Silver Spoons and Scales of Justice: The Fairness Preference over Unequal Intergenerational Wealth Transfers

Lu, Kelin (2024): Silver Spoons and Scales of Justice: The Fairness Preference over Unequal Intergenerational Wealth Transfers.

Abstract

Intergenerational transfers are widespread and significantly unequal. This study explores people’s fairness preferences regarding inequality caused by wealth transfers from economically advantaged parents through a large-scale experiment. In the experiment, workers and their parents completed assignments. Workers’ earnings were derived either from their own merit or luck, or from wealth transferred by their parents, also earned via merit or luck. Impartial spectators from the U.S. and China then made real distributive decisions. Our results indicate a pronounced aversion among Americans to inequalities stemming from intergenerational transfers compared with those from self-earned wealth. In contrast, the Chinese exhibited only a mild aversion. Moreover, Americans showed a preference for intergenerational meritocracy, more accepting inequalities in transferred wealth when it resulted from parental merit rather than parental luck—a preference not shared by the Chinese. Further experiments suggest that attitudes toward unequal intergenerational wealth transfers are primarily driven by whether parents possess wealth to transfer rather than the choice to transfer it

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Fairness, wealth inequality, social preference, intergenerational transfer
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics; D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice

References

Adermon, Adrian, Mikael Lindahl, and Daniel Waldenström, “Intergenerational wealth mobility and the role of inheritance: Evidence from multiple generations,” The Economic Journal, 2018, 128 (612), F482–F513.

Akbaş, Merve, Dan Ariely, and Sevgi Yuksel, “When is inequality fair? An experiment on the effect of procedural justice and agency,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2019, 161, 114–127.

Alesina, Alberto and George-Marios Angeletos, “Fairness and redistribution,” American Economic Review, 2005, 95 (4), 960–980.

Alesina, Alberto, Stefanie Stantcheva, and Edoardo Teso, “Intergenerational mobility and preferences for redistribution,” American Economic Review, 2018, 108 (2), 521–554.

Almås, Ingvild, Alexander W. Cappelen, and Bertil Tungodden, “Cutthroat capitalism versus cuddly socialism: Are Americans more meritocratic and efficiency-seeking than Scandinavians?,” Journal of Political Economy, 2020, 128 (5), 1753–1788.

Almås, Ingvild, Alexander W. Cappelen, E.O. Sorensen, and Bertil Tungodden, “Fairness across the World: Preferences and Beliefs,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2021.

Almås, Ingvild, Alexander W. Cappelen, Erik Ø. Sørensen, and Bertil Tungodden, “Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance,” Science, 2010, 328 (5982), 1176–1178.

Ameriks, John, Joseph Briggs, Andrew Caplin, Matthew D. Shapiro, and Christopher Tonetti, “Long-term-care utility and late-in-life saving,” Journal of Political Economy, 2020, 128 (6), 2375–2451.

Andre, Peter, “Shallow meritocracy,” Review of Economic Studies, 2024, p. rdae040.

Andreoni, James, Deniz Aydin, Blake Barton, B. Douglas Bernheim, and Jeffrey Naecker, “When fair isn’t fair: Understanding choice reversals involving social preferences,” Journal of Political Economy, 2020, 128 (5), 1673–1711.

Bastani, Spencer and Daniel Waldenström, “Perceptions of inherited wealth and the support for inheritance taxation,” Economica, 2021, 88 (350), 532–569.

Bhattacharya, Puja and Johanna Mollerstrom, “Lucky to Work,” 2022.

Bjørnskov, Christian, Axel Dreher, Justina A.V. Fischer, Jan Schnellenbach, and Kai Gehring, “Inequality and happiness: When perceived social mobility and economic reality do not match,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2013, 91, 75–92.

Black, Sandra E., Paul J. Devereux, Fanny Landaud, and Kjell G. Salvanes, “The (un) importance of inheritance,” Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2022.

Black, Sandra E., Paul J. Devereux, Petter Lundborg, and Kaveh Majlesi, “Poor little rich kids? The role of nature versus nurture in wealth and other economic outcomes and behaviours,” The Review of Economic Studies, 2020, 87 (4), 1683–1725.

Bortolotti, Stefania, Ivan Soraperra, Matthias Sutter, and Claudia Zoller, “Too lucky to be true: Fairness views under the shadow of cheating,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 2023, pp. 1–45.

Boserup, Simon H., Wojciech Kopczuk, and Claus T. Kreiner, “The role of bequests in shaping wealth inequality: Evidence from Danish wealth records,” American Economic Review, 2016, 106 (5), 656–661.

Bowles, Samuel and Herbert Gintis, “Inter-generational inequality,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, 16 (3), 1–28.

Brandts, Jordi and Gary Charness, “The strategy versus the direct-response method: A first survey of experimental comparisons,” Experimental Economics, 2011, 14, 375–398.

Cappelen, Alexander W., Astri Drange Hole, Erik Ø. Sørensen, and Bertil Tungodden, “The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach,” American Economic Review, 2007, 97 (3), 818–827.

Cappelen, Alexander W., Erik Ø. Sørensen, and Bertil Tungodden, “Responsibility for what? Fairness and individual responsibility,” European Economic Review, 2010, 54 (3), 429–441.

Cappelen, Alexander W., James Konow, Erik Ø. Sørensen, and Bertil Tungodden, “Just luck: An experimental study of risk-taking and fairness,” American Economic Review, 2013, 103 (4), 1398–1413.

Cappelen, Alexander W., Johanna Mollerstrom, Bjørn-Atle Reme, and Bertil Tungodden, “A meritocratic origin of egalitarian behaviour,” The Economic Journal, 2022, 132 (646), 2101–2117.

