Tamilina, Larysa and Hryniv, Dzvenyslava and Hulko, Pavlo (2024): The Primary Predictors Behind the Formation of Social Bubbles on Online Social Media Platforms: Focusing on Young Individuals in Ukraine. Forthcoming in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_121084.pdf Download (292kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This research focuses on examining why young social media users might become trapped in a "social bubble" defined as seeking information that supports only one’s existing beliefs. We use a method called Qualitative Comparative Analysis to identify various combinations of factors that either contribute to or prevent the formation of these bubbles. Our findings reveal three combinations that tend to create social bubbles. All three involve young people's tendency to conform to dominant opinions and how often they expose themselves to diverse viewpoints. We have also identified one combination that leads to the opposite outcome, where young individuals reject the idea of being in a social bubble. Specifically, such persons are characterized by rarely conforming to dominant opinions, engaging in frequent debates, and regularly exposing themselves to diverse perspectives, even if they use only a few social media platforms. These results suggest that universities can play an important role in shaping social media behavior by teaching students to seek out diverse viewpoints and critically evaluate them to form their own independent opinions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Primary Predictors Behind the Formation of Social Bubbles on Online Social Media Platforms: Focusing on Young Individuals in Ukraine |
English Title: | The Primary Predictors Behind the Formation of Social Bubbles on Online Social Media Platforms: Focusing on Young Individuals in Ukraine |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Social media, Social bubbles, QCQ, Young users, Ukraine |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs > C80 - General |
Item ID: | 121084 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Larysa Tamilina |
Date Deposited: | 28 May 2024 07:05 |
Last Modified: | 28 May 2024 07:05 |
References: | Alatawi, F., Cheng, L., Tahir, A., et al. (2021) A Survey on Echo Chambers on Social Media: Description, Detection and Mitigation. Downloaded from https://europepmc.org/article/ppr/ppr454066. Ausat, A. M. A. (2023) The Role of Social Media in Shaping Public Opinion and Its Influence on Economic Decisions. Technology and Society Perspectives (TACIT), 1(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.61100/tacit.v1i1.37. Bautista, J.M. and Mabulay, E. P. (2023) An In-Depth Exploration of How Young Adults' Decision-Making Is Influenced by Peer Pressure and Conformity. A Journal Analysis presented as a final requirement For Social Psychology SOCP311. Bessi, A. (2016) Personality Traits and Echo Chambers on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 319-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.016. Bozdag, Ç. (2020) Managing Diverse Online Networks in the Context of Polarization: Understanding how we grow apart on and through social media. Social Media + Society, 6(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120975713. Burbach, L., Halbach, P., Ziefle, M. and Calero Valdez, A. (2020) Opinion Formation on the Internet: The Influence of Personality, Network Structure, and Content on Sharing Messages Online. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, 1 – 16. 10.3389/frai.2020.00045. Dorcas, A. (2023) Everything You Need to Know about Social Media Algorithms. Downloaded from https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-media-algorithms/. Easley, D. and Kleinberg, J. (2010) Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press. Emmenegger, P., Schraff, D. and Walter, A. (2014) QCA, the Truth Table Analysis and Large-N Survey Data: The Benefits of Calibration and the Importance of Robustness Tests. COMPASSS Working Paper. Downloaded from http://www.compasss.org/wpseries/ EmmeneggerSchraffWalter2014.pdf. Kitchens, B., Johnson, S.V. and Gray P. (2020) Understanding Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles: The Impact of Social Media on Diversification and Partisan Shifts in News Consumption. Mis Quarterly, 44(4), 1619-1649. 10.25300/MISQ/2020/16371. Luthar, S.S., Cicchetti, D. and Becker, B. (2000) The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work. Child Development, 71, 543 – 562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164. Modgil, S., Singh, R.K., Gupta, S. and Dennehy, D. (2021) A Confirmation Bias View on Social Media: Induced Polarization During Covid-19. Information Systems Frontiers, 20, 1 – 25. 10.1007/s10796-021-10222-9. Oana, I-E., Schneider, C.Q. and Thomann, E. (2021) Introduction: QCA in a Nutshell. In: Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using R: A Beginner’s Guide. Methods for Social Inquiry. Cambridge University Press; 3-24. Rihoux, B. and Lobe, B. (2009) The Case for Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Adding Leverage for Thick Cross-case Comparison. In The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods (Eds) D.S. Byrne, Charles C. Ragin, 222 -242. 10.4135/9781446249413.n13. Riva, G., Wiederhold, B.K., Cipresso, P. (Eds.) (2016) The Psychology of Social Networking Personal Experience in Online Communities. De Gruyter Open Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/121084 |