Party selectors, voters, and the choice of productive representatives under different types of list proportional representation

Däubler, Thomas and Linek, Lukáš (2024): Party selectors, voters, and the choice of productive representatives under different types of list proportional representation.

Abstract

Do party selectors or voters choose more productive politicians? Selectors may promote quality candidates and have an informational advantage over voters, but quality need not be the key criterion for nominations, and voters may be sufficiently informed to correct inferior decisions. We empirically examine whether the type of principal responsible for the selection affects individual parliamentary work (attendance, bills, amendments, questions, speeches). Flexible-list proportional representation systems are both interesting and analytically useful in this context, since seats within parties are first allocated to candidates reaching a certain number of personal votes, while any remaining seats are awarded based on the pre-electoral list rank. This allows us to compare three types of elected candidates: selector-chosen, voter-chosen, and doubly-chosen representatives. Analysing data from the Czech Republic in the period between 2002 and 2021, we find that voters have a stronger preference for candidates with high formal education than selectors. We do not find differences in parliamentary behaviour between selector-chosen and voter-chosen types. The results speak against a potential trade-off between giving voters more influence on within-party seat allocation and the quality of chosen representatives.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: list proportional representation, political selection, ballot structure, preference voting, candidate selection, flexible-list system, parliamentary behaviour
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government

References

André, A., Depauw, S., & Shugart, M.S. (2014). The Effect of Electoral Institutions on Legislative Behaviour. In S. Martin, T. Saalfeld, and K. Strøm (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. 231-249. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bäck, H., Debus, M., & Müller, J. (2014). Who Takes the Parliamentary Floor? The Role of Gender in Speech-making in the Swedish Riksdag. Political Research Quarterly, 67(3), 504-518.

Becher, M., & Menéndez González, I. (2019). Electoral Reform and Trade-Offs in Representation. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 694-709.

Bernecker, A. (2014). Do politicians shirk when reelection is certain? Evidence from the German parliament. European Journal of Political Economy, 36, 55-70.

Besley, T. (2005). Political selection. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 43-60.

Besley, T. (2007). Principled agents?: The political economy of good government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Besley, T., Folke, O., Persson, T., & Rickne, J. (2017). Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man: Theory and evidence from Sweden. American Economic Review, 107(8), 2204-42.

Bouteca, Nicolas, Jef Smulders, Bart Maddens, Carl Devos, and Bram Wauters. 2019. ‘“A Fair Day’s Wage for a Fair Day’s Work”? Exploring the Connection between the Parliamentary Work of MPs and Their Electoral Support’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 25 (1): 44–65.

Bowler, S., McElroy, G., & Müller, S. (2020). Campaigns and the Selection of Policy-Seeking Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 45(3), 397-431.

Braendle, T. (2016). Do institutions affect citizens' selection into politics? Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(2), 205-227.

Buisseret, P., Folke, O., Prato, C., & Rickne, J. (2022). Party nomination strategies in list proportional representation systems. American Journal of Political Science 66(3), 714-729.

Carey, J.M. (2007). Competing principals, political institutions, and party unity in legislative voting American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 92-107.

Carnes, N., & Lupu, N. (2023). The Economic Backgrounds of Politicians. Annual Review of Political Science, 26(1), 253-270.

Carroll, R., & Nalepa, M. (2020). The personal vote and party cohesion: Modeling the effects of electoral rules on intraparty politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 32(1), 36-69.

Caselli, F., & Morelli, M. (2004). Bad politicians. Journal of Public Economics, 88(3-4), 759-782.

Cirone, A., Cox, G.W., & Fiva, J.H. (2021). Seniority-based nominations and political careers. American Political Science Review, 115(1), 234-251.

Coufalová, L., & Mikula, Š. (2023). The grass is not greener on the other side: the role of attention in voting behaviour. Public Choice, 194(1), 205-223.

Coufalová, L., Mikula, Š., & Ševčík, M. (2023). Homophily in voting behaviour: Evidence from preferential voting. Kyklos, 76(2), 281-300.

