Impact of the Informal Economy on the Efficiency and Productivity of Pakistan’s Agricultural Sector

Shakeel, Jovera and Attique, Iman and Nadir, Munazza (2024): Impact of the Informal Economy on the Efficiency and Productivity of Pakistan’s Agricultural Sector.

Abstract

According to the Ministry of Finance, more than 40 percent of Pakistan’s GDP is attributed to the informal sector. Nearly 75 percent of Pakistan’s working-age population is employed in the informal sector, according to the Labour Force Survey (2020-2021). The widespread persistence of the informal sector has several manifestations in the country’s agricultural economy. This study analyses the impact of the informal economy on agricultural productivity in Pakistan by applying Stochastic Frontier and Principal Component Analysis models using the Pakistan Standards of Living Measurement (PSLM) farm-level data collected in 2014, 2016, and 2019. It is the first regionally and nationally representative study of the informal economy’s impact on agricultural indicators using the country’s largest dataset. These findings show, as prior literature has suggested, that farms utilizing formal economic relations, including better working employment contracts, more access to proper credit resources, and better irrigation systems, produce higher yields than farms that operate within informal structures. In addition, crop diversification and resource allocation were found to be significant in raising the efficiency of agriculture. But there is also a geographical dimension to productivity - some of the agro-climatic regions are lagging consistently implying a case for focused attention.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Agricultural Productivity, Farm Efficiency, Cropping Patterns, Agro-climatic Zones, Crop Diversification, Informal Economy, Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Resource Allocation
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q10 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment

References

Agyekum, K., Atakora, A., Kwasi Darfor, & Singh, S. (2015). Agricultural credit rationing by banks in Ghana: A case of smallholder farmers in the Upper West Region of Ghana. Agricultural Finance Review, 75(2), 174–191.

Benjamin, N., Mbaye, A. A., & Diop, S. (2014). The informal sector in Francophone Africa: Firm size, productivity, and institutions (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6888). Washington, DC: World Bank.

Iqbal, N., & Munir, S. (2018). An estimation of technical efficiency of strawberry production in District Charsadda, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Journal of Agricultural Research, 56(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10. Accessed August 26, 2024.

International Labour Organization. (2023, August 1). How decent work can transform cotton production. ILO News. https://www.ilo.org/resource/news/how-decent-work-can-transform-cotton-production

International Labour Organization. (n.d.). Informal economy in Pakistan. ILO Asia-Pacific. https://www.ilo.org/regions-and-countries/asia-and-pacific-deprecated/areas-work/informal-economy-pakistan#:~:text=The%20 Accessed August 26, 2024.

Kasnakoğlu, H., & Yurdakul, M. (2016). The effect of the informal economy on income inequality: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting, 3(2), 135–146.

Simmons, T. J. (1999, February 2). An analysis of the technical efficiency of cotton farmers in the Punjab Province in Pakistan. 1999 Conference (43rd), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand. Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare99/123815.html