Janischewski, Anja and Bohnenberger, Katharina and Kranke, Matthias and Vogel, Tobias and Driouich, Riwan and Froese, Tobias and Gerold, Stefanie and Kaufmann, Raphael and Keyßer, Lorenz and Niethammer, Jannis and Olk, Christopher and Schmelzer, Matthias and Yürük, Aslı and Lange, Steffen (2024): It depends: Varieties of defining growth dependence.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_121787.pdf Download (723kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Many socio-economic systems require positive economic growth rates to function properly. Given uncertainty about future growth rates and increasing evidence that economic growth is a driver of social and environmental crises, these growth dependencies pose serious societal challenges. In recent years, more and more researchers have thus tried to identify growth-dependent systems and develop policies to reduce their growth dependence. However, the concept of “growth dependence” still lacks a consistent definition and operationalization, which impedes more systematic empirical and theoretical research. This article proposes a simple but powerful framework for defining and operationalizing the concept of “growth dependence” across socio-economic systems. We provide a general definition consisting of four components that can be specified for different empirical cases: (1) the system under investigation, (2) the unit of measurement of growth, (3) the level of growth and (4) the relevant functions or properties of the system under investigation. According to our general definition, a socio-economic system is growth-dependent if it requires a long-term positive growth rate in terms of a unit of economic measurement to maintain all its functions or properties that are relevant within the chosen normative framework. To illustrate the usefulness of our scheme, we apply it to three areas at the heart of the existing literature on growth dependence: employment, social insurance systems and public finance. These case studies demonstrate that whether or not a system is growth-dependent hinges not only on the empirical properties of the system itself but also on the specification of the concept of growth dependence. Our framework enables coherent, robust and effective definitions and research questions, fostering comparability of findings across different cases and disciplines. Better research can lead to better policies for reducing growth dependence and thus achieving stable and sustainable economies.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | It depends: Varieties of defining growth dependence |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | growth dependence, growth independence, post-growth, green growth, degrowth, growth imperative |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O44 - Environment and Growth Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development |
Item ID: | 121787 |
Depositing User: | Anja Janischewski |
Date Deposited: | 01 Oct 2024 13:25 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2024 13:25 |
References: | Alcott, B. (2013). Should degrowth embrace the Job Guarantee? Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.007 Aronoff, K., Battistoni, A., Cohen, D. A., & Riofrancos, T. (2019). A planet to win: why we need a Green New Deal. Verso. Antal, M. (2014). Green goals and full employment: Are they compatible? Ecological Economics, 107, 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.014 Ball, L., Leigh, D., & Loungani, P. (2017). Okun’s Law: Fit at 50? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 49(7), 1413–1441. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12420 Baccaro, L., & Hadziabdic, S. (2024). Operationalizing growth models. Quality & Quantity, 58(2), 1325–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01685-w Bassanini, A., & Scarpetta, S. (2001). The driving forces of economic growth: Panel data evidence for the OECD countries. 9–56. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/eco_studies-v2001-art10-en Binswanger, H.-C. (2006). Die Wachstumsspirale. Geld, Energie und Imagination in der Dynamik des Marktprozesses. Metropolis. Binswanger, M. (2019). Der Wachstumszwang. Warum die Volkswirtschaft immer weiter wachsen muss, selbst wenn wir genug haben. Wiley. Bohnenberger, K., & Fritz, M. (2020). Making welfare resilient: Creating stable & sustainable welfare systems in times of declining economic growth (Transformation Policy Brief #2). ZOE-Institute for future-fit economies. Bohnenberger, K. (2023). Peaks and gaps in eco-social policy and sustainable welfare: A systematic literature map of the research landscape. European Journal of Social Security, 25(4), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627231214546 Büchs, M. (2021). Sustainable welfare: Independence between growth and welfare has to go both ways. Global Social Policy, 21(2), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181211019153 Büchs, M., & Koch, M. (2019). Challenges for the degrowth transition: The debate about wellbeing. Futures, 105, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.09.002 Campante, F., Sturzenegger, F., & Velasco, A. (2021). Advanced Macroeconomics: An Easy Guide. LSE Press. https://doi.org/10.31389/lsepress.ame Christophers, B. (2011). Making finance productive. Economy and Society, 40(1), 112–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2011.529337 Clegg, D. (2018). Central European welfare states. In B. Greve (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State (2nd edition, pp. 137–147). