Josué, ANDRIANADY and RAVELOSON, Rojo Armel (2024): L’environnement du point de vue des économistes.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_122266.pdf Download (271kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This manual offers a comprehensive overview of key economic theories applied to environmental issues. It covers classical views of nature as a resource, externalities theory, and critiques of the "Tragedy of the Commons" by Hardin and Ostrom. Behavioral economics concepts, such as status quo bias and nudging, are examined in environmental decision-making. The manual also discusses environmental justice, focusing on the North-South divide and its historical and structural causes. Finally, it explores the transition to a sustainable economy, addressing green growth, post-growth, and climate change challenges.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | L’environnement du point de vue des économistes |
English Title: | The Environment from the Economists' Perspective: A Literature Review |
Language: | French |
Keywords: | Environmental Economics Sustainable Development Natural Resources Market Failure Externalities Public Goods Climate Change Economic Policy Resource Management Economic Theory Welfare Economics Ecological Economics Environmental Justice Cost-Benefit Analysis Biodiversity Conservation |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals N - Economic History > N0 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification |
Item ID: | 122266 |
Depositing User: | Mr Josué Ravahiny ANDRIANADY |
Date Deposited: | 04 Oct 2024 17:14 |
Last Modified: | 04 Oct 2024 17:14 |
References: | 1. Anatolii, K. et al. (2023). “Non-economic determinants of social and labor development– 21st Century.” *Journal of Social Development Studies*. 2. Arthur, W.B. (2016). “Learning and Adaptive Economic Behavior: Designing Economic Agents that Act Like Human Agents: A Behavioral Approach to Bounded Rationality.” 3. Bernard, K. et al. (2024). “Power, control, strain: Lay perceptions of health inequalities across England’s North-South divide.” *Journal of Public Health*. 4. Brunnhuber, S. (2022). “The Real Tragedy of the Commons – Garrett Hardin (1968) Revised.” *Problemy Ekorozwoju*. doi : 10.35784/pe.2022.2.02. 5. Campbell, B. et al. (2024). “Characterising a diversity of coastal community fisheries in Kiribati and Vanuatu.” *Journal of Environmental Management*. 6. Cadoret, I., Galli, E., Padovano, F. (2021). “Environmental Taxation: Pigouvian or Leviathan?” doi : 10.1007/S40812-020-00149-8. 7. Coase, R. (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost.” *Journal of Law and Econometrics*, vol. 3, pp. 1-44, University of Chicago Press. 8. Daly, H. (1996). *Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development*. Beacon Press. 9. David, B. & Johnson, J. (1973). “Meade, Bees, and Externalities.” *The Journal of Law and Economics*, vol. 16, no. 4. doi: 10.1086/466754. 10. Deryugina, T., Moore, F. C., & Tol, R. S. J. (2021). “Environmental Applications of the Coase Theorem.” *Environmental Science & Policy*. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2021.03.001. 11. Filipe, M. (2023). “Mercantilism.” doi: 10.4324/9781003228097-3. 12. Field, B. C., & Field, M. K. (2017). *Environmental Economics: An Introduction* (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. 13. Hardin, G. (1968). “The Tragedy of the Commons.” *Science*, vol. 162, pp. 1243-1248. 14. Jellason, N. P. (2024). “Climate change: challenges and responses for business.” *Handbook of Energy and Environment in the 21st Century*. 15. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” *Econometrica*, vol. 47, pp. 263-291. 16. Karpoff, J. M. (2022). “The Tragedy of ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’: Hardin versus the Property Rights Theorists.” *The Journal of Law and Economics*. doi: 10.1086/718857. 17. Kobeissi, Z., Mazari-Fouquer, I., Ruiz-Balet, D. (2023). “The Tragedy of the Commons: A Mean-Field Game Approach to the Reversal of Travelling Waves.” 18. Lindon, V. M. et al. (2023). “Behavioral Economics in Public Policy in the Age of Covid-19: A Systematic Review.” *Behavioral Public Policy*. 19. Lord, C. J. (2011). “Polecats, lions, and foxes: Coasian bargaining theory and attempts to legitimate the Union as a constrained form of political power.” *European Political Science Review*. doi: 10.1017/S1755773910000275. 20. Malthus, R. (1798). *An Essay on the Principle of Population*. J. Johnson, London. 21. Meo, S. A. & Meo, A. S. (2024). “Climate Change and Diabetes Mellitus - Emerging Global Public Health Crisis: Observational Analysis.” *Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Online*. 22. Mulligan, C. B. (2023). “Beyond Pigou: Externalities and Civil Society in the Supply-Demand Framework.” *Economic Studies Quarterly*. 23. Ostrom, E. (1990). *Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action*. Cambridge University Press. 24. Pagano, U., & Vatiero, M. (2015). “Costly institutions as substitutes: novelty and limits of the Coasian approach.” *Journal of Institutional Economics*. doi: 10.1017/S1744137414000198. 25. Pigou, A. C. (1920). *The Economics of Welfare*. Macmillan, Londres. 26. Ricardo, D. (1817). *Principes de l’économie politique et de l’impôt*. 27. Roberts, J. T., & Parks, B. C. (2007). *A Climate of Injustice*. MIT Press. 28. Rumbaitis del Rio, C., & Toth, E. (2024). “What’s Next for Global Climate Adaptation in 2024.” *United Nations Foundation*, 17 janvier 2024. 29. Sathya, R., & Gayathir. (2024). “Behavioral Biases in Investment Decisions: An Extensive Literature Review and Pathways for Future Research.” *Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences*. doi: 10.31341/jios.48.1.6. 30. Schlosberg, D. (2007). *Defining Environmental Justice*. Oxford University Press. 31. Schneider, N. (2022). “Internalizing Environmental Externalities and the Coase Theorem.” *World Journal of Applied Economics*. doi: 10.22440/wjae.8.2.4. 32. Smith, A. (1776). *Recherches sur la nature et les causes de la richesse des nations*. 33. Stern, N. (2006). *Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change*. HM Treasury. 34. Sunstein, R. C. (1993). “Endogenous Preferences, Environmental Law.” *The Journal of Legal Studies*. doi: 10.1086/468164. 35. Tan, Q. (2022). “Coase Theorem and its Implication for Environmental Policy.” doi: 10.54691/bcpbm.v29i.2320. 36. Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). *Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness*. Yale University Press. 37. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.” *Science*, vol. 185(4157), pp. 1124-1131. 38. Weber, U. E. (2006). “Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk: Why Global Warming Does Not Scare Us (Yet).” *Climatic Change*. doi: 10.1007/S10584-006-9060-3. 39. Zhu, J. L. (2024). “Behavioral Economics.” *Finance & Economics*. doi: 10.61173/ngh7fq54. 40. “Information Asymetry.” (2023). *Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies*. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-8800-3.ch003. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/122266 |