Bacha, Obiyathulla I. (1997): Adapting Mudarabah Financing to Contemporary Realities: A Proposed Financing Structure. Published in: The Journal of Accounting, Commerce & Finance; Islamic Perspective , Vol. 1, No. 1 (June 1997): pp. 26-54.
Download (184kB) | Preview
Islamic banking in Malaysia, despite its recent start, has seen very rapid growth. This growth however has been uneven. While short-term trade financing has always been dominant and grown rapidly, Mudarabah financing by Islamic banks in Malaysia has reduced to insignificantly amounts. Yet, Mudarabah which is based on profit and loss sharing has always been considered to be at the core of Islamic financing and in tune with the shariah’s injunctions against interest based financing.
The paper addresses why this has been the case. Using conventional finance theories it is shown that Mudarabah financing has serious agency problems, lacks the bonding effect of debt financing and can induce perverse incentives. Following an analysis of these problems in Part I. Part II compare: Mudarabah with conventional debt and equity financing within a risk-return framework. Using scenario analysis, it is shown that for a ‘borrower’ faced with the alternative of using Mudarabah, debt or equity financing, Mudarabah would be best in a risk-return framework. For a financier faced with the same three alternatives however, Mudarabah financing would be the worst. Expected returns would be the lowest while risk highest among the three alternatives. This has to do with the structure of Mudarabah financing where strict interpretation of the Shariah requires the financier to absorb all losses, but profits to be shared. It is argued that this inequality in the distribution of risk and returns has caused Islamic banks to reduce Mudarabah financing.
Part III proposes an alternative financial arrangement under Mudarabah. Using the principles of mezzanine and vertical-strip financing, currently in use in venture-capital and other high risk financing like Leveraged Buyouts (LBOs), it is shown that a more equitable distribution of risk and returns can be achieved. The proposal requires the mudarib (borrower) to ‘reimburse' the financier in the event of certain outcomes. This reimbursement will be in form of the Mudarib giving up part of his equity to the financier. While this reduces the agency problems and the downside risk faced by the financier it does not eliminate all such risk. Thus, both parties will be required to be responsible and cautious in undertaking new projects.
Part IV concludes with an evaluation of the proposed arrangement in the context of the Shariah
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Adapting Mudarabah Financing to Contemporary Realities: A Proposed Financing Structure|
|Keywords:||An adapted model for Mudarabah; Islamic profit-loss sharing financing|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design
G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill
|Depositing User:||Obiyathulla/ I Bacha|
|Date Deposited:||14. Jan 2009 10:30|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 01:50|
(1) BIMB Seminar On Islamic Banking. An Overview Series 1994. Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad.
(2) Geske, R. (1977), The Valuation of Corporate Liabilities as Compound Options", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 12, 541 552.
(3) Hashem Sabbagh (1986), The Mechanics and Operations of an Islamic Financial Market". IDB IRTI, ~Seminar On Developing A System Of Islamic Financial Instruments.
(4) Hussein Hamed Hassan (1986), "Financial Intermediation in the Framework of Shariah". IDB IRTI, Seminar On Developing A System of Islamic Financial Instruments.
(5) Jensen M.C. ~ Meckling W.H. (1976), "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure" Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1976) 305 360.
(6) Jensen M.C. (1986 a), Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers" The Modern Theory of Corporate Finance, McGraw Hill 1990.
(7) Muhammadmmad Nejatullah Siddiqui (1985), ~Partnership and Profit Sharing in Islamic Law" The Islamic Foundation, Islamic Economic Series 9.
(8) Obiyathulla B Bacha (1995), Conventional Versus Mudarabah Financing; An Agency Cost Perspective''. Journal of Islamic Economics, Vol. 4, No. 1 & 2, 1995.
(9) Radiah Kadir (1994), 'Perbankan Tanpa Faedah: Alternatif atau Pelengkapan kepada Sistem Perbankan di Malaysia'. Working Paper, Islamic Economics Seminar Series, Januari 1994.
(10) Rodney Wilson (1994), Development of Financial Instruments in an Islamic Framework". IDB IRTI, Islamic Economic Studies; Vol. 2, No. 1, Dec. 1994.
(11) Ziauddin Ahmad (1994), Islamic Banking: State of the Art". IDB IRTI, Islamic Economic Studies; Vol. 2, No. 1, Dec. 1994.
(12) Zubair Hassan (1985), ' Determination of Profit and Loss Sharing Ratios in Interest¬free Business Finance". Journal of Research in Islamic Economics; Vol. 3, No. 1, 1985, pp. 13 29.