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207049 Conteh, K. (2021). Economic Growth and Unemployment: An Empirical Assessment of Okun’s Law in the Case of Liberia (2001-2019). Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.7176/JESD/12-14-13 Corlet Walker, C., Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2021). Welfare systems without economic growth: A review of the challenges and next steps for the field. Ecological Economics, 186, 107066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107066 Corlet Walker, C., Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2024). Growth dependency in the welfare state – An analysis of drivers in the UK’s adult social care sector and proposals for change. Ecological Economics, 220, 108159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108159 Corlet Walker, C., & Jackson, T. (2021). Tackling growth dependency - the case of adult social care. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15846.70726 Costanza, R. (2022). Addicted to Growth: Societal Therapy for a Sustainable Wellbeing Future (1st edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003173717 Daly, H. (2019). Growthism: Its ecological, economic and ethical limits. real-world economics review, 87, 9–22. Douthwaite, R. J. (1993). The growth illusion: How economic growth has enriched the few, impoverished the many, and endangered the planet (U.S. ed). Council Oak Books. Elder-Vass, D. (2007). Luhmann and Emergentism: Competing Paradigms for Social Systems Theory? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37(4), 408–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393107307660 European Environment Agency. (2021). Reflecting on green growth: creating a resilient economy within environmental limits. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2800/00936 Fanning, A. L., O’Neill, D. W., & Büchs, M. (2020). Provisioning systems for a good life within planetary boundaries. Global Environmental Change, 64, 102135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102135 Felber, C. (2015). Change Everything: Creating an Economy for the Common Good. Zed Books. Frayne, D. (2015). The Refusal of Work: The Theory and Practice of Resistance to Work. Zed Books. Garland, D. (2014). The Welfare State: A Fundamental Dimension of Modern Government. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 55(3), 327–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975614000162 Gebauer, J. (2018). Towards Growth-Independent and Post-Growth-Oriented Entrepreneurship in the SME Sector. Management Revue, 29(3), 230–256. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2018-3-230 Gough, I. (2019). Universal Basic Services: A Theoretical and Moral Framework. The Political Quarterly, 90(3), 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12706 Gumbert, T., Mamut, P., Fuchs, D., & Welck, T. (2022). Sustainable consumption and the power of economic growth: exploring alternatives to the growth-dependency narrative. Consumption and Society, 1(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1332/JPPD7512 Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Plank, B., Brockway, P., Fishman, T., Hausknost, D., Krausmann, F., Leon-Gruchalski, B., Mayer, A., Pichler, M., Schaffartzik, A., Sousa, T., Streeck, J., & Creutzig, F. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 065003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a Hickel, J. (2021). What does degrowth mean? A few points of clarification. Globalizations, 18(7), 1105–1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222 Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is Green Growth Possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964 Hirvilammi, T. (2020). The Virtuous Circle of Sustainable Welfare as a Transformative Policy Idea. Sustainability, 12(1), 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010391 Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What Are Institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879 Höpflinger, F. (2010). Alterssicherungssysteme: Doppelte Herausforderung von demographischer Alterung und Postwachstum. In: I. Seidl & A. Zahrnt (Eds.), Postwachstumsgesellschaft: Konzepte für die Zukunft (pp. 53–63). Metropolis-Verlag. Jackson, T. (2016). Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow (2nd edition). Routledge. Jackson, T. (2018). The post-growth challenge: Secular stagnation, inequality and the limits to growth (CUSP Working Paper No 12). University of Surrey. www.cusp.ac.uk/publications Jackson, T., & Victor, P. (2011). Productivity and work in the “green economy”: Some theoretical reflections and empirical tests. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.005 Jackson, T., & Victor, P. A. (2016). Does slow growth lead to rising inequality? Some theoretical reflections and numerical simulations. Ecological Economics, 121, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.019 Janischewski, A. (2022). Inequality, non-linear consumption behaviour, and monetary growth imperatives. