Galimberti, Jaqueson Kingeski and Cupertino, César Medeiros (2009): Explaining earnings persistence: a threshold autoregressive panel unit root approach.
Download (411kB) | Preview
This paper proposes a reassessment to the hypothesis that the persistence of current earnings performance is decreasing in the magnitude of the accrual component of earnings and increasing in the magnitude of the cash flow component of earnings. For this purpose, a threshold autoregressive panel unit root approach is proposed using a Fisher-type. This approach allowed us to distinguish between unconditioned and conditioned measures of persistence, making it possible to infer whether the earnings components condition its persistence. The approach was applied to a sample of 126 Brazilian firms in the period from 1995 to 2007. Our main results are the finding of relevant earnings persistence heterogeneity between the firms in the sample, a relatively lower unconditioned measure of earnings persistence, and a partial rejection of the hypothesis afore mentioned, specifically about the effects of the accruals components over the earnings persistence.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Explaining earnings persistence: a threshold autoregressive panel unit root approach|
|Keywords:||earnings persistence; accruals; threshold autoregressions; panel unit root tests|
|Subjects:||M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M41 - Accounting
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models
G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G10 - General
|Depositing User:||Jaqueson Kingeski Galimberti|
|Date Deposited:||24. Mar 2009 12:58|
|Last Modified:||24. Apr 2015 04:53|
BALL, R.; BROWN, P. Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, v.6, n.2, p.159-178, 1968.
BREITUNG, J.; PESARAN, M. H.. Unit Roots and Cointegration in Panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, n.0535, 2005.
CANER, Mehmet; HANSEN, Bruce E. Threshold Autoregression with a Unit Root. Econometrica, v. 69, n. 6, p.1555-1596, Nov. 2001.
CHAN, K. S. Consistency and Limiting Distribution of the Least Squares Estimator of a Threshold Autoregressive Model. The Annals of Statistics, v. 21, p.520-533, 1993.
CORE, J. E.; GUAY, W. R.; LARCKER, D. F. Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: a Survey. Economic Policy Review, April, 2003.
DAMODARAN, A. Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of any Asset. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
DECHOW, P.; SLOAN, R.; SWEENEY, A. Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, v.70, p.3-42, 1995.
ENDERS, Walter. Applied Econometric Time Series. Second Edition, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
FAIRFIELD, P.M., WHISENANT, S.; YOHN, T.L. The Differential Persistence of Accruals and Cash Flows for Future Operating Income Versus Future Profitability. Review of Accounting Studies, v.8, n.2-3, p.221-243, 2003.
FASB, Financial Accounting Standards Board. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 1 (SFAC nº 1): Objectives of Financial Reporting by Business Enterprises, 1978.
FRANKEL, R.; LITOV, L. Earnings Persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v.47, n.1-2, p.182- 190, 2009.
HENDRIKSEN, E. S.; VAN BREDA, M. F. Accounting Theory, 5 ed., Irwin Professional Publishing, 1991.
HURLIN, Christophe; MIGNON, Valérie. Second Generation Panel Unit Root Tests. HAL Working Papers, halshs-00159842_v1, Jul. 2007.
IM, K. S.; PESARAN, M. H.; SHIN, Y. Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels, Journal of Econometrics, v. 115, p. 53-74, 2003.
KASERER, C., KLINGLER, C. The Accrual Anomaly Under Different Accounting Standards - Lessons Learned From the German Experiment. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, v.35, n.7-8, p.837-859, 2008.
LEHMAN, B. Earnings, dividend policy, and present value relations: building blocks of dividend policy invariant cash flows. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, v. 3, p.263-82, 1993.
LEVIN, A.; LIN, C. F.; CHU, C. Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, v. 108, p. 1-24, 2002.
LUNDHOLM, R. J. A Tutorial on the Ohlson and Feltham/Ohlson Models: Answers to some Frequently Asked Questions. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 11, p.749-761, 1995.
MADDALA, G. S.; WU, Shaowen. A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, University Of Oxford, v. 61, Special Issue , p.631-652, 1999.
PANKOFF, L.D.; VIRGIL, R.L. Some Preliminary Findings From A Laboratory Experiment on the Usefulness of Financial Accounting Information to Security Analysts. Journal of Accounting Research, 8 (Supplement): 1-48, 1970.
PEASNELL, K. V. Some Formal Connections between Economic Values and Yields and Accounting Numbers. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, v. 9, 361-381, 1982.
PINCUS, M., RAJGOPAL, S., VENKATACHALAM, M. The Accrual Anomaly: International Evidence. Accounting Review, v.82, n.1, p.169-203, 2007.
SLOAN, Richard G. Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows About Future Earnings? The Accounting Review, v. 71, n. 3, p.289-315, Jul. 1996.
XIE, H. The Mispricing of Abnormal Accruals. The Accounting Review. v. 76, n. 3, 2001.