Aristovnik, Aleksander and Berčič, Boštjan (2007): Fiscal Sustainability in Selected Transition Countries. Published in: Journal of Economics , Vol. 55, No. 7 (2007): pp. 659-675.
Download (274kB) | Preview
In the article, we review recent literature on fiscal sustainability with particular reference to problems that are specific to transition countries. While the original literature on fiscal sustainability is chiefly focused on industrial countries there are by now few works that have focused on fiscal sustainability in transition countries. Consequently, the article’s purpose is to assess the short-, medium- and long-term sustainability of fiscal policy (under set assumptions) on the national level in the great majority of transition countries which we divide into three main groups, i.e. Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), Southern and Eastern Europe (SEE) and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Based on simple mainstream theory measures of fiscal sustainability, the results indicate that fiscal sustainability seems to be a problem in many transition countries, particularly in CEE (e.g. Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland) and the SEE region (e.g. Albania and Croatia).
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, Slovenia|
|Original Title:||Fiscal Sustainability in Selected Transition Countries|
|Keywords:||transition; public sector; fiscal policy; sustainability; forecasting|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E17 - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H62 - Deficit ; Surplus
H - Public Economics > H0 - General > H00 - General
|Depositing User:||Aleksander Aristovnik|
|Date Deposited:||10. Jan 2007|
|Last Modified:||18. Feb 2013 04:34|
• Alam, A., and Sundberg, M. (2002). ‘A Decade of Fiscal Transition.’ Washington: World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2835. • Bispham, J.A. (1987). ‘Rising public sector indebtedness: Some more unpleasant arithmetic.’ In Boskin, M.J., Flemming, J.S. & Gorini, S. (eds.). 1987. Private saving and public debt, 40-71. • Blanchard, O. (1990). ‘Suggestions for a New Set of Fiscal Indicators.’ Economics Department Working Paper 79. Paris: OECD. • Blanchard O. (1993). ‘Suggestions for a new set of fiscal indicators.’ In Verbon, H.A.A. & Van Winden, F.A.A.M. (eds). (1993). The political economy of government debt, 307:25. • Budina, N., and van Wijnbergen, S. (1997). ‘Fiscal Policies in Eastern Europe.’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 13 , No. 2. • Buiter, W. (1983), ‘Measurement of the Public Sector Deficit and its Implications for Policy Evaluation and Design.’ In International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 30, June 1983, pp. 306-49. • Buiter, W. (1985). ‘Guide to Public Sector Debt and Deficits.’ Economic Policy: A European Forum 1: 13-79. • Buiter, W. (1996). ‘Aspects of fiscal performance in some transition economies under Fund-supported programmes.’ Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion paper, no. 1535. • Croce, E., and Juan-Ramon, H. (2003). ‘Assessing Sustainability: A Cross-Country Comparison.’ IMF Working Paper 03/145. Washington, DC, United States: International Monetary Fund. • Convergence Report (2004, 2005). European Central Bank: Frankfurt. • Economic Survey of Europe (2000). Geneva: UN Economic Commission for Europe, 2000. • Economist Intelligence Unit (2005). London: The Economist. [URL: http://www.eiu.com], 14. 12. 2005. • Eurostat (2006). Brussels: European Commission. [URL:http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int/portal/page?_pageid=1090,30070682,1090_33076576&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL], 10.12.2005. • Fanizza, D., and Mourmouras, A. (1994). ‘Fiscal indicators.’ Seminar on Fiscal Policy Management in Economies in Transition (Lecture No. 16) – 7-18 November. Washington D.C.: Fiscal Affairs Department and IMF Institute, International Monetary Fund. • Gonzalez-Paramo, J.M., Rolàn, J.M., and Sebastian, M. (1992). ‘Issues on fiscal policy in Spain.’ In Bank for International Settlements. 1992. Current issues in fiscal policy and their implications for the conduct of monetary policy: 189-220. • Green, C. J., Holmes, M. J., and Kowalski, T. (2000). Poland: A Successful Transition to Budget Sustainability?, Economic Research paper No. 00/5, Loughborough University. • Hemming, R., and MacKenzie, G.A. (1991). ‘Public expenditure and sustainable fiscal policy.’ In Chu, K. & Hemming, R. 1991. Public expenditure handbook: 7-13. • International Financial Statistics (2005). Washington: IMF. • International Monetary Fund (2002). ‘Assessing Sustainability.’ Policy paper prepared by the Policy Review and Development Department, Washington: IMF. • McGettigan, D. (2000). ‘Current Account and External Sustainability in the Baltics, Russia, and Other Countries of the Former Soviet Union.’ IMF Occasional Paper, No. 189. • Pasinetti, L. L. (1998). ‘The Myth (or Folly) of the 3% Deficits/GDP Maastricht “parameter”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22: 103-16. • Roux, A. (1993). ‘The public debt: A medium-term perspective.’ The South African Journal of Economics, 61(4): 324-33. • Tanzi, V. (1999). ‘Transition and the Changing Role of Government.’ Finance and Development, Washington: IMF, Vol. 36: • Transition Report (2006). London: EBRD. • Wickens, M. (1992). Fiscal Indicators. Pretoria: Department of Finance, Unit of Fiscal Analysis and Policy planning.