Forest and Ecology Grants: Way Ahead for the 16th Finance Commission

Bhatkhande, Aniket and Pethe, Abhay (2024): Forest and Ecology Grants: Way Ahead for the 16th Finance Commission.

Abstract

Climate change is dominating risk analysis across governments and businesses and biodiversity conservation is critical mitigation against it. India through the Forest and Ecology grant has the world’s largest Ecological Fiscal Transfer. As the 16th Finance Commission deliberates it can consider the availability of newer datasets as well as past performance of the grant. We appeal to integration of three principles: Fairness and Equity, Ring-Fencing and Additionality, and Incentivizing Performance. We argue for a more inclusive definition of forest and ecology to include diverse ecosystems like grasslands and deserts. Secondly, we present evidence that communities around ecosystem bear the cost of regulation and thus argue for a separate grant-in-aid for communities around the ecosystems extending the opportunity cost principle to the third tier of governments. Lastly for incentivizing performance we recommend a grant-in-aid for the forest departments of the states who are responsible for maintenance and preservation of these ecosystems.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Ecological Economics, Environmental Fiscal Federalism, Ecological Fiscal Transfer, Indian Finance Commissions, Third-tier Governments
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q23 - Forestry; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology

References

Asher, S., & Novosad, P. (2020). Rural roads and local economic development. American economic review, 110(3), 797-823.

Asher, S., Tobias L., Ryu M., & Paul N. (2021) Development research at high geographic resolution: an analysis of night-lights, firms, and poverty in India using the shrug open data platform. The World Bank Economic Review 35, no. 4: 845-871.

Bhuvan | Thematic Data dissemination | Free GIS Data | OGC Services | Clip and Ship. (n.d.). https://bhuvan-app1.nrsc.gov.in/thematic/thematic/index.php

Busch, J., Kapur, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2020). Did India’s ecological fiscal transfers incentivize state governments to increase their forestry budgets?. Environmental Research Communications, 2(3), 031006.

Busch, J., Ring, I., Akullo, M., Amarjargal, O., Borie, M., Cassola, R. S., ... & Zhou, K. (2021). A global review of ecological fiscal transfers. Nature Sustainability, 4(9), 756-765.

Chave, J., & Levin, S. (2004). Scale and scaling in ecological and economic systems (pp. 29- 59). Springer Netherlands.

Dasgupta, P. (2021), The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review. (London: HM Treasury) ELEVENTH FINANCE COMMISSION. (2000). REPORT OF THE ELEVENTH FINANCE COMMISSION (FOR 2000-2005).

https://fincomindia.nic.in/asset/doc/commission-reports/11th-FC/11threport.pdf

Fifteenth Finance Commission. (2021). In Fifteenth Finance Commission: Vol. I. https://fincomindia.nic.in/asset/doc/commission-reports/XVFC-Complete-Report-1.pdf

Fourteenth Finance Commission. (2015). In Fourteenth Finance Commission: Vol. I. https://fincomindia.nic.in/asset/pdf/commission-reports/14thFCReport.pdf

Global Risks Report 2024 | World Economic Forum. (n.d.). World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2024/digest/

India State of Forest Report (2021) Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India. ISBN 978-81-950073-1-8

Forest Survey of India, 2015. State of Forest Report, 2015. Available at: https://www.fsi.nic.in/forest-report-2015 (Accessed: 28 September, 2020).

Ministry of Rural development, Government of India. “Socio Economic and Caste Census.” (2011).

Pethe, A., Karnik, A., Lalvani, M., & Kelkar, H. (2024). Instilling cooperation in turbulent times: some issues before the 16th Finance Commission. Source: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/122387/

Pethe A, B. M. Misra and Rakhe P B (2009), Strengthening Decentralization: Augmenting the Consolidated fund of the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission-A Normative Approach, Development Research Group (DRG), Study No-29, Reserve Bank of India.

Pethe, A. and M. Lalvani (2008), Finances of Panchayati Raj Institutions: A Simple Story but a Messy Plot, Working Paper 28, Vibhooti Shukla Unit in Urban Economics, Department of Economics, University of Mumbai; Reprinted as a Chapter in ‘Independent Evaluation of Panchayati Raj in India’ IRMA, Anand. Commissioned by MoPR, GoI.

Rangarajan, C., Prasad, T. R., Srivastava, D. K., National Institute of Public Finance & Policy (NIPFP), Planning Commission, Srivastava, G. C., & Acharya, S. N. (2004). Report of the TWELFTH FINANCE COMMISSION (2005-10). https://fincomindia.nic.in/asset/doc/commission-reports/12th-FC/reports/eng/12fcreng.pdf

Thirteenth Finance Commission. (2010). Thirteenth Finance Commission: Vol. Volume I: Report (p. 1). https://fincomindia.nic.in/asset/doc/commission-reports/13th-FC/english/13fcrengVol1.pdf