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies Intervention, 19(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2022.01.06 Kallis, G., Kalush, M., O.’Flynn, H., Rossiter, J., & Ashford, N. (2013). “Friday off”: Reducing Working Hours in Europe. Sustainability, 5(4), 1545–1567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5041545 Kettner, M., & Vogel, T. (2021). Sachzwänge in der kapitalistischen Ökonomie. Ihre Strukturen und Ambivalenzen. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschafts- Und Unternehmensethik, 22(2), 287–311. Koch, M. (2022). Social Policy Without Growth: Moving Towards Sustainable Welfare States. Social Policy and Society, 21(3), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000361 Kohler, K., & Stockhammer, E. (2022). Growing differently? Financial cycles, austerity, and competitiveness in growth models since the Global Financial Crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 29(4), 1314–1341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2021.1899035 Köppl, A., & Schratzenstaller, M. (2021). An Employment-Friendly Tax System. In I. Seidl & A. Zahrnt (Eds.), Post-Growth Work: Employment and Meaningful Activities within Planetary Boundaries (pp. 160–175). Routledge. Lamb, W., & Steinberger, J. (2017). Human well-being and climate change mitigation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(6), e485. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.485 Landefeld, J. S., Seskin, E. P., & Fraumeni, B. M. (2008). Taking the Pulse of the Economy: Measuring GDP. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.193 Likaj, X., Jacobs, M., & Fricke, T. (2022). Growth, Degrowth or Post-growth? Towards a synthetic understanding of the growth debate (Research Report No. 02/2022). Basic Papers. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/281436 Kockaert, H. J., & Steurs, F. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of terminology (Vol. 1). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://www.benjamins.com/catalog/hot Lange, S. (2018). Macroeconomics Without Growth: Sustainable Economies in Neoclassical, Keynesian and Marxian Theories. Metropolis-Verlag. Lange, S. (2022). Digitalization and Growth Independence: Utilizing Technologies for Environmental and Economic Resilience. ECDF Working Paper Series #004. https://doi.org/10.14279/DEPOSITONCE-16550 Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford University Press. Malmaeus, J. M., & Alfredsson, E. C. (2017). Potential Consequences on the Economy of Low or No Growth - Short and Long Term Perspectives. Ecological Economics, 134, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.011 Mayer, H., Tschumi, P., Perren, R., Seidl, I., Winiger, A., & Wirth, S. (2021). How do social innovations contribute to growth-independent territorial development? Case studies from a Swiss mountain region. Die Erde, 218–231. https://doi.org/10.12854/erde-2021-592 Mayer, J. (2017). How Could the South Respond to Secular Stagnation in the North? The World Economy, 40(2), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12389 Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea green publishing. Mele, C., Pels, J., & Polese, F. (2010). A Brief Review of Systems Theories and Their Managerial Applications. Service Science, 2(1–2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2.1_2.126 Morel, N., & Palme, J. (2018). Financing the welfare state and the politics of taxation. In B. Greve (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State (2nd edition, pp. 467–476). Oberholzer, B. (2023). Post-growth transition, working time reduction, and the question of profits. Ecological Economics, 206, 107748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107748 Obinger, H. (2021). Social Expenditure and Welfare State Financing. In D. Béland, S. Leibfried, K. J. Morgan, H. Obinger, & C. Pierson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State (2nd edition, pp. 453–472). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198828389.013.26 Olk, C., Schneider, C., & Hickel, J. (2023). How to pay for saving the world: Modern Monetary Theory for a degrowth transition. Ecological Economics, 214, 107968, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107968 O’Neill, D. W. (2012). Measuring progress in the degrowth transition to a steady state economy. Ecological Economics, 84, 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.020 Ostrom, E. (1986). An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice, 48(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239556 Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau. Pasche, M. (2018, May 30). Degrowth and sustainable public finance [MPRA Paper]. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/87109/ Petschow, U., Lange, S., Hofmann, D., Pissarskoi, E., & dem Moore, N. (2020). Social well-being within planetary boundaries: The precautionary post-growth approach (TEXTE 234/2020). Umweltbundesamt. Pettifor, A. (2019). The Case for the Green New Deal. Verso Books. Pollin, R. (2019). Advancing a Viable Global Climate Stabilization Project: Degrowth versus the Green New Deal. Review of Radical Political Economics, 51(2), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613419833518 Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Random House Business. Richters, O., & Siemoneit, A. (2019). Growth imperatives: Substantiating a contested concept. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 51, 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.07.012 Robeyns, I. (2017). Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined. Open Book Publishers. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. Roosma, F., Gelissen, J., & van Oorschot, W. (2013). The Multidimensionality of Welfare State Attitudes: A European Cross-National Study. Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0099-4 Rosa, H. (2012). Beschleunigung. Die Veränderung der Zeitstrukturen in der Moderne (9th edition). Suhrkamp Verlag. Rosa, H. (2016). Resonanz: Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Suhrkamp Verlag. Rosa, H., Dörre, K., & Lessenich, S. (2017). Appropriation, Activation and Acceleration: The Escalatory Logics of Capitalist Modernity and the Crises of Dynamic Stabilization. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416657600 Rothgang, H. (2010). Social Insurance for Long-term Care: An Evaluation of the German Model. Social Policy & Administration, 44(4), 436–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00722.x Rydin, Y. (2013). The future of planning: Beyond growth dependence. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgwg6 Salama, J. (2023). Financing the post-growth state. Degrowth Journal, 1. https://www.degrowthjournal.org/publications/2023-10-18-financing-the-post-growth-state/ Schmelzer, M. (2015). The growth paradigm: History, hegemony, and the contested making of economic growthmanship. Ecological Economics, 118, 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.029 Schmelzer, M., Vetter, A., & Vansintjan, A. (2022). The Future is Degrowth: A Guide to a World beyond Capitalism. Verso. Schmid, B. (2021). Spatial strategies for a post-growth transformation. In B. Lange, M. Hülz, B. Schmid, & C. Schulz (Eds.), Post-Growth Geographies (pp. 61–83). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839457337-005 Seidl, I., & Zahrnt, A. (Eds.) (2010). Postwachstumsgesellschaft: Konzepte für die Zukunft. Vol. 87. Metropolis-Verlag. Semieniuk, G. (2024). Inconsistent definitions of GDP: Implications for estimates of decoupling. Ecological Economics, 215, 108000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108000 Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513 Sögner, L., & Stiassny, A. (2002). An analysis on the structural stability of Okun’s law--a cross-country study. Applied Economics, 34(14), 1775–1787. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840210124180 Strunz, S., & Schindler, H. (2018). Identifying Barriers Toward a Post-growth Economy – A Political Economy View. Ecological Economics, 153, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.06.017 Studer, H.-P. (2010). Gesundheitswesen als kosteneffizientes Solidarsystem mit Eigenverantwortung. In: I. Seidl & A. Zahrnt (2010), Postwachstumsgesellschaft: Konzepte für die Zukunft (Vol. 87, pp. 65–75). Metropolis-Verlag. Tan, E. C., & Tang, C. F. (2013). The Extent of Growth Dependence of Selected East Asian Economies on the USA. Global Economic Review, 42(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2013.769802 Teulings, C., & Baldwin, R. (Eds) (2014). Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes and Cures. CEPR Press. Tokic, D. (2012). The economic and financial dimensions of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 84, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.011 Trebeck, K., & Williams, J. (2019). The economics of arrival: Ideas for a grown-up economy. Policy Press. Tschumi, P., Winiger, A., Wirth, S., Mayer, H., & Seidl, I. (2021). Growth independence through social innovations? An analysis of potential growth effects of social innovations in a Swiss mountain region. In B. Lange, M. Hülz, B. Schmid, & C. Schulz (Eds.), Post-growth geographies: Spatial relations of diverse and alternative economies (Vol. 49, pp. 113–135). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. DOI: 10.14361/9783839457337-009 van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2017). A third option for climate policy within potential limits to growth. Nature Climate Change, 7(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3113 Vogel, J., Guerin, G., O’Neill, D. W., & Steinberger, J. K. (2024). Safeguarding livelihoods against reductions in economic output. Ecological Economics, 215, 107977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107977 Wagner, J., & Lange, S. (2021). Towards Digital Growth-Independent Societies. Ökologisches Wirtschaften, 36(O1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.14512/OEWO360144 Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (2019). Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing (6th edition). Pearson. Weeks, K. (2011). The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries. Duke University Press. Wiman, L. (2024). Are pensions “growth-dependent”? Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 20(1), 2372874. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2024.2372874 Wulfgramm, M., & Starke, P. (2016). Divided by the Market, Divided by the State: Distribution, Redistribution and Welfare Attitudes in 47 Countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 40(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12078 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/121787 |