Cox, G.W., Fiva, J.H., Smith, D.M., & Sørensen, R.J. (2021). Moral hazard in electoral teams: List rank and campaign effort. Journal of Public Economics, 200.

Crutzen, B. S., and N. Sahuguet. (2023). Comparative Politics with Intraparty Candidate Selection. European Journal of Political Economy 79, 102445.

Dal Bó, E., and F. Finan. (2018). Progress and Perspectives in the Study of Political Selection. Annual Review of Economics 10, 541-75.

Dal Bó, E., F. Finan, O. Folke, T. Persson, and J. Rickne. (2017). Who Becomes a Politician? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 132(4): 1877-1914.

Däubler, T., L. Christensen, and L. Linek. (2018). Parliamentary Activity, Re-Selection and the Personal Vote. Evidence from Flexible-List Systems. Parliamentary Affairs 71(4): 930-49.

Däubler, T. (2022). The Personalization of Electoral Rules: How Shifting Influence From Selectors to Voters Affects Party Unity. Political Research Quarterly 75(1): 160-174.

Däubler, T., Chiru, M., & Hermansen, S.S. (2022). Introducing COMEPELDA: Comprehensive European Parliament electoral data covering rules, parties and candidates. European Union Politics, 23(2), 351-371.

Dvořák, P. (2023). The Impact of Closed and Flexible Candidate Lists on the Representation of the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic. Politics in Central Europe 19(2): 183-216.

Eggers, A.C., & Lauderdale, B.E. (2016). Simulating Counterfactual Representation. Political Analysis, 24(2), 281-290.

Fazekas, Z., & Hansen, M.E. (2022). Incentives for non-participation: absence in the United Kingdom House of Commons, 1997–2015. Public Choice, 191(1-2), 51-73.

Fearon, J.D. (1999). Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. In A. Przeworski, S.C. Stokes, and B. Manin (Eds.), Democracy, accountability, and representation. 55-97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Frank, M., & Stadelmann, D. (2021). Political competition and legislative shirking in roll-call votes: Evidence from Germany for 1953–2017. Public Choice, 189(3), 555-575.

Gagliarducci, S., Nannicini, T., & Naticchioni, P. (2011). Electoral rules and politicians' behaviour: a micro test. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(3), 144-74.

Galasso, V., & Nannicini, T. (2011). Competing on good politicians. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 79-99.

Galasso, V., and T. Nannicini. (2015). So Closed: Political Selection in Proportional Systems. European Journal of Political Economy 40, 260-73.

Galasso, V., & Nannicini, T. (2017). Political selection under alternative electoral rules. Public Choice, 171(3), 257-281.

Gavoille, N., & Verschelde, M. (2017). Electoral competition and political selection: An analysis of the activity of French deputies, 1958–2012. European Economic Review, 92, 180-195.

Gendźwiłł, A., & Marcinkiewicz, K. (2019). Interventionism of voters: district size, level of government, and the use of preference votes. Acta Politica, 54(1), 1-21.

Hangartner, D., N. A. Ruiz, and J. Tukiainen. (2019). Open or Closed? How List Type Affects Electoral Performance, Candidate Selection, and Campaign Effort. VATT Institute for Economic Research Working Papers, No 120. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3418767

Hardin, J. W., and J. M. Hilbe. (2014). Estimation and Testing of Binomial and Beta-Binomial Regression Models with and without Zero Inflation. The Stata Journal 14(2): 292-303.

Hájek, L. (2019). Effects of age and tenure on MPs’ legislative behaviour in the Czech Republic. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 25(4), 553-575.

Hix, S. (2002). Parliamentary behaviour with two principals: preferences, parties, and voting in the European Parliament. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 688-698.

Hloušek, V., Kopeček, L., & Vodová, P. (2020). The rise of entrepreneurial parties in European politics. Cham: Palgrave.

Jurajda, Š., & Münich, D. (2015). Candidate ballot information and election outcomes: the Czech case. Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(5), 448-469.