Cappelen, Alexander W., Karl Ove Moene, Siv-Elisabeth Skjelbred, and Bertil Tungodden, “The merit primacy effect,” The Economic Journal, 2023, 133 (651), 951–970.

Cappelen, Alexander W., Ranveig Falch, and Bertil Tungodden, “Fair and unfair income inequality,” Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics, 2020, pp. 1–25.

Cappelen, Alexander W., Ranveig Falch, Erik Ø. Sørensen, and Bertil Tungodden, “Solidarity and fairness in times of crisis,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2021, 186, 1–11.

Cappelen, Alexander W., Ranveig Falch, Zhongjing Huang, and Bertil Tungodden, “Acceptance of inequality between children: Large-Scale Experimental Evidence from China and Norway,” NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper, 2022, (10).

Cappelen, Alexander W., Sebastian Fest, Erik Ø. Sørensen, and Bertil Tungodden, “Choice and personal responsibility: What is a morally relevant choice?,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 2022, 104 (5), 1110–1119.

Cassar, Lea and Arnd H. Klein, “A matter of perspective: How failure shapes distributive preferences,” Management Science, 2019, 65 (11), 5050–5064.

Charness, Gary, Uri Gneezy, and Brianna Halladay, “Experimental methods: Pay one or pay all,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2016, 131, 141–150.

Cherry, Todd L., Peter Frykblom, and Jason F. Shogren, “Hardnose the dictator,” American Economic Review, 2002, 92 (4), 1218–1221.

Clot, Sophie, Gilles Grolleau, and Lisette Ibanez, “Shall we pay all? An experimental test of random incentivized systems,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2018, 73, 93–98.

Cohen, Rachelle, Amnon Maltz, and Yuval Ofek-Shanny, “Social Preferences Over Taste-Based Inequality,” 2022.

Dong, Lu, Lingbo Huang, and Jaimie W. Lien, “They Never Had a Chance: Unequal opportunities and fair redistributions,” Technical Report, CeDEx Discussion Paper Series, 2022.

Durante, Ruben, Louis Putterman, and Joël Van der Weele, “Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: An experimental study,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 2014, 12 (4), 1059–1086.

Elinder, Mikael, Oscar Erixson, and Daniel Waldenström, “Inheritance and wealth inequality: Evidence from population registers,” Journal of Public Economics, 2018, 165, 17–30.

Exley, Christine L. and Judd B. Kessler, “Equity concerns are narrowly framed,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2024, 16 (2), 147–179.

Fagereng, Andreas, Magne Mogstad, and Marte Rønning, “Why do wealthy parents have wealthy children?,” Journal of Political Economy, 2021, 129 (3), 703–756.

Falk, Armin, Ernst Fehr, and Urs Fischbacher, “On the nature of fair behavior,” Economic Inquiry, 2003, 41 (1), 20–26.

Feiveson, Laura and John Sabelhaus, “How does intergenerational wealth transmission affect wealth concentration?,” 2018.

Freyer, Timo and Laurenz R.K. Günther, “Inherited inequality and the dilemma of meritocracy,” Technical Report, ECONtribute Discussion Paper, 2022.

Haaland, Ingar, Christopher Roth, and Johannes Wohlfart, “Designing Information Provision Experiments,” Journal of Economic Literature, 2023, 61 (1), 3–40.

Horioka, Charles Yuji and Wakō Watanabe, “Why do people save

? A micro-analysis of motives for household saving in Japan,” The Economic Journal, 1997, 107 (442), 537–552.

Konow, James, “Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions,” American Economic Review, 2000, 90 (4), 1072–1092.

Kotlikoff, Laurence J. and Lawrence H. Summers, “The role of intergenerational transfers in aggregate capital accumulation,” Journal of Political Economy, 1981, 89 (4), 706–732.

Modigliani, Franco, “The role of intergenerational transfers and life cycle saving in the accumulation of wealth,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1988, 2 (2), 15–40.

Mollerstrom, Johanna, Bjørn-Atle Reme, and Erik Ø. Sørensen, “Luck, choice and responsibility—An experimental study of fairness views,” Journal of Public Economics, 2015, 131, 33–40.

Nekoei, Arash and David Seim, “How do inheritances shape wealth inequality? Theory and evidence from Sweden,” The Review of Economic Studies, 2023, 90 (1), 463–498.

Piketty, Thomas, “On the long-run evolution of inheritance: France 1820–2050,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2011, 126 (3), 1071–1131.

Piketty, Thomas, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Harvard University Press, 2014.

Piketty, Thomas, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman, “Rethinking capital and wealth taxation,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2023, 39 (3), 575–591.

Qi, Xiaoying, “Filial Obligation in Contemporary China: Evolution of the Culture-System,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 2015, 45 (1), 141–161.

Roth, Christopher and Johannes Wohlfart, “Experienced inequality and preferences for redistribution,” Journal of Public Economics, 2018, 167, 251–262.

Rubin, Kenneth H. and Ock Boon Chung, Parenting beliefs, behaviors, and parent-child relations: A cross-cultural perspective, Psychology Press, 2013.

Schaube, Sebastian and Louis Strang, “(Not) Everyone Can Be a Winner–the Role of Payoff Interdependence for Redistribution,” Available at SSRN 4419549, 2023.

Stantcheva, Stefanie, “Understanding tax policy: How do people reason?,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2021, 136 (4), 2309–2369.

Starmans, Christina, Mark Sheskin, and Paul Bloom, “Why people prefer unequal societies,” Nature Human Behaviour, 2017, 1 (4), 1–7.