Stephan, Levy (2004): Best-price Guarantees as a Quality Signal.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_13466.pdf Download (358kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper shows that best-price guarantees can enhance welfare, in contrast to findings in recent literature. While a high-quality monopolist can signal its quality strictly through high prices, using both price and a best-price guarantee may allow the firm to signal its quality with a smaller price distortion. A low-quality monopolist will not mimic its high-quality counterpart by offering a best-price guarantee, because the accompanying restrictions are too costly. Best-price guarantees are similar to money-back guarantees and other more general contracts in their ability to allow less costly signaling. The welfare enhancing capabilities of these contracts imply that the antitrust authorities should regard them more favorably.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Best-price Guarantees as a Quality Signal |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Most favored customer; MFCC; best-price guarantees; signaling; game theory; industrial organization |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L15 - Information and Product Quality ; Standardization and Compatibility L - Industrial Organization > L0 - General > L00 - General |
Item ID: | 13466 |
Depositing User: | Stephan Levy |
Date Deposited: | 18 Feb 2009 09:38 |
Last Modified: | 04 Oct 2019 17:48 |
References: | Bagwell, K. and Riordan, M. "High and Declining Prices Signal Product Quality." American Economic Review, Vol. 81 (1991), pp. 224-239. Bagwell, K. "Optimal Export Policy for a New-Product Monopoly." American Economic Review, Vol. 81 (1991), pp. 1156-1169. Besanko, D. and Lyon, T.P. "Equilibrium Incentives for Most-Favored Customer Clauses in an Oligopolistic Industry." International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 11 (1993), pp. 347-367. Butz, D.A. "Durable-Good Monopoly and Best-Price Provisions." American Economic Review, Vol. 80 (1990), pp. 1062-1076. Cho, I. and Kreps, D.M. "Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria." Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 102 (1987), pp. 179-221. Cooper, T.E. "Most-favored-customer Pricing and Tacit Collusion." Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 17 (1986), pp. 377-388. Coase, R. “Durability and Monopoly.” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 15 (1972), pp. 143-149. Crocker, K.J. and Lyon, T.P. "What do 'Facilitating Practices' Facilitate? An Empirical Investigation of Most-Favored-Nation Clauses in Natural Gas Contracts." Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 37 (1994), pp. 297-322. Klein, B. and Leffler, K.B. "The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance." Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89 (1981), pp. 615-641. Kreps, D.M. and Wilson, R. "Sequential Equilibria." Econometrica, Vol. 50 (1982), pp. 863-894. Neilson, W.S. and Winter, H. "Bilateral Most-Favored-Customer Pricing and Collusion." Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 24 (1993), pp. 147-155. Riordan, M.H. "Monopolistic Competition with Experience Goods." Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 101 (1986), pp. 265-279. Shapiro, C. "Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations." Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 98 (1983), pp. 659-680. Shieh, S. "Price and Money-Back Guarantees as Signals of Product Quality." Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 5 (1996), pp. 361-378. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/13466 |