Van Beers, Cees and Dekker, Ronald (2009): Acquisitions, Divestitures and Innovation Performance in the Netherlands.
Download (278kB) | Preview
This aim of this paper is twofold. First it examines the determinants of acquisitions and divestitures of Dutch firms in the period 1996-2004. Second, it investigates the impact of acquisitions and divestitures on the firm’s innovative output performance. An econometric model is specified and estimated with Community Innovation Survey data for the Netherlands in the period 1996-2004. The main findings of this study are as follows. First, innovating firms are significantly more involved in acquisition activities than non-innovating firms, which suggests that acquisitions are a strategy to gain access to new technologies or knowledge. Second, lack of knowledge as a barrier to innovate increases the chance of acquiring assets of other firms although not significantly. Lack of finance as a barrier to innovate increases significantly the chance of divesting assets. Third, acquisitions motivated by knowledge barriers in the innovation process affect the probability of positive innovative sales positively while acquisitions motivated by other reasons than innovation barriers affect this probability negatively. No effect of knowledge barriers induced acquisitions on the level of the innovative sales could be found.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Acquisitions, Divestitures and Innovation Performance in the Netherlands|
|Keywords:||Innovation; performance; mergers; acquisitions; divestitures; strategy|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L10 - General
D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D40 - General
|Depositing User:||El Arkesteijn|
|Date Deposited:||23. Feb 2009 14:15|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 07:33|
Ahuja, G. And R. Katila, 2001, Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study, Strategic Management Journal 22, 197-220.
Andrade, G., M. Mitchell and E. Stafford, New Evidence on Mergers, 2001, Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (2), 103-120.
Blonigen, B.A. and C.T. Taylor, 2000, R&D intensity and acquisitions in high-technology industries: evidence from the US electronic and electrical equipment industries, The Journal of Industrial Economics XLVIII, 47-70.
Brauer, M., 2006, What Have We Acquired and What Should We Acquire in Divestiture Research? A Review and Research Agenda, Journal of Management, 32 (6) 751-785.
Capron, L., 1999, The long-term performance of horizontal acquisitions, Strategic Management Journal 20, 987-1018.
Cassiman, B., M.G. Colombo, P. Garrone and R. Veugelers, 2005, The Impact of M&A on the R&D process. An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Technological and Market Relatedness, Research Policy 34, 195-220.
Chakrabarti, A., J. Hauschildt and C. Suverkup, 1994, Does it pay to acquire technological firms, R&D Management 24 (1), 47-56.
Cloodt, M., J. Hagedoorn and H. Van Kranenburg, 2006, Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries, Research Policy 35 (5), 642 - 654.
Ernst, H. And Jan Vitt, 2000, The Influence of Corporate Acquisitions on the Behavior of Key Inventors, R&D Management 30 (2), 105-119.
Geroski, P., S. Machin and J. Van Reenen, 1993, The profitability of innovating firms, RAND Journal of Economics 24, 198-211.
Gugler, K., D.C. Mueller, B. Yurtoglu and C. Zulehner, 2003, The Effects of Mergers: An International Comparison, International Journal of Industrial Organisation 21 (5), 625-653.
Hagedoorn, J. And G. Duysters, 2002, The Effect of Mergers and Acquisitions on the Technological Performance of Companies in a High-Tech Environment, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 14 (1) 67-85.
Hitt, M.A., R.E. Hoskisson, R.D. Ireland and J.S. Harrison, 1991, Effects of acquisition on R&D inputs and outputs, Academy of Management Journal 34 (3), 693-706.
Hitt, M.A., R. Hoskisson, R. Johnson and D. Moesel, 1996, The Market for Corporate Control and Firm Innovation, Academy of Management Journal 39 (8), 1084-1119.
Jensen, M., 1988, Takeovers: their causes and consequences, Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, 21-48.
Jensen, M., 1993, The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and Control Systems, Journal of Finance 48, 831-880.
Katz, M.L. and H.A. Shelanski, 2004, Merger policy and innovation: must enforcement change to account for technological change, NBER Working Paper 10710, Cambridge, USA.
Maksimovic, V., G. Phillips and N.R. Prabhala, 2008, Post-Merger Restructuring and the Boundaries of the Firm, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 14291.
Mitchell, M. L. and J. H. Mulherin, 1996, The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity, Journal of Financial Economics 41, 193-229.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny, 1988, Characteristics of Hostile and Friendly Takeovers, in: Alan J. Auerbach, ed., Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences (University of Chicago Press / NBER, Chicago, IL).
Prabhu, J.C., R.K. Chandy and M.E. Ellis, 2005, The Impact of Acquisitions on Innovations: Poison Pill, Placebo or Tonic?, Journal of Marketing 69, 114-130.
Röller, L.-H. (2005). Economic Analysis and Competition Policy Enforcement in Europe. Modelling European Mergers: Theory, Competition and Case Studies. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Sorensen, D., 2000, Characteristics of merging firms, Journal of Economics and Business 52, 423-433.
Van Beers, C. And B.M. Sadowski, 2003, On the Relationship Between Acquistions, Divestitutres and Innovations: An Explorative Study, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 3 (1/2) 131-143.
Veugelers, R. And B. Cassiman, 1999, Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms, Research Policy 28, 63-80.
Wevers, R., C. van Beers and F. Zand, 2008, R&D cooperation diversity and innovation, paper presented at DRUID Conference 2008, June 17-20, Copenhagen, 2008.