Strategic stockpiling reduces the geopolitical risk to the supply chain of copper and lithium

Vespignani, joaquin vespignani and Smyth, Russell and Saadaoui, Jamel (2025): Strategic stockpiling reduces the geopolitical risk to the supply chain of copper and lithium.

Abstract

Copper and lithium are essential to the global energy transition, each playing distinct roles in enabling low-carbon technologies. However, their supply chains are highly vulnerable to geopolitical risks, posing a threat to the stability and resilience of future clean energy systems.This study proposes strategic stockpiling as a cost-effective instrument to mitigate supply disruptions due to geopolitical risks in copper and lithium supply chains. First, we develop and apply novel, stage-specific, measures of geopolitical risk for copper and lithium for each of the four key phases of their supply chain: proven reserves, extraction, refining and end-use consumption. Second, we construct forward-looking stockpiling scenarios for both minerals, grounded in projected demand under the International Energy Agency’s Announced Pledges (APS) and Net Zero Scenario (NZS) pathways. Our estimates indicate substantial supply shortfalls by 2040 when strategic stockpiling is incorporated. Specifically, we project the shortfall in lithium supply to increase by a factor of 7.8 under APS and 9.8 under NZS, while copper shortages are projected to grow by 4.6 and 6.1 times, respectively. We consider Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven productivity gains and recycling as alternative ways to alleviate shortages in both copper and lithium markets. We show that while enhanced recycling can significantly contribute to closing the supply gap for copper, its impact remains limited in the case of lithium due to technological, geological, and geographical constraints. We conclude that AI-driven productivity gains are essential to close the supply gap for both critical minerals.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Critical Minerals; Copper; Lithium; Geopolitical Risk; Stockpiling
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E00 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles

References

1. IEA. Securing Clean Energy Transitions through Critical Mineral Stockpiles. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical�mineral-stockpiles (2023).

2. Kang, W., Smyth, R., Vespignani, J. The Macroeconomic Fragility of Critical Mineral Markets. CAMA Working Paper 21/2025 (2025).

3. Trading Economics. Lithium, Copper Historical Prices. https://tradingeconomics.com (2024).

4. Saadaoui, J., Smyth, R., Vespignani, J. Ensuring the security of the clean energy transition: Examining the impact of geopolitical risk on the price of critical minerals. Energy Econ. 142, 108195 (2025).

5. Energy Voice. IEA says governments should consider stockpiling battery metals. https://www.energyvoice.com/renewables-energy-transition/320536/iea-says�governments-should-consider-stockpiling-battery-metals/ (2021).

6. IEA. International Resource Strategy: National Stockpiling System. https://www.iea.org/policies/16639-international-resource-strategy-national�stockpiling-system (2023a).24

7. GAO. National Defense Stockpile Management. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao�24-106959.pdf (2024).

8. European Commission. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament, of the Council establishing a framework for ensuring a secure, sustainable supply of critical raw materials, amending certain Regulations. Brussels: European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal�content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52023PC0160 (2023).

9. News.com.au. Albanese’s $1.2bn Critical Minerals Pledge. https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/anthony-albaneses-12bn-pledge-amid�donald-trumps-tariff-threat/news-story/e24eca60e26b8517c3a4d2aacf7abbae (2024).

10. Economic Times. India speeds up MMDR amendments for critical minerals. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/indl-goods/svs/metals�mining/centre-plans-speeding-up-mmdr-amendments-to-boost-critical-mineral�availability/articleshow/121677043.cms (2024).

11. Financial Times. China’s rare earth export controls raise global alarm. https://www.ft.com/content/96663612-a1dd-41a8-829b-f2c0a562b9ab (2024).

12. Acemoglu, D., Tahbaz-Salehi, A. The macroeconomics of supply chain disruptions. Rev. Econ. Stud. 92, 656–695 (2025).

13. USGS. Mineral commodity summaries 2024. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2024/mcs2024.pdf (2024).

14. Vespignani, J., Smyth, R. Artificial intelligence investments reduce risks to critical mineral supply. Nat. Commun. 15, 7304 (2024).

15. OECD. Critical minerals for the energy transition: Investment, trade, and geopolitical risks. Paris: OECD (2023).

16. Saadaoui, J., Smyth, R., Vespignani, J. Ensuring the security of the clean energy transition: Examining the impact of geopolitical risk on the price of critical minerals. Energy Econ. 142, 108195 (2025).

17. Caldara, D., Iacoviello, M. Measuring geopolitical risk. Am. Econ. Rev. 112, 1194–1225 (2022).

18. ABC News. Sydney bishop among those stabbed in Wakeley church attack. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-15/wakeley-church-stabbing-terrorism�attack/102561234 (2024).

19. The Guardian. Donald Trump wins US presidential election. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/06/donald-trump-wins-us�presidential-election (2024).

20. Wright, B.D., Williams, J.C. The economic role of commodity storage. Econ. J. 92, 596–614 (1982).

21. Newbery, D.M., Stiglitz, J.E. The theory of commodity price stabilization. A study in the economics of risk. (1981).

22. S&P Global Market Intelligence https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en (2024),25

23. Pedersen, A., Jaswal, M. A tale of a looming surplus in the lithium industry: sticky supply to stay? https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/a-tale-of-a-looming�surplus-in-the-lithium-industry-sticky-supply-to-stay/ (2024)