Donna, Javier and Pereira, Pedro (2024): Structural Presumptions for Non-horizontal Mergers in the 2023 Merger Guidelines: A Primer and a Path Forward. Published in: Review of Industrial Organization , Vol. 64, No. 5 (15 July 2024): pp. 1-43.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_121615.pdf Download (896kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The 2023 Merger Guidelines (MGs) change the Agencies’ narrative regarding non-horizontal mergers. They follow a four-pronged approach: (1) They blend horizontal and non-horizontal mergers. (2) They simplify the narrative about non-horizontal mergers. (3) They consoli- date and broaden the theories of harm in non-horizontal mergers. (4) They blend economics and law analysis. In this article, we elaborate on these points. We discuss how the MGs’ an- ticompetitive presumptions apply to non-horizontal mergers, relate them to the economics literature, and provide examples. We finish discussing the economic rationale of the struc- tural presumption involving rivals’ exit concerns due to the exercise of market power and propose a path forward.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Structural Presumptions for Non-horizontal Mergers in the 2023 Merger Guidelines: A Primer and a Path Forward |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Antitrust, 2023 Merger Guidelines, Vertical Mergers, Rivals' Exit, Double Marginalization, Merger Evaluation, Competition Policy |
Subjects: | K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K41 - Litigation Process K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K42 - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L44 - Antitrust Policy and Public Enterprises, Nonprofit Institutions, and Professional Organizations L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L52 - Industrial Policy ; Sectoral Planning Methods |
Item ID: | 121615 |
Depositing User: | Professor Javier Donna |
Date Deposited: | 17 Aug 2024 13:53 |
Last Modified: | 17 Aug 2024 13:53 |
References: | Alderman, B., Blair, R. D., & Donna, J. D. (2024). The microsoft acquisition of activision: Neither horizontal nor vertical. Working Paper, University of Florida. Allain, M. L., Chambolle, C., & Rey, P. (2016). Vertical integration as a source of hold-up. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(1), 1–25. Allen, B. T. (1971). Vertical integration and market foreclosure: The case of cement and concrete. The Journal of Law and Economics, 14(1), 251–274. Andrzejewski, S. (2023). Antitrust complaints filed against Ticketmaster and live Nation in Cali- fornia: An overview and analysis. The University of Chicago Business Law Review. Antón, M., Ederer, F., Giné, M., & Schmalz, M. C. (2024). Innovation: The bright side of common ownership? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 32192. Antón, M., Ederer, F., Giné, M., & Schmalz, M. (2023). Common ownership, competition, and top management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 131(5), 1294–1355. Areeda, P. E., & Hovenkamp, H. (2015–2021). Antitrust law: An analysis of antitrust principles and their application. Fourth and Fifth Editions ed. Originally published in 1978. Aryal, G., Ciliberto, F., & Leyden, B. T. (2022). Coordinated capacity reductions and public commu- nication in the airline industry. The Review of Economic Studies, 89(6), 3055–3084. Ashenfelter, O. C., Hosken, D. S., & Weinberg, M. C. (2015). Efficiencies brewed: pricing and con- solidation in the US beer industry. The RAND Journal of Economics, 46(2), 328–361. Ashenfelter, O. C., Hosken, D. S., & Weinberg, M. C. (2013). The price effects of a large merger of manufacturers: A case study of Maytag-Whirlpool. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(1), 239–261. Asker, J. (2016). Diagnosing foreclosure due to exclusive dealing. The Journal of Industrial Econom- ics, 64(3), 375–410. Asker, J., & Nocke, V. (2021). Collusion, mergers, and related antitrust issues. In Handbook of indus- trial organization (vol. 5, pp. 177–279). Elsevier. Athey, S., & Morton, F. S. (2022). Platform annexation. Antitrust Law Journal, 84(3), 677–703. Athey, S., Chicu, M., Krishna, M., & Marinescu, I. (2023). The year in review: Economics at the antitrust division, 2022–2023. Review of Industrial Organization, 63, 525–544. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2022). Spirit Super and Palisade Investment Partners Consortium decides not to proceed with Port of Geelong acquisition. Australian Com- petition and Consumer Commission Website. Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L. F., Patterson, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2020). The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2), 645–709. Azar, J. A., Berry, S. T., & Marinescu, I. (2022). Estimating labor market power. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. w30365. Azar, J., Marinescu, I., & Steinbaum, M. (2022). Labor market concentration. Journal of Human Resources, 57(S), S167–S199. Azar, J., Marinescu, I., Steinbaum, M., & Taska, B. (2020). Concentration in US labor markets: Evidence from online vacancy data. Labour Economics, 66, 101886. Azar, J., Schmalz, M. C., & Tecu, I. (2018). Anticompetitive effects of common ownership. The Journal of Finance, 73(4), 1513–1565. Backus, M., Conlon, C., & Sinkinson, M. (2019). The common ownership hypothesis: Theory and evidence. Economic Studies at Brookings, 1980–2017. Baker, J. B., & Shapiro, C. (2008). Reinvigorating horizontal merger enforcement. In How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark: The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust. Oxford University Press. Bassier, I., Dube, A., & Naidu, S. (2022). Monopsony in movers: The elasticity of labor supply to firm wage policies. Journal of Human Resources, 57(S), S50–S86. Beck, M., & Scott Morton, F. (2021). Evaluating the evidence on vertical mergers. Review of Industrial Organization, 59(2), 273–302. Benkard, C. L., Yurukoglu A., & Zhang, A. L. (2021). Concentration in product markets. National Bureau of Economic Research. Berger, D. W., Hasenzagl, T., Herkenhoff, K. F., Mongey, S., & Posner, E. A. (2023). Merger guidelines for the labor market. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. w31147. Bernheim, B. D., & Whinston, M. D. (1998). Exclusive dealing. Journal of political Economy, 106(1), 64–103. Berry, S., Gaynor, M., & Morton, F. S. (2019). Do increasing markups matter? Lessons from empirical industrial organization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(3), 44–68. Bet, G. (2021). Market power in the US airline industry. Bet, G., Blair, R. D., & Donna, J. D. (2022). The economic rationale of United States v. Google. The Antitrust Bulletin, 67(1), 23–39. Bhattacharya, V., Illanes, G., & Stillerman, D. (2023). Merger effects and antitrust enforcement: Evidence from US retail. National Bureau of Economic Research No. w31123 Bonnet, C., & Dubois, P. (2010). Inference on vertical contracts between manufacturers and retailers allowing for nonlinear pricing and resale price maintenance. The RAND Journal of Economics, 41(1), 139–164. Bork, R. H. (1978). The antitrust paradox: A policy at war with itself. Bork Publishing. Published in 2021. Originally published in 1978. Brown, Z. Y., & MacKay, A. (2023). Competition in pricing algorithms. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 15(2), 109–156. Bulow, J. I., Geanakoplos, J. D., & Klemperer, P. D. (1985). Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. Journal of Political economy, 93(3), 488–511. Cabral, L. (2021). Merger policy in digital industries.” Information Economics and Policy, 54: 100866. Antitrust in the Digital Economy. Caradonna, P., Miller, N., & Sheu, G. (2023). Mergers, entry, and consumer welfare. Georgetown McDonough School of Business Research Paper No. 3537135. Chipty, T. (2001). Vertical integration, market foreclosure, and consumer welfare in the cable television Industry. American Economic Review, 91, 428–453. Choi, J. P., & Kim, B. C. (2010). Net neutrality and investment incentives. RAND Journal of Economics, 41(3), 446–471. Cho, I., & Williams, N. (2024). Collusive outcomes without collusion. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2403.07177. Ciliberto, F., Murry, C., & Tamer, E. (2021). Market structure and competition in airline markets. Journal of Political Economy, 129(11), 2995–3038. Collins, D. (2016). Antitrust Law, Unit 9: Introduction to Mergers. NYU School of Law, Available at https://appliedantitrust.com/09_merger_guidelines/unit9_materials2016.pdf (Accessed January 11, 2024). Cooper, Z., Craig, S. V., Gaynor, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2019). The price ain’t right? Hospital prices and health spending on the privately insured. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(1), 51–107. Corbett, C. J., Zhou, D., & Tang, C. S. (2004). Designing supply contracts: Contract type and information asymmetry. Management Science, 50(4), 550–559. Cournot, A. A. (1838). Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses. L. Hachette. Crawford, G. S., Lee, R. S., Whinston, M. D., & Yurukoglu, A. (2018). The welfare effects of vertical integration in multichannel television markets. Econometrica, 86(3), 891–954. Cunningham, C., Ederer, F., & Ma, S. (2021). Killer acquisitions. Journal of Political Economy, 129(3), 649–702. Debreu, G. (1970). Economies with a finite set of equilibria. Econometrica, 38, 387–392. De Corniere, A., & Taylor, G. (2019). A model of biased intermediation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 50(4), 854–882. Loecker, D., Jan, J. E., & Unger, G. (2020). The rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2), 561–644. Donna, J. D. (2021). Measuring long-run gasoline price elasticities in urban travel demand. The RAND Journal of Economics, 52(4), 945–994. Donna, J. D., & Walsh, A. N. (2023). (Lack of) competition, coordination, and information sharing in the Pork Industry: United States, 2009–2020. The Antitrust Bulletin, 68(1), 117–136. Donna, J. D., & Espín-Sánchez, J.-A. (2024). The illiquidity of water markets. Review of Economic Studies, (forthcoming). Available at SSRN 2667654. Donna, J. D., & Pereira, P. (2023). Rivals’ Exit and Vertical Merger Evaluation. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 19(2), 220–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhad002 Donna, J. D., & Pereira, P. (2023b). Rivals’ exit should be incorporated into the guidelines for vertical merger evaluation. ProMarket, Stigler Center, University of Chicago, May 2023. Donna, J. D., & Pereira, P. (2023c). An anticompetitive presumption for exit-inducing vertical arrangements. Draft Merger Guidelines for Public Comment by the Federal Trade Commission, Docket ID: FTC-2023-0043, Tracking Number: lm7-ttk2-thh7, Available at SSRN 4709489, https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.4709489. Donna, J. D., Pereira, P., & Pu, Y. (2024). Exit-inducing vertical mergers. Working Paper, University of Florida. Donna, J. D., Pereira, P., Pires, T., & Trindade, A. (2022). Measuring the welfare of intermediaries. Man- agement Science, 68(11), 8083–8115. Donna, J. D., Pereira, P., Pu, Y., Trindade, A., & Yoshida R. C. (2024). Direct sales and bargaining. RAND Journal of Economics, (forthcoming), Available at SSRN 3779962. Dube, J.-P., Hitsch, G. J., & Rossi, P. E. (2009). Do switching costs make markets less competitive? Jour- nal of Marketing Research, 46(4), 435–445. Dube, J.-P., Hitsch, G. J., & Rossi, P. E. (2010). State dependence and alternative explanations for con- sumer inertia. The RAND Journal of Economics, 41(3), 417–445. Eeckhout, J. (2022). The profit paradox: How thriving firms threaten the future of work. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Elhauge, E. (2020). How horizontal shareholding harms our economy-and why antitrust law can fix it. Harvard Business Law Review, 10, 207. Fan, Y., & Yang, C. (2020). Competition, product proliferation, and welfare: A study of the US smart- phone market. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 12(2), 99–134. Fan, Y., & Yang, C. (2022). Estimating discrete games with many firms and many decisions: An applica- tion to merger and product variety (p. w30146). No: National Bureau of Economic Research. Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (2000). Scale economies and synergies in horizontal merger analysis. Antitrust Law Journal, 68, 685. Farrell, J., & Klemperer, P. (2007). Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 3, 1967–2072. Federal Trade Commission and Plaintiff States v. Amazon.com, Inc. (2023). District Court of Western District of Washington. Case 2:23-cv-01495-JHC Document 114 Filed 11/02/23. Federal Trade Commission Complaint (2022). In the Matter of Microsoft Corp. and Activision Blizzard Inc., United States of America Before the Federal Trade Commission. Docket No.9412, file number 2210077. Federal Trade Commission v. Facebook (2021). First Amended Complaint For Injunctive and Other Equitable Relief, United States District Court for the District Of Columbia. Case No.: 1:20-cv- 03590-JEB, Filed 08/19/21. Federico, G., Langus, G., & Valletti, T. (2018). Reprint of: Horizontal mergers and product innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 61, 590–612. Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1991). Game theory. MIT Press. Fumagalli, C., & Motta, M. (2006). Exclusive dealing and entry, when buyers compete. American Economic Review, 96(3), 785–795. Gal-Or, E. (1991). Vertical restraints with incomplete information. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 39(5), 503–516. Grieco, P., Pinkse, J., & Slade, M. (2018). Brewed in North America: Mergers, marginal costs, and efficiency. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 59, 24–65. Gutiérrez, G., & Philippon, T. (2017). Declining competition and investment in the US. NBER Working paper No. w23583, National Bureau of Economic Research. Hart, O. D., & Tirole, J. (1990). Vertical integration and market foreclosure. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 205–276. Hastings, J. S. (2004). Vertical relationships and competition in retail gasoline markets: Empirical evidence from contract changes in Southern California. American Economic Review, 94(1), 317–328. Hemphill, C. S., & Rose, N. L. (2017). Mergers that harm sellers. Yale Law Journal, 127, 2078. Hortaçsu, A., & Syverson, C. (2007). Cementing relationships: Vertical integration, foreclosure, productivity, and prices. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), 250–301. Hortaçsu, A., Madanizadeh, S. A., & Puller, S. L. (2017). Power to choose? An analysis of consumer inertia in the residential electricity market. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(4), 192–226. Houde, J.-F. (2012). Spatial differentiation and vertical mergers in retail markets for gasoline. American Economic Review, 102(5), 2147–2182. Hovenkamp, E. (2018). Platform antitrust. The Journal of Corporation Law, 44, 713. Hovenkamp, E. (2023). The competitive effects of search engine defaults. USC CLASS Research Paper No. 24-10, Available at SSRN 4647211. Igami, M., & Sugaya, T. (2022). Measuring the incentive to collude: the vitamin cartels, 1990–99. The Review of Economic Studies, 89(3), 1460–1494. Jullien, B., Pavan, A., & Rysman, M.(2021). Two-sided markets, pricing, and network effects. In Handbook of Industrial Organization (vol. 4, pp. 485–592). Elsevier. Kamepalli, S. K., Rajan, R., & Zingales L. (2020). Kill zone. National Bureau of Economic Research. Kaplow, L., & Shapiro, C. (2007). Antitrust. Harvard John M. Olin Center For Law, Economics, And Business, Discussion Paper No. 575, ISSN 1045-6333. Kaplow, L. (2010). Why (ever) define markets. Harvard Law Review, 124, 437. Kaplow, L. (2013). Market definition: Impossible and counterproductive. Antitrust Law Journal, 79(361), 361. Klemperer, P. (1987). The competitiveness of markets with switching costs. The RAND Journal of Economics, 18, 138–150. Klemperer, P. (1987). Markets with consumer switching costs. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(2), 375–394. Kwoka, J. (2015). Mergers, merger control, and remedies: A retrospective analysis of US policy. MIT Press. Kwoka, J. (2016). The structural presumption and the safe harbor in merger review: False positives or unwarranted concerns. Antitrust Law Journal, 81, 837. Kwoka, J., & Shumilkina, E. (2010). The price effect of eliminating potential competition: Evidence from an airline merger. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 58(4), 767–793. Kwoka, J., & Slade, M. (2019). Second thoughts on double marginalization. Antitrust, 34, 51. Lancieri, F., Posner, E. A., & Zingales, L. (2022). The Political Economy of the Decline of Antitrust Enforcement in the United States. National Bureau of Economic Research. Lee, R. S., Whinston, M. D., Yurukoglu, A. (2021). Structural empirical analysis of contracting in vertical markets. In Handbook of Industrial Organization (vol. 4, pp. 673–742). Elsevier. Letina, I., Schmutzler, A., & Seibel, R. (2021). Killer acquisitions and beyond: Policy effects on innovation strategies. University of Zurich, Department of Economics, Working Paper No. 358. Li, S., Mazur, J., Roberts, J., & Sweeting, A. (2015). Airline mergers and the potential entry defense. Discussion paper, University of Maryland. Luco, F., & Marshall, G. (2020). The competitive impact of vertical integration by multiproduct firms. American Economic Review, 110(7), 2041–2064. Marinescu, I., & Hovenkamp, H. (2019). Anticompetitive mergers in labor markets. Indiana Law Journal, 94, 1031. Marvel, H. P. (1982). Exclusive dealing. Journal of Law and Economics, 25(1), 1–25. Miller, N. H., & Weinberg, M. C. (2017). Understanding the price effects of the MillerCoors joint venture. Econometrica, 85(6), 1763–1791. Miller, N. H., Sheu, G., & Weinberg, M. C. (2021). Oligopolistic price leadership and mergers: The United States beer industry. American Economic Review, 111(10), 3123–3159. Moresi, S., & Salop, S. C. (2021). When vertical is horizontal: How vertical mergers lead to increases in “effective concentration". Review of Industrial Organization, 59, 177–204. Moss, D. L. (2020). What does expanding horizontal control mean for antitrust enforcement? A Look at Mergers, Partial Ownership, and Joint Ventures. A Look at Mergers, Partial Ownership, and Joint Ventures (November 4, 2020). Available at SSRN: 3860363. Motta, M. (2004). Competition policy: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. Naidu, S. (2010). Recruitment restrictions and labor markets: Evidence from the postbellum US South. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(2), 413–445. Naidu, S., & Posner, E. A. (2022). Labor monopsony and the limits of the law. Journal of Human Resources, 57(S), S284–S323. Naidu, S., Posner, E. A., & Weyl, G. (2018). Antitrust remedies for labor market power. Harvard Law Review, 132(2), 536–601. Naidu, S., Nyarko, Y., & Wang, S.-Y. (2016). Monopsony power in migrant labor markets: Evidence from the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Political Economy, 124(6), 1735–1792. Naidu, S., Nyarko, Y., & Wang, S.-Y. (2023). The benefits and costs of guest worker programs: Experimental evidence from the India-UAE Migration Corridor. National Bureau of Economic Research. Nevo, A. (2000). Mergers with differentiated products: The case of the ready-to-eat cereal industry. The RAND Journal of Economics, 31(3), 395–421. Nocke, V., & White, L. (2007). Do vertical mergers facilitate upstream collusion? American Economic Review, 97(4), 1321–1339. Nocke, V., & Whinston, M. D. (2010). Dynamic merger review. Journal of Political Economy, 118(6), 1200–1251. Nocke, V., & Whinston, M. D. (2022). Concentration thresholds for horizontal mergers. American Economic Review, 112(6), 1915–48. Nocke, V., & Rey, P. (2018). Exclusive dealing and vertical integration in interlocking relationships. Journal of Economic Theory, 177, 183–221. OECD. (2017). Common Ownership by Institutional Investors and its Impact on Competition, Background Note by the Secretariat. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Website. Ordover, J. A., Saloner, G., & Salop, S. C. (1990). Equilibrium vertical foreclosure. American Economic Review, 80(1), 127–142. Park, A. H., & Seo, K. (2019). Common ownership and product market competition: Evidence from the us airline industry. Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 48(5), 617–640. Pereira, P., & Ribeiro, T. (2018). Evaluating partial divestitures when vertical relations are important. Review of Industrial Organization, 53(2), 321–345. Peterson, C. L., & Steinbaum, M. (2023). Coercive rideshare practices: At the intersection of antitrust and consumer protection law in the gig economy. University of Chicago Law Review, 90, 623. Prager, E., & Schmitt, M. (2021). Employer consolidation and wages: Evidence from hospitals. American Economic Review, 111(2), 397–427. ProMarket Writers. (2024). The trends and cases that will define US Antitrust in 2024. Stigler Center, University of Chicago, January 2024. Available at: https://www.promarket.org/2024/01/05/the- trends-and-cases-that-will-define-us-antitrust-in-2024/ (Accessed January 11, 2024). Rasmusen, E. B., Mark Ramseyer, J., & Wiley, J. S. (1991). Naked exclusion. The American Economic Review, 81(5), 1137–1145. Reimers, I., & Waldfogel, J. (2023). A framework for detection, measurement, and welfare analysis of platform bias. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 31766. Rey, P., & Tirole, J. (2007). A Primer on Foreclosure. In M. Armstrong & R. H. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization (Vol. 3, pp. 145–2220). Riordan, M. H., & Salop, S. C. (1995). Evaluating vertical mergers: A post-Chicago approach. Antitrust Law Journal, 63(2), 513–568. Rogerson, W. P. (2020). Modelling and predicting the competitive effects of vertical mergers: The bargaining leverage over rivals effect. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 53(2), 407–436. Rogerson, W. P. (2021). The upstream pass-through rate, bargaining power and the magnitude of the Raising Rivals’ Costs (RRC) effect. Review of Industrial Organization, 59(2), 205–227. Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of economic perspectives, 23(3), 125–143. Salinger, M. A. (1988). Vertical mergers and market foreclosure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(2), 345–356. Salop, S. (2023). An Excessive Evidentiary Burden Sunk the FTC’s Case Against the Meta/Within Merger. ProMarket, Stigler Center, University of Chicago, February 2023. Salop, S. C. (1981). Strategy, predation, and antitrust analysis. Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics, Bureau of Competition. Salop, S. C. (2015). The evolution and vitality of merger presumptions: A decision-theoretic approach. Antitrust Law Journal, 80(2), 269–306. Salop, S. C. (2018). Invigorating vertical merger enforcement. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 45222589. Salop, S. C. (2020). The 2020 Vertical merger guidelines: A suggested revision. Available at: https:// www.ftc.gov/system/files/attachments/798-draft-vertical-merger-guidelines/salop_suggested_verti cal_merger_guidelines.pdf (Accessed January 11, 2024). Salop, S. C., & Scheffman, D. T. (1983). Raising rivals’ costs. The American Economic Review, 73(2), 267–271. Scheffman, D., & Higgins, R. S. (2014). Raising Rivals’ Costs. In R. D. Blair & D. D. Sokol (Eds.), Oxford handbook on international antitrust economics. (Vol. 62). Oxford University Press. Schmalz, M. C. (2018). Common-ownership concentration and corporate conduct. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 10, 413–448. Schmalz, M. C. (2021). Recent studies on common ownership, firm behavior, and market outcomes. The Antitrust Bulletin, 66(1), 12–38. Morton, S., Fiona, M., & Dinielli, D. C. (2022). Roadmap for an antitrust case against facebook. Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance, 27(2), 267–316. Segal, I. R., & Whinston, M. D. (2000). Naked exclusion: Comment. American Economic Review, 90(1), 296–309. Shapiro, C. (2018). Antitrust in a time of populism. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 61, 714–748. Shapiro, C. (2019). Protecting competition in the American economy: Merger control, tech titans, labor markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(3), 69–93. Shapiro, C. (2021). Vertical mergers and input foreclosure lessons from the AT &T/Time warner case. Review of Industrial Organization, 59(2), 303–341. Shcherbakov, O. (2016). Measuring consumer switching costs in the television industry. The RAND Jour- nal of Economics, 47(2), 366–393. Shum, M. (2004). Does advertising overcome brand loyalty? Evidence from the breakfast-cereals market. