Формирование отечественных сетей добавленной стоимости

Polterovich, Victor (2024): Формирование отечественных сетей добавленной стоимости.

Abstract

The concept of the VAN- consortium is introduced. It is a consortium, distinguished by two specific features. Firstly, it includes a group of enterprises that carry out successive stages of production of one or more products. Secondly, the tasks of a VAN- consortium include the development and implementation of projects for the creation and/or implementation of new technologies intended for use in its network, including by enterprises from various sectors of the national economy. Therefore, it should iincorporate organizations capable of performing such tasks, possibly with the involvement of temporary participants - research and project institutes. Members of the consortium retain their independence. Coordination of their activities is carried out by a coordination council formed from their representatives. Real examples show that consortia of this type are capable of ensuring the formation and functioning of domestic value-added networks (VANs). Such networks are necessary for the technological development of a country under severe sanctions pressure. The creation of VAN-consortia could become an important element of indicative plans, and government support would contribute to the development of the VAN-consortium as a collaborative institution.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Formation of domestic value-added networks
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: consortium, sanctions, trust, technological development, indicative plan
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O25 - Industrial Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P21 - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

References

Абрамов И. В., Лукина Ю. Д., Абрамов В. И. (2022). Обеспечение развития аддитивных технологий в России в условиях санкций. // Russian Economic Bulletin. Т. 5. № 4, 198-204

Владимирова И. Г. (1999). Организационные формы интеграции компаний. Менеджмент в России и за рубежом. № 6. https://www.cfin.ru/press/management/1999-6/13.shtml.

Дементьев В.Е. (2023). Технологический суверенитет и приоритеты локализации производства. Terra Economicus 21(1), 6–18.

Дементьев В.Е., Устюжанина Е.В. (2023). Институциональные условия адаптации цепочек создания стоимости к краткосрочным и долгосрочным испытаниям // Российский экономический журнал. № 6. С. 17–31. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.52210/0130-9757_2023_6_17.

Евстафьева Ю. В. (2019). К становлению научно-технологических консорциумов в российской экономике. Российский экономический журнал. № 6, 34–51.

Матвиенко Д.Ю. (2012). Формы интеграционных объединений компаний // Современная конкуренция. № 6, 9–16.

Михалец В.Б., И.В. Радин и др. (2021). Современные тенденции построения научных консорциумов. Инновации №7, 18-23.

Овчинникова А.В. , Тополева Т.Н. (2021). Научно-образовательные консорциумы: сбалансированное развитие науки и высшей школы в условиях неоэкономики Вестник НГИЭИ. Т.124. №9. С.80-96.

Полтерович В. М. (2016). Институты догоняющего развития (к проекту новой модели экономического развития России). Экон. и соц. перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. Вып. 5.

Полтерович В. М. (2022). Еще раз о том, куда идти: к стратегии развития в условиях изоляции от Запада // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 3 (55). С. 238–244. См. также расширенную версию: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/113807/1/MPRA_paper_113807.pdf

Полтерович В.М. (2023). Догоняющее развитие в условиях санкций: стратегия позитивного сотрудничества. Terra Economicus 21(3), 6-16.

Полтерович В. М. (2024). Экономический рост в условиях санкций: стратегия позитивного сотрудничества и экономика полного отечественного цикла. В сб.: Системное моделирование социально-экономических процессов: труды 46-ой Международной научной школы-семинара, г. Уфа, 9 – 15 октября 2023 г. / под ред. д-ра экон. наук И.Н. Щепиной. – Воронеж : издательство «Истоки». С.50-55

Рекимчук В. М. (2023). Мировой анализ рынка и прогноз развития аддитивного производства. Industry. https://industry3d.ru/at-news/mirovoy-analiz-rynka-i-prognozrazvitiya-additivnogo-proizvodstva/

Сацкая З (2023). АТ на пороге квантового скачка? Аддитивные технологии. №1, 7-8.

Стратегия развития аддитивных технологий в Российской Федерации на период до 2030 года. Утверждена распоряжением Правительства РФ от 14 июля 2021 г. N 1913-р (2021). https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/401404208/

Университетские консорциумы (2021). Обзор практик российских университетов №6 / апрель. 13 с. https://globaluni.ru/uploads/media/default/0001/01/4f4c209b382ebeae5502cd6adf772d5eef437c0f/Uni_practice_06.pdf

Attaran M. (2017). The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing. Business horizon, Vol. 1, 1-12.

