuan, China. Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 22, 143-153.