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 13(2), 241–272. Singer, H. (2023). The new merger guidelines offer an important course correction on merger enforce- ment. The Sling, Economic Analysis and Competition Policy Research, February 2023. Sixty-Third Congress. (1914). Clayton Act. Sees. II., Ch. 323, Available at https://govtrackus.s3.amazo naws.com/legislink/pdf/stat/38/STATUTE-38-Pg730.pdf (Accessed January 11, 2024). Spengler, J. J. (1950). Vertical integration and antitrust policy. Journal of political economy, 58(4), 347–352. Sullivan, S. P. (2016). What structural presumption: Reuniting evidence and economics on the role of market concentration in horizontal merger analysis. Journal of Corporation Law, 42, 403. Tamayo, J. A., & Tan, G. (2021). Competitive two-part tariffs. Harvard Business School. Topkis, D. M. (1998). Supermodularity and complementarity. Princeton University Press. United States and Plaintiff States v. JetBlue Airways Corporation and Spirit Airlines, Inc. (2024). District Court of Massachusetts. Case 1:23-cv-10511-WGY, Document 461, Filed 01/16/24. Available at: https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/JetBlue%20Spirit.pdf (Accessed January 18, 2024). United States of America et al. v. Google LLC. (2020). Case Number: 1:20-cv-03010. District Of Colum- bia District Court, Filed: 10/20/2020. United States v. Bertelsmann Se & Co. Kgaa, Penguin Random House, Llc, Viacomcbs, Inc., and Simon & Schuster, Inc. (2022). District Court for the District Of Columbia. Case 1:21-cv-02886-FYP Document 194 Filed 11/07/22. Available at: https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/file/15499 41/download (Accessed January 11, 2024). United States v. Sabre Corporation, Sabre Glbl Inc., Farelogix, Inc., and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. (2019). District Court for the District Of Delaware. Case 1:99-mc-09999, Document 1310, Filed 08/20/19. Available at: https://www.justice.gov/media/1022536/dl (Accessed January 11, 2024). U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. (2010). Horizontal Merger Guidelines. Available online (accessed on February 8, 2022): https://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/ hmg-2010.pdf. U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. (2020). Vertical Merger Guidelines. Available online (accessed on February 8, 2022): https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/ reports/us-department-justice-federal-trade-commission-vertical-merger-guidelines/vertical_merger_guidelines_6-30-20.pdf. U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. (2023). Merger Guidelines. Issued: December 18, 2023, available online (accessed December 18, 2023): https://www.ftc.gov/system/ files/ftc_gov/pdf/2023_merger_guidelines_final_12.18.2023.pdf. U.S. Department of Justice v. Agri Stats Inc. (2023). United States District Court For The District Of Minnesota. Civil Action. CASE 0:23-cv-03009 Doc. 1. Filed 09/28/23. Villas-Boas, S. B. (2007). Vertical relationships between manufacturers and retailers: Inference with limited data. The Review of Economic Studies, 74(2), 625–652. Waldfogel, J. (2024). Amazon self-preferencing in the shadow of the digital markets act. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 32299. Wang, J.-C., Lau, A.H.-L., & Lau, H.-S. (2012). Practical and effective contracts for the dominant retailer of a newsvendor product with price-sensitive demand. International Journal of Production Eco- nomics, 138(1), 46–54. Weise, K., Metz, C., Grant, N., & Isaac, M. (2023). Inside the A.I. arms race that changed silicon valley forever. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/05/technology/ai- chatgpt-google-meta.html (Accessed on February 8, 2022). Werden, G. J. (2012). Why (Ever) define markets: An answer to Professor Kaplow. Antitrust LJ, 78, 729. Williamson, O. E. (1968). Economies as an antitrust defense: Correction and reply. The American Economic Review, 58(5), 1372–1376. Wollmann, T. G. (2019). Stealth consolidation: Evidence from an amendment to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. American Economic Review: Insights, 1(1), 77–94. Wollmann, T. G. (2020). How to get away with merger: Stealth consolidation and its effects on us health- care. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. w27274. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/121615 |