Katz, R.S. (1986). Intraparty preference voting. In B. Grofman, and A. Lijphart (Eds.), Electoral laws and their political consequences. 85-103. New York: Agathon.

Koß, M. (2018). Parliaments in time: The evolution of legislative democracy in Western Europe, 1866-2015. Oxford University Press.

Latner, M., & McGann, A. (2005). Geographical representation under proportional representation: The cases of Israel and the Netherlands. Electoral studies, 24(4), 709-734.

Louwerse, Tom, & van Vonno, Cynthia, 2022. Moving up or down: parliamentary activity and candidate selection. The Journal of Legislative Studies 28, 216–242.

Marcinkiewicz, K., & Stegmaier, M. (2015). Ballot Position Effects Under Compulsory and Optional Preferential-List PR Electoral Systems. Political Behaviour, 37(2), 465-486.

Mechtel, M. (2014). It's the Occupation, Stupid! Explaining Candidates' Success in Low-Information Elections. European Journal of Political Economy 33, 53-70.

Outlý, J., & Prouza, J. (2009). Navrhování a výběr kandidátů: politické strany v ČR a ve střední Evropě. Olomouc: Periplum.

Papagni, E., Baraldi, A.L., & Alfano, M.R. (2023). Ballot structure and political selection. Evidence from changes in electoral rules. Journal of Comparative Economics, 51(1), 324-347.

Pemstein, D., Meserve, S.A., & Bernhard, W.T. (2015). Brussels Bound: Policy Experience and Candidate Selection in European Elections. Comparative Political Studies, 48(11), 1421-1453.

Rahat, G., & Hazan, R.Y. (2001). Candidate selection methods: an analytical framework. Party Politics, 7(3), 297-322.

Ramstetter, L., & Habersack, F. (2020). Do women make a difference? Analysing environmental attitudes and actions of Members of the European Parliament. Environmental Politics, 29(6), 1063-1084.

Renwick, A., & Pilet, J.-B. (2016). Faces on the ballot. The personalization of electoral systems in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schobess, R. (2022). Behind the Scenes: What Is Parliamentary Performance and How Can We Measure It? Parliamentary Affairs 75(4): 767-90.

Serra, G. (2011). Why primaries? The party’s tradeoff between policy and valence. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 23(1), 21-51.

Shugart, M.S., Valdini, M.E., & Suominen, K. (2005). Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 437-449.

Sieberer, U., & Ohmura, T. (2021). Mandate type, electoral safety, and defections from the party line: The conditional mandate divide in the German Bundestag, 1949–2013. Party Politics, 27(4), 704-715.

Smrek, M. (2023). Mavericks or Loyalists? Popular Ballot Jumpers and Party Discipline in the Flexible-List PR Context. Political Research Quarterly, 76(1), 323-326.

Söderlund, P., von Schoultz, Å., & Papageorgiou, A. (2021). Coping with complexity: Ballot position effects in the Finnish open-list proportional representation system. Electoral Studies, 71.

Stegmaier, M., Tosun, J., & Vlachová, K. (2014). Women’s parliamentary representation in the Czech Republic: Does preference voting matter? East European Politics & Societies, 28(1), 187-204.

Svitáková, K., & Šoltés, M. (2023). Ranking of candidates on slates: Evidence from 20,000 electoral slates. Party Politics, published online.

Syllová, Jindřiška et al. 2021. Jednací řád Poslanecké sněmovny: Komentář. [Rules of procedure of the Chamber of Deputies. Commentary] Praha: Wolters Kluwer.

Van Erkel, P.F.A. (2019). Sharing is caring: the role of voter-candidate similarities in intra-party electoral competition. European Political Science Review, 11(1), 75-89.

Verge, T., & Wiesehomeier, N. (2019). Parties, Candidates, and Gendered Political Recruitment in Closed-List Proportional Representation Systems: The Case of Spain. Political Research Quarterly, 72(4), 805-820.

Wauters, B., Thijssen, P., & Van Erkel, P. (2020). Preference Voting in the Low Countries. Politics of the Low Countries 2(1), 77-106.