Bauer P.C. (2021). Clearing the jungle: conceptualizing trust and trustworthiness. In: De Freitas, B. and S. Lo Iacono (eds.) Trust matters: cross-disciplinary essays. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2325989

Crowe D. and L. Rawdanowicz (2023). Risks and opportunities of reshaping global value chains, OECD Economics Working Paper Series, Vol. 1762.

Dell’Era, C., Trabucchi, D., and Magistretti, S. (2020), "Exploiting Incumbents’ Potentialities: From Linear Value Chains To Multi-Sided Platforms", Cretivity and Innovation Management, Vol. aheadof-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12413

de Vries, J. R., Turner, J. A., Finlay-Smits, S., Ryan, A., and Klerkx, L. (2023). Trust in agri-food value chains: a systematic review. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review Volume 26, Issue 2; DOI: 10.22434/IFAMR2022.

DiVito, L., van Wijk, J., & Wakkee, I. (2021). Governing collaborative value creation in the context of grand challenges: A case study of a crosssectoral collaboration in the textile industry. Business & Society, 60(5), 1092–1131.

Eisner A. B., N. Rahman, H. J. Korn (2009). Formation conditions, innovation, and learning in R&D consortia//Management Decision. Vol. 47. № 6, 851-871.

Ejewule, E., Olaniyan, O. S., & Hamadi, S. (2020). Assessment of effect of the consortium approach to food value chain development on the production and income of smallholder farmers in Tanzania. African Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 21–48.

Fonti, F., Maoret, M., & Whitbred, R. (2017). Free‐riding in multi‐party alliances: The role of perceived alliance effectiveness and peers' collaboration in a research consortium. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 363-383.

Galantucci L.M., Guerra M.G., Dassisti M., Lavecchia F. (2019). Additive Manufacturing: New Trends in the 4th Industrial Revolution. In: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 153–169.

Gausdal Anne Haugen, Helge Svare & Guido Möllering (2016). Why don’t all high-trust networks achieve strong network benefits? A case-based exploration of cooperation in Norwegian SME networks, Journal of Trust Research, 6:2, 194-212, DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2016.1213173

Grohmann P., Dietze V., Krämer C. and Feindt P.H. (2023) Governance and trust in sustainability-based agri-food value chains. A comparative analysis of five cases in Germany. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 7:1130895. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1130895

Jiang, W.; Tang, S. (2023).The Cooperation Establishment Mechanism of EPC Project Consortium in Context of China: Form the Perspective of Trust. Sustainability, 15, 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021266

Kannisto P., D. Hästbacka, A. Marttinen (2018). Information Exchange Architecture for Collaborative Industrial Ecosystem, Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 22, pp. 655–670. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9877-0

Kherrazi, S. (2023). Exploring taxonomies and governance challenges of sponsored R&D consortia: Evidence from the EU framework program. Journal of Innovation Economics and Management, 41(2), 217-249.

Morrison, M., Mourby, M., Gowans, H., Coy, S., and Kaye, J. (2020). Governance of research consortia: challenges of implementing Responsible Research and Innovation within Europe. In: Life Sciences, Society and Policy 16:9. doi: 10.1186/s40504-020-00109-z

Parthiban, K.T.; Fernandaz, C.C.; Sudhagar, R.J.; Sekar, I.; Kanna, S.U.; Rajendran, P.; Devanand, P.S.; Vennila, S.; Kumar, N.K. (2021). Industrial Agroforestry—A Sustainable Value Chain Innovation through a Consortium Approach. Sustainability, 13, 7126. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su13137126 !!!

Parthiban, K.T.. Sudhagar, R.J., Fernandaz, C.C., Krishnakumar, N. (2019).Consortium of Industrial Agroforestry: An institutional mechanism for sustaining agroforestry in India. Curr. Sci. 117, 30–36. [CrossRef]

Patterson, J., Forker, L. and Hanna, J. (1999). Supply Chain Consortia: the Rise of Transcendental buyer-suppler relationships. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 5, pp. 85-93.

Stern, M. J., and Coleman, K. J. (2015). The multidimensionality of trust: applications in collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 28(2), 117–132, 117–132.

Todeva E., Knoke D. (2005). Strategic alliances and models of collaboration. Management Decision, 43: 123-148.

Xia M., Zhao K., and Mahoney J.T. (2012). Enhancing value via cooperation: Firms’ process benefits from participation in a standard consortium. Industrial and Corporate Change 21(3